Cleaning Validation Study of Amoxycillin Trihydrate

 

Narendra Chotai 1, Vishnu Patel1, Harsha Patel2, Uren Patel1, and Rajendra Kotadiya2,*

1Pharmaceutics Department, A. R. College and G.H. Patel Institute of Pharmacy Vallabh Vidyanagar – 388 121, Gujarat, India

2Pharmaceutics Department, Indukaka Ipcowala College of Pharmacy, New Vallabh Vidyanagar – 388 121, Gujarat, India

 *Corresponding Author E-mail:  rajlec_qa@yahoo.com

 

ABSTRACT

Cross contamination is a major problem in a multi product manufacturing facility. This problem can multiply into major problem in a bulk drug manufacturing facility as cross contamination in one batch may end up in several batches. Hence cleaning validation is of utmost importance in these facilities. The present study was under taken to assess the effectiveness of  cleaning procedure being used in one of the WHO approved Pharmaceutical plant in Gujarat having common facilities for manufacture of dosage forms of Beta Lactam group of antibiotics where there is a risk of potential hazards of cross contamination. Cleaning validation studies were carried according to the cleaning validation protocol. The study showed good swabs recovery (91.84 %). The actives residue values on different sampling point were found within acceptance limit of 10mcg/sqcm   recommended by USFDA guidelines and Lilly criteria. It may be concluded that the cleaning procedure being used in Beta Lactam manufacturing plant was found satisfactory.

 

KEY WORDS:    Cleaning validation, Swab method, Rinse water method, Recovery Studies and Acceptance criteria

 


INTRODUCTION:

Cleaning validation is a documented process that proves the effectiveness and consistency in cleaning of the pharmaceutical production equipment1. Validation detects and analyses optimization potential and supports implementation. Pharmaceutical manufacturer often make a large number of product types in one facility. Often there are several different strengths prepared of the same product. The cleaning problems include large number of processes and product types manufacture within one facility. The number of cleaning methods, assays and types of equipment to be tested are often staggering2.

 

The current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) regulations recognize that cleaning is a critical issue to ensure product quality. Virtually every aspect of manufacturing involves cleaning, from the initial stage of bulk production to the final dosage form. The code of federal regulation (CFR) states that equipment and utensils shall be cleaned, maintained and sanitized at appropriate intervals to prevent malfunctions or contamination that would alter safety, identify, strength, quality or purity of the drug product beyond the official or other established requirements 3.

 

FDA considered the potential of cross contamination to be significant and to pose a serious health risk to the public. FDA expects firms to have written procedure called Standard Operating Procedure (SOPs), detailing the cleaning processes used for various pieces of equipments4.

 

Multiple product facilities (also referred to as multi product or multi use facilities) clearly represent a more difficult challenge. Procedurally steps must be taken in multiple product facility to ensure that cross contamination potential are eliminated. Changeover of the product from one product to another must be carefully controlled5.

 

As per USFDA and MCA guidelines separate manufacturing facilities are required to be created for the production of Penicillin and Cephalosporin group of antibiotics. But WHO guidelines allow the production of said dosage forms in same premises. Especially when common facilities are used for the production or various pharmaceutical products including that of Penicillin group of antibiotics, steps must be taken to ensure that cross-contamination potential is eliminated.

 

Looking at the risk of potential hazards of cross-contamination  of Amoxycillin Trihydrate, the present study was undertaken with a view to assess the effectiveness of leaning procedure being followed for equipment used in manufacturing of selected dosage forms of Penicillin group of antibiotic in one of the modern pharmaceutical manufacturing plant, approved by WHO6.

TABLE I: PRODUCT DETAILS AMOXICILLIN TRIHYDRATE SYMOXYL CAPSULE

Brand Name

Symoxyl Capsule: 250 mg

Generic Name

Amoxycillin Trihydrate

Therapeutic Category

Antibacterial

Therapeutic Dose

250 mg

Largest Daily Dose

4.5 g

Solubility

-Slightly soluble in water, in ethanol

 (95%), and in methanol.

-Practically insoluble in ether and in

  fixed oils.

-Soluble in dilute solutions of acids

 and alkali hydroxides.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Instruments:

1. UV-visible-spectrophotometer (UV-1601 Shimadzu)

2. Sophisticated Analytical Balance (AEX 200 LB Shimadzu)

 

Materials:

Amoxycillin Trihydrate IP was obtained as gift sample from Elysium Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Vadodara. Isopropyl Alcohol LR (S.D. Fine Chem. Ltd. Boisar, Mumbai), Vivid solution LR (Vivid Enterprise Ltd., Mumbai), Detergent solution LR, Teepol LR, Phenyl solution LR, Water for injection,  Demineralized water and Raw water.

 

TABLE II: LIST OF MANUFACTURING EQUIPMENTS,

SAMPLING POINTS AND SURFACE AREA

Sr. no.

Equipment

/Area

Sampling points

Surface area

(sq cm)

1.

Octagonal Blender

O1: Blade

O2: Inside surface

O3: Outlet

O4: Outlet cover

5,76,244.63

2.

Rapid Mixture

Granulator (RMG)

R1: Chopper

R2: Blade

R3: Inside surface

1,76,320.81

3.

Cad mill

C1: Hopper

C2: Blade

56,348.44

4.

Drum Blender

D1: Lid  

D2: Inside surface

800400. 52

5.

Sifter

F1: Outlet

F2: Gasket

F3: Periphery

41589. 64

6.

SA9 Filling

machine

A1: Hopper

A2: Platform

80087. 11

7.

 

Polishing machine

P1:Polishing Brush

P2: Sorter Unit

96337 99

8.

Blister pack

 machine

T1: Hopper

T2: Channel

160626 .32

9.

Manufacturing Area

15,86,145.50

10.

Capsule filling and polishing room

1147435.50

11

Blister pack room

541512.00

12.

Total surface area (Equipments and Department)

2147989.08

 

Cleaning Procedure and Validation Studies:

A cleaning validation master plan was prepared; it consisted of all necessary documentation for performing cleaning validation studies which included selection of dosage forms, selection of sampling points which are critical to clean and likely to contaminate the product, cleaning method, development and validation of analytical method for active, sampling method and recovery studies. ICH guidelines were followed for the preparation of cleaning validation protocol, containing the details of manufacturing process, the cleaning methods used, and responsibility of each person involved were clearly described7.

 

TABLE III: LINEARITY DATA

Concentration mcg/mL

Absorbance ± S.D. (n=3)

1

0.0230 ± 0.0001

2

0.0466 ± 0.0003

4

0.0930 ± 0.0001

6

0.1393 ± 0.0005

8

0.1816 ± 0.0005

10

0.2310 ± 0.0003

 

For the purpose of cleaning validation, a solid dosage form, Symoxyl (Amoxycillin Trihydrate) Capsule was selected. The product detail has been highlighted in Table 1.

 

Sampling point determination:

In present study various sampling points critical to clean and, likely to cross contaminate the other products in manufacturing area namely Capsule department were selected. The list of manufacturing equipments and sampling points has been shown in Table 2.

 

Surface area determination:

The total surface area of production department including equipments involved in Capsule manufacturing was calculated. Table 2

 

Cleaning methods:

At the point of change over of the product, cleaning of areas and equipments was undertaken as per the guidelines given in Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for cleaning.

 

TABLE IV: REPEATABILITY DATA (10 mcg/mL)

No. of  determination

Absorbance

Mean ± S.D.

% RSD

1

0.2310

 

0.231 ±

0.0001

 

 

0.0821

2

0.2308

3

0.2313

4

0.2311

5

0.2308

6

0.2310

 

Assay method and its validation:

Fifty mg of Amoxycillin Trihydrate was dissolved in water for injection to produce 1000 mL. From this solution various dilutions were made to obtain solutions having concentrations 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 mcg per mL. Absorbance was measured at 229 nm of for these solutions against water for injection as blank. Linear relationship between concentration and absorbance was observed (R2=0.9997) which was in agreement with Beer’s Lambert law (Figure 1). The method was validating using parameters such as linearity, repeatability, precision, accuracy and limit of quantification and limit of detection as shown in Table 3-7.

 

 

TABLE V: PRECISION DATA

Concentration

(mcg/ml)

Absorbance Intra-day

(n=3)

% RSD

Absorbance Inter day

(n=3)

%

RSD

1

0.0234

0.114

0.0230

0.675

2

0.0467

0.812

0.0466

0.643

6

0.1395

0.337

0.1393

0.414

10

0.2313

0.263

0.2310

0.139

 

Recovery studies:

Swab Method:

Stainless steel plates were used in swab recovery test to simulate manufacturing equipments. One side of each plate was spiked with 1 mL solution of active having concentration 500 mcg/mL, 1000 mcg/mL, and 1500 mcg/mL, respectively. Simultaneously, blank was spiked on second set. The plates were allowed to dry completely for overnight at room temperature. A swab was moistened with water for injection and the spiked plate surface was swabbed both vertically and horizontally. The drug content from the swab was extracted and the final volume made to 100 mL with solvent. The absorbance was measured at 229 nm to estimate Amoxycillin Trihydrate. (Table 8)

 

Rinse Water Method:

In rinse method same procedure was followed up to drying step. It was rinsed with water for injection and transferred to 100 mL volumetric flask. Volume was made with water for injection. The absorbance was measured at 229 nm to estimate Amoxycillin Trihydrate. (Table 8)

 

TABLE VI: ACCURACY DATA

Amount

of drug

in sample

(mcg/mL)

Amount of

drug added

(mcg/mL)

Amount recovered (mcg/mL)

Percentage recovery

Mean

percentage    recovery

6

0

5.93

98.83 %

 

99.54 %

 

6

2

8.00

100.0 %

6

4

9.91

99.1 %

6

6

12.03

100.25 %

 

Sampling Method:

Swab was prepared by tying 400 mg of absorbent cotton with thread on the wooden stick. The care was taken to avoid contamination during and after its preparation. Water for injection was used as recovery solvent for Amoxycillin Trihydrate. The tip of swab was thoroughly wetted with recovery solvent and the excess liquid was allowed to drain back into the container. This was achieved by quickly and lightly touching the tip of swab to the inside of container. The tip of swab was pressed firmly and evenly on the surface of the substrate slowly and deliberately in a back and forth motion. The entire 10 cm * 10 cm area was covered in 7-10 strokes. The swab was transferred on a funnel placed over 100 mL volumetric flask. Subsequently the applicator was removed and cotton was extract with the recovery of solvent till the volume reached 100 mL absorbance of solution was measured at 229 nm with a view to estimate Amoxycillin Trihydrate. (Table 9)

 

TABLE VII: LIMIT OF QUANTIFICATION AND LIMIT OF DETECTION DATA

Limit of Quantification

Limit of Detection

1 mcg/mL

0.33 mcg/mL

 

Acceptance criteria:

Each company is responsible for establishing limits that are practical and achievable and have scientific basis. Residue limits established as an acceptance criterion in this facility is 10 mcg/sq cm, recommended by USFDA guidelines8 and Lilly crieteria9.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Validation of assay method:

It was observed that the assay method for estimation of Amoxycillin Trihydrate is accurate and precise (% RSD < 2 %). Further the limit of detection and limit of quantification was found to be 0.33 mcg/mL and 1 mcg/mL respectively (Table 3-7).

 

FIG.1: CALIBRATION CURVE OF AMOXYCILLIN TRIHYDRATE

 

Recovery Studies:           

Recovery studies were conducted for drug under study using swab and rinse water method for recovery of Amoxycillin Trihydrate (Table 8). Due to less suitability of rinse water method for certain manufacturing equipments, most encapsulation equipment and other equipment which can not been completely rinsed without risking damage to electrical components and instrumentation. The FDA guide to inspection for cleaning validation notes that “The firm should challenge the analytical method in combination with the sampling method(s) used to show that contamination can be recovered from the equipment surfaces and at what level, i.e., 50 % to 90 % recovery.” It has been reported that the recovery of greater than 80 % is good. If recovery is greater then 50 % it may be acceptable. However, if the recovery is less than 50 %, questions arise and the source of poor

recovery should be investigated. In our study good swab recovery was obtained with respect to Amoxycillin Trihydrate (91.84 %).


TABLE VIII: RECOVERY OF AMOXYCILLIN TRIHYDRATE FROM SWAB AND RINSE WATER

Concentration

Absorbance (Swab)

% Recovery (Swab)

Absorbance (Rinse water)

%  Recovery  (Rinse water)

5 mcg/mL

0.106

92.17

0.110

95.65

10 mcg/mL

0.210

90.90

0.225

97.39

15 mcg/mL

0.320

92.47

0.335

96.81

 

Cleaning Validation:

Table 9 shows the results of visual observation of three sets of product of Amoxycillin Trihydrate Capsules. It is evident from the results that sampling point such as lid of drug blender, outlet and gasket of the sifter, platform of SA9 filling machine of Capsule department were found having high level of Amoxycillin Trihydrate residue as compared to acceptance limit (2.66 mcg/mL). In Capsule department high degree of residue was also observed with respect to AHU and manufacturing area at first changeover (A). At third changeover (C) practically all the equipments and manufacturing area were found having residue within acceptance limit.

 

CONCLUSION:

The present study was under taken to assess the effectiveness of  cleaning procedure being used in one of the WHO approved Pharmaceutical plant in Gujarat having common facilities for manufacture of dosage forms of Beta Lactam group of antibiotics where there is a risk of potential hazards of cross contamination. Cleaning validation studies were carried according to the cleaning validation protocol. The study showed good swabs recovery (91.84 %). The actives residue values on different sampling point were found within acceptance limit of 10mcg/sqcm   recommended by USFDA guidelines and Lilly criteria. It may be concluded that the cleaning procedure being used in Beta Lactam manufacturing plant was found satisfactory.

 


TABLE IX: AMOXYCILLIN TRIHYDRATE (CAPSULE) RESIDUE LEVEL AT DIFFERENT SAMPLING POINT

Acceptance limit (mcg/sq cm)

10 mcg/sq cm

Equipment

Sampling point

A    mcg/sq cm

B    mcg/sq cm

C    mcg/sq cm

Mean mcg/sq cm

S.D.

Drum Blender

D1:Lid

D2:Inside

2.94

1.60

1.51

0.99

0.69

ND

1.71

0.86

1.13

0.80

Sifter

F1:Outlet

F2:Gasket

F3:Periphery

2.42

3.76

2.12

1.29

1.38

1.08

ND

0.73

0.86

1.23

1.95

1.35

1.21

1.59

0.67

SA9 Filling machine

A1:Hopper

A2:Platform

1.51

3.89

0.82

2.20

ND

0.99

0.77

2.36

0.75

1.45

Polishing machine

P1:Polishing brush

P2:Sorter unit

3.37

2.16

2.77

0.90

0.77

ND

2.30

1.02

1.36

1.08

Blister packing machine

T1:Hopper

T2:Channel

3.03

2.07

2.72

2.38

0.95

1.47

2.23

1.97

1.12

0.46

AHU

A1:Supply grill

A2:Return grill

15.15

11.16

6.58

6.36

2.25

2.81

7.99

6.77

6.56

4.19

Area

Door

Floor

Wall

Window

9.09

4.28

8.05

3.20

2.29

5.06

4.37

3.67

2.55

0.64

1.99

1.03

4.64

3.32

4.80

2.63

3.85

2.35

3.05

1.40

Acceptance limit: 2.66 mcg/mL                    

ND- Not detected

A.     Symoxyl (Amoxycillin Trihydrate) Capsule: 250 mg to Gerfex (Cephalaxin) capsule: 250 mg

B.      Symoxyl (Amoxycillin Trihydrate) Capsule: 250 mg to Gerfex (Cephalaxin) capsule: 500 mg

C.      Symoxyl (Amoxycillin Trihydrate) Capsule: 250 mg to Gerfex (Cephalaxin) capsule: 500 mg


 

REFERENCES:

1.      Dey et al. cleaning validation studies in a bulk drug plant and method validation of Isoxupirne Hydrochloride. Indian Drugs. 2003; 40(4): 211-214.

2.      Forsyth RJ and Haynes DC. Cleaning validation in Pharmaceutical Research Facility. Pharm Tech. 1998;  22(9): 104-112.

3.      21 CFR 211.67 Equipment cleaning and maintenance,

www.pharmcast.com/cGMPNotes/#Cephalosporin

4.      Dang et al. cleaning validation of liquid orals. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2002; 65 (3): 213-216.

5.      Point to consider for cleaning validation, PDA Journal of Pharm Sci and Tech, Technical Report 29, (1998) 52(6): 1-23.

6.      William E and Hall A. Simple way to establish acceptance criteria for validation studies. J. Validation Technology. 1999;  5(2): 14-18.

7.      Nash RA. Introduction, Pharmaceutical Process Validation. I R Berry, RA Nash (Eds). 2nd Edition, Marshal Dekker INC, USA, (1993), p.xiii.

8.      Krull I; Swartz. M. “Cleaning Validation”, Analytical Abstracts, 4G21 (2002).

 

 

 

Received on 21.10.2008           Modified on 15.12.2008

Accepted on 06.01.2009          © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2(1): Jan.-Mar. 2009; Page147-150