Effect of Gamma Irradiation on Microbial Load of Kalmegh

 

Mamatha A.1* and Kalpana S. Patil2

1Dept. of Pharmacognosy, KLE University’s College of Pharmacy, Rajajinagar II Block, Bangalore 560 010.    

2Department of Pharmacognosy, KLE University’s College of Pharmacy, Nehru Nagar, Belgaum 590 010.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: mamathasmitha@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

Whole plant powder of Kalmegh (Andrographis paniculata) was exposed to gamma irradiation at doses of 5 and 10 kGy in a Co 60 irradiator. Irradiated and unirradiated samples were stored at room temperature.  Microbial load of whole plant powder were evaluated at 0, 6 and 12 months of storage.  Results indicated that gamma irradiation reduced the total aerobic count and total fungal count in comparison to the non-irradiated sample.  Further, the non-irradiated samples showed the presence of E.coli and Staphylococcus aureus.  On irradiation there was a drastic reduction in E.coli and Staphylococcus aureus.  Microbial load was found to be increased after 6 and 12 months of storage in the non-irradiated samples, where as there were no significant differences in the irradiated samples. A dose of 5 kGy could reduce the microbial load to acceptable levels, where as commercial sterility could be obtained at a dose of 10kGy. Thus, gamma irradiation can be used as a suitable technique for microbial decontamination of phytopreparations and products of Kalmegh and thus increase their shelf life and stability.

 

KEYWORDS: Kalmegh, Gamma irradiation, microbial load, shelf life, stability, microbial decontamination.

 

 


 

1. INTRODUCTION:

Kalmegh (Andrographis paniculata) is widely used in Indian and Chinese system of medicine1. The plant is mainly used for liver diseases. Leaves are used in general debility, dyspepsia, stomach ailments in infants, griping. The roots are used as a tonic, stimulant and aperient. Whole plant finds its use as antispasmodic, febrifuge, stomachic, alternative, anthelmintic, anodyne, antiseptic, choleretic, cholagogue, diphoretic, expectorant, depurative, immunostimulant, laxative, astringent and antipyretic. They are used in the treatment of jaundice, diabetes, malaria, cholera, dysentery, enteritis, gastritis, pneumonia, pyelonephritis, hyperdipsia, flatulence, colic, diarrhoea, haemorrhoids and oedema.

 

Reports have shown that the plant possess hepatoprotective anthelmentic, antidiaarrhoeal, antimalarial, antiviral, antipyretic, antiatherosclerotic, hypotensive, immunomodulator , antifertility  and other activities2-4.

 

Non-standardised herbal preparation does not get accepted in the global market.  It becomes wrong to assume that the biological agents are safe because they are natural. 

 

The microbial content of herb is one of the most important parameters as they make the heel potentially dangerous for sensitive population. One of the major problems associated with herbs is its microbial contamination resulting in quality deteriorations5-13.  Inspite of substantial efforts to avoid microbial contamination, an upward trend in non-acceptance of herbals are reported.  Several decontamination methods exist, but the most versatile treatment among them is the processing of herbs with gamma irradiation.  Microbial decontamination of herbal products by gamma irradiation is a safe, efficient, environmentally clean and energy efficient process14-25

 

Gamma irradiation at doses of 2-10 kGy has shown to be effective in eliminating pathogenic non-spore forming bacteria including other pathogens like Salmonella, Staphylococcus, Pseudomonas E.coli and others. With today’s demand for high quality herbs, gamma irradiation holds a promise for enhancing its safety and quality.

 

While exposure to gamma rays offers an effective alternative means of reducing microbial contamination, the dose increased to the extent of microbial kill has to be checked and also the method should be suitable to effectively reduce the microorganism and maintain this for a longer period.

 

 

Although gamma irradiation has been found as a suitable technique for microbial decontamination, there are no studies related to microbial decontamination of gamma irradiated Kalmegh.  Accordingly, the objective of this study was to examine the effect on microbial contamination of irradiated samples of Kalmegh at 0, 6 and 12 months of storage.

 

2.MATERIALS AND METHODS:

2.1. Plant materials:

Whole plant of Kalmegh was procured from Natural remedies, Bangalore.  The herb was identified and authenticated by Dr. Vasundhara, Professor. Department of horticulture GKVK, Bangalore and voucher specimen deposited.  They were further ground to powder and kept at ambient temperature.

 

2.2    Preparation of extracts:

100 g of coarsely powdered samples were packed in 9 different sterile polythene bags at ambient temperature. Gamma irradiation was carried out at a commercial scale Cobalt 60 irradiation service facility loaded with Cobalt 60 source with strength of 398 kilocuries (KCi), owned and operated by Microtrol sterilization services Pvt.ltd. at Bangalore.  The applied dose levels were 5 and 10 kGy and this absorbed dose was monitored with ceric/cerous dosimeters. Three packets were kept as such (K1- non-irradiated), three packs were gamma irradiated at a dose of 5 kGy (K2) and remaining three packets were gamma irradiated at a dose of 10 kGy (K3).  1st set of sample (K1, K2& K3) were analysed soon after irradiation, second set was analysed after 6 months of storage and the third set was analysed after 12 months of storage.

 

2.3 Media for microbial studies: Total aerobic count was enumerated on nutrients agar (Hi media) and total fungal count on Sabourad’s dextrose agar. E.coli was tested on Macconkey agar and EMB agar, Selenite F broth and Brilliant green agar were the media’s for Salmonella, bismuth sulphite agar and certrimide broth were the selective medias used for determination of Pseudomonas and Staphylococcus aureus was tested on Mannitol salt agar and Vogel-Johnson medium. All the individual organisms were analysed as per the procedure given in IP26.

 

2.4 Sampling and enumeration:

I. Total microbial load: 1 gm of each sample was suspended in 10 ml of respective medias.  To determine total aerobic count the sample was incubated at 370 +10 C for 24-48 hrs and for total fungal count – samples were incubated at 28+1ºC. Plates were examined for microbial growth, the number of colonies were counted and expressed in terms of colony forming units per gm (cfu/gm).  Duplicate plates of appropriate dilutions were plated for specific organisms with there respective medias and incubated at 37º +1ºC for 24-48 hrs.

 

II.   Identification test for Escherichia Coli:

1 gm of test substance was placed in a sterile screw-capped container with 10 ml of nutrient broth, shaken and incubated at 370C for 18 to 24 hours.

a) Primary test: 0.1 ml of the enrichment culture was spread on MacConkey agar plate using sterile autoclaved spreader uniformly maintaining aseptic conditions, in laminar airflow cabinet. Plates were incubated at 370 C ±10 C.

b) Secondary tests: 0.1 ml of the enrichment culture was spread on EMB agar plates using sterile autoclaved spreader uniformly maintaining aseptic conditions, in laminar air flow cabinet. Simultaneously 0.1 ml of enrichment culture was incorporated in tubes containing 5 ml of peptone water. Plates and tubes were incubated at 370C±10C, examined for the formation of metallic sheen in the agar plates and formation of indole (To test for indole add 0.5 ml of Kovac’s reagent, shake well, and allow to stand for one minute; if a red colour is produced in the reagent layer - indole is present). The formation of metallic sheen and indole in the secondary test indicates the presence of Escherichia coli.

 

III. Identification test for Salmonella:

1 gm of test substance was placed in a sterile screw-capped container with 10 ml of nutrient broth, shaken and incubated at 370 C for 1 hr (4 hours for gelatin).

a) Primary test: Added 1.0 ml of the enrichment culture to tubes containing 10 ml of Selenite F broth and incubated at 370 C   for 24 hours. Tubes were observed for the microbial growth and for the colour of the broth. Microbial growth with no colour in tubes shows presence of salmonella.

b) Secondary test: Cultures from the preliminary test tubes were inoculated on to the brilliant green agar and bismuth sulphite agar plates. Plates were incubated at 370 C for 24 hr. Small, transparent and colourless, or opaque, pinkish or white (frequently surrounded by a pink or red zone) colonies on brilliant green agar and black or green colonies on bismuth sulphite agar confirms the presence of Salmonella typhi.

 

IV. Identification test for Pseudomonas:

a)       Preliminary test: 1 gm of the sample was placed in a sterile screw capped jar containing 10 ml of Cetrimide broth

and incubated at 370 C for 24 hours. Subcultured on a plate containing a layer of Cetrimide agar and incubated at

370C for 24-48 hours, examined for the growth by Gram’s stain.

b)       Secondary test: Since the preliminary test for Pseudomonas was negative, the confirmatory secondary tests were not performed.

 

V. Identification test for Staphylococcus aureus:

1 gm of sample placed in a sterile screw capped jar containing 10 ml of nutrient broth and incubated at 37°C for 24 hours. Subcultured on a plate containing a layer of mannitol salt agar medium and Vogel-Johnson agar medium and incubated at 37ºC for 24 hours. Yellow colonies in mannitol salt agar medium and black colonies surrounded by yellow zones in Vogel-Johnson agar medium indicate the presence of Staphylococcus aureus.

 

3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Total microbial load and the effect of gamma irradiation on non-irradiated and gamma irradiated Kalmegh samples were evaluated and are shown in Graph 1.

 

Graph 1: Details of total microbial load in the Kalmegh samples at 0, 6 and 12 months of storage.

 

Before irradiation, total aerobic bacteria (1x103 cfu/gm) and total fungal count (1x102 cfu/gm) were quite high.  On subjecting to specific pathogen tests as per IP, non-irradiated samples showed the presence of E.coli (3.4 x 104cfu/gm) and Staphylococcus aureus (2.9x105cfu/gm).  Salmonella and Pseudomonas were totally absent in all the samples (Table 1). On gamma irradiating the samples at 5 kGy and 10 kGy, there was a drastic reduction in microorganism. In samples irradiated at a dose of 5 kGy initially there was reduction in total bacterial count from 1x103 cfu/gm  to 1.3x102 cfu/gm and the total fungal count from 1x102 cfu/gm to acceptable levels. However, the specific microorganisms (E.coli and Staphylococcus aureus) were totally absent in samples K2 and K3. (Graph 2 and 3. Pictures of E.coli on Macconkey and EMB agar are shown in Photo 1 and 2 and pictures of Staphylococcus on Mannitol and Vogel Johnson media are shown in Photo 3 and 4.

 

Graph 2: E.coli in Kalmegh samples at 0, 6 and 12 months of storage.

 

Graph 3: Staphylococcus in Kalmegh samples at 0, 6 and 12 months of storage.

 

Photo 1 - E.coli on EMB agar in samples of Kalmegh.

 

Photo 2 - E.coli on Macconkey agar in samples of Kalmegh.

 

Photo 3 - Staphylococcus aureus on Mannitol

 

Photo 4 - Staphylococcus aureus on Vogel Johnson

 

Further after 6 and 12 months of storage, the total bacterial count (1.4x103 cfu/gm and 1.6x103 cfu/gm respectively) and total fungal count (1.2x102cfu/gm and 1.3x102cfu/gm respectively) were increased compared to 0 month analysis (Graph 1). Pathogenic organism during 6 and 12 months storage also drastically increased to - E.coli (3.4 x 104cfu/gm and 3.5 x 104cfu/gm respectively) and Staphylococcus aureus (2.9x105cfu/gm and 3.0x105cfu/gm respectively), where as gamma irradiated samples maintained their quality by showing no microbial contamination (Graph 2 and 3).

 

In samples irradiated at a dose of 5 kGy initially there was reduction in total bacterial count from and total fungal count to acceptable levels. However, the specific microorganisms -E.coli and Staphylococcus aureus were totally absent in samples K2 and K3.

This research clearly indicates that Kalmegh plant sample is highly contaminated. On testing for specific pathogens, Kalmegh samples were positive for presence of E.coli and Staphylococcus. Values exceeded drastically on storing it upto 12 months16. The high contamination level could be attributed to the natural microflora of the herb as well as the general conditions during cultivation, harvesting, drying, handling, processing, storage, distribution and sales27.  Gamma irradiation was found to be an effective technology for resolving technical trade issue (WHO 199428, FDA 200129) and thus increase the quality of Kalmegh. The killing effect of irradiation can be attributed to the ionization of water, which results in forming highly reactive radicals such as H, OH etc. These free radicals split carbon bonds of macromolecules such as DNA in living organisms, thereby killing them30. They also destroy the chemical bonds by interacting with electrons of atomic constituents. Samples irradiated at 5kGy and 10kGy had significantly lower levels of microbes than the non-irradiated (control) even at 12th month study31. 5kGy could significantly lower the microbes to acceptable levels, however complete sterility could be attained at a dose of 10kGy.

 

4. CONCLUSION: 

A dose of 5kGy could significantly reduce the microbial load to acceptable limits. However, commercial sterility could be attained at a dose of 10kGy.

 

Gamma irradiated samples could maintain their stability upto 12 months from the time of irradiation, which clearly indicates that the shelf life of the products can be increased upto 12 months.

 

The effect of gamma irradiation on the elimination or control of microorganisms on Kalmegh powder is in agreement with that of Migdal et al32 according to whom an ionizing radiation of 10kGy could give satisfactory results pertaining to microbiological decontamination of medicinal herbs.

 

Thus, gamma irradiation at doses of 5kGy and 10kGy helps in extending shelf-life of Kalmegh plant samples, ensures its microbial safety and helps in overcoming quarantine barriers to international trade. Further, gamma irradiation has got the advantages of its Dosimetric release, where the products can be sterilized in its final pack and released to the market even without post sterility testing, its single exposure makes it economical and these products can compete in global market.

 

 


 

Table 1: Compiled results for pathogen detection in Kalmegh samples during 0, 6 and 12 months of storage.

Sl. No

Name of the sample

Pathogens tested

E. coli

Salmonella

Pseudomonas

Staphylococcus aureus

1

K-1

+

-

-

+

2

K-2

-

-

-

-

3

K-3

-

-

-

-

“+”= Present          “-” = Absent

 

 


5. REFERENCES:

1.        Tripathi KA, Shukla YN and Kumar S, Kalmegh [Andrographis paniculata Dunal (Solanacea)]: A status report. J. Med Aromat Plant Sci. 18 (1996), 46-62.

2.        World Health Organisation, The use of traditional medicine in primary healthcare. AIIBS publishers, New Delhi. 1992.

3.        SN Yoganarasimhan, Medicinal Plants of India, (Interline Publishing Private Limited, Bangalore, 2000).

4.        DV Rangari. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry Part II. 1st edition. Career Publications, Nashik. 2003.

5.        Knife W, Czech E and Kopp B. Microbial contamination of medicinal plants--a review. Planta Med. 68 (2002). 5-15.

6.        Martins HM, Martins ML and Dais MI. Evaluation of microbiological quality of medicinal plants used in natural infusions. Into J Food Microbial. 68 (2001). 149-153.

7.        Czech C, Kneifel W and Kopp B. Microbiological status of commercially available medicinal herbal drugs--a screening study., Planta Med. 67 (2001). 263-269.

8.        Alexander RG, Wilson DA and Davidson AG.  Medicines Control Agency investigation of the microbial quality of herbal products. Pharm. J. Verwoodburg, 259 (1997). .259-261.

9.        Hirokoto H, Moroxumi S and Wauke T. Fungal contamination and mycotoxin detection of powdered herbal drugs. Appl Environ Microbiol. 36 (1978). 252-256.

10.     Favet J.  Microbial contamination of twenty drugs of plant origin.  Pharm Acta Helv. 67(9-10) (1992). 250-258.

11.     Efuntoye MO. Fungi associated with herbal drug plants during storage. Mycopathologia. 136(2) (1996-1997). 115-118.

12.     Adeleye IA, Okogi G and Ojo EO. Microbial contamination of herbal preparations in Lagos, Nigeria. J health Popul Nutr. 23(3) (2005). .296-297.

13.     Adriana B, Adriana AB, Cristina TN et al. Evaluation of microbiological contamination of crude herbal drugs. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Farm. 41(4) (2005). 491-497.

14.     Renata RS, Lucilia CS and Terezinha JP. Effects of ionizing radiation in ginkgo and guarana. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 73(4) (2005). 239-242.

15.     Misal KK, Nizakat B, Amal BK,et al. Effect of irradiation on Microbial Safety and Nutritional Quality of Minimally Processed Bitter Gourd. Journal of Food Science. 70 (5) (2005). M255.

16.     Wannipa P, Sirirat R and Wichai C. Gamma irradiation versus microbial   contamination of Thai medicinal herbs. J. Sci. Technol. 29(1) (2007). 157-66.

17.     Muhammet A, Ferya AC and Umit G. Effect of gamma irradiation on microbiological and oil properties of black cumin (Nigella sativa). 58(4) (2007). .339-343.

18.     Prasad. SV, Bandyopadhyay C and Thomas P.  Effect of γ-irradiation on the volatile oil constituents of some Indian spices.  Food Research International. 31(2) (1998). 105-109.

19.     Suchandra C, Prasad SV and Achyut SG. Effect of γ -irradiation on the volatile oil constituents of turmeric (Curcuma longa).  Food Research International. 33 (2000). 103-106.

20.     Hye-young S, Jun-Hyoung K and Hyun-Pa S. Effect of gamma irradiation on the yields of volatile extracts of Angelica gigas Nakai,. Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 76(11-12) (2007). .1869-1874,

21.     Al-Bachir M. Effect of gamma irradiation on microbial load and sensory characters of aniseed (Pimpinella anisum).  Bioresource technology. 98(10) (2007). 1871-1876.

22.     Al-Bachri M. Effect of gamma irradiation on fungal load, chemical and sensory characteristics of walnuts (Juglans regia L). Journal of stored Products Research. 40(4) (2004). .355-362.

23.     Al-Bachir M, Al-Adawi MA and Al-Kaid A.  Effect of gamma irradiation on microbiological, chemical and sensory characteristics of licorice root product: of stored products. Radiation Physics and Chemistry.  69(4) (2004). .333-338.

24.     Hsiao-Wei W, Hsiao-Ping C and Fong-I C.  Effect of gamma irradiation on microbial decontamination and chemical and sensory characteristic of lycium fruit.  Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 75(2) (2006). .322-328.

25.     Branka K, Boris N and Dusan R.  Microbiological decontamination of botanical raw materials and corresponding pharmaceuticals products by irradiation.  Radiation Physics and Chemistry. 62(2-3) (2001). 261-275.

26.     Indian Pharmacopoeia, Vol. 2, A-100. Govt. of India, Controller of Publications, New Delhi, 1996.

27.     Knifel W, Czech E, and Kopp B. Microbial contamination of medicinal plants--a review. Planta Med. 68(2002). 5-15.

28.     WHO, Safety and Nutritional Adequacy of Irradiated Food. World Health Organization, Geneva. 1994.

29.     Food and Drug Admistration. U.S Regulatory Requirements for Irradiating Foods. Office of Food Additive Safety, Gaithersburg, MD, 2001.

30.     Abdel-Khalek HH. Effect of gamma irradiation on the microbial, chemical quality and the biological activity of some spices and herbs. Ph. D. thesis, Cairo University, Egypt. 2008.

31.     Tiengthavaj, Y, Jetawattana, S, Sripaoraya, K., et al. Reducing microbial contamination in herbal cosmetics and raw materials from natural source gamma radiation. Cosmetics Control Division, The Food and Drug Administration, Bangkok, Thailand. 1998.

32.     Migdal W, Owczarczyk B, KedziaB  et al. The effect of ionizing radiation on microbiological decontamination of medical herbs and biologically active compounds. Radiation Physics and Chemistry52 (1-6) (1998). 91-94.

 

 

 

 

Received on 07.04.2011          Modified on 10.04.2011

Accepted on 14.04.2011         © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 4(6): June 2011; Page 982-986