ISSN 0974-3618
(Print) www.rjptonline.org
0974-360X (Online)
RESEARCH ARTICLE
A Novel Stability Indicating
HPLC Assay Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Clopidogrel and Aspirin in
Tablet dosage form by Using Core shell Technology column
Mahesh
HRK*, Dr K Sudhakar Babu
Department of Chemistry, Sri
Krishnadevaraya University, Anantapur -515055, Andhra Pradesh. India
*Corresponding
Author E-mail: hrkmahesh@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
A
novel, rapid and a stability-indicating reverse phase LC method has been
developed and validated for the simultaneous estimation of Clopidogrel and
Aspirin in tablet dosage form. The
chromatographic separation was achieved on a novel core shell technology phenyl
hexyl stationary phase of particle size 2.6µ. The method employed a linear
gradient elution and the detection wavelength was set at 220nm. The proposed
method was extensively validated as per ICH guidelines. The specificity of the
method was proved by performing forced degradation studies. Regression analysis
shows r value (correlation
coefficient) of greater than 0.999 for individual active drug substances.
Accuracy was proved in the range of 50% to 150% of working range.
KEYWORDS: Clopidogrel, Aspirin, Core shell, Simultaneous
estimation and Stability indicating.
INTRODUCTION:
Clopidogrel
bisulfate (CLP) is chemically designated as thieno [3, 2-c]
pyridine-5(4H)-acetic acid, alpha-(2 chlorophenyl)-6, 7-dihydro-methyl
ester(S)-sulphate (1:1) [Figure 1] an ADP antagonist. It is used as an anti
thrombic agent1.
Aspirin
(ASP) is chemically designated as 2-acetyloxybenzoic acid [Figure 2] is often
used as an analgesic, antipyretic, anti-inflammatory and antiplatelet. It
suppresses the production of prostaglandins and thromboanes due to inactivation
of cyclooxygenas enzyme 2.
Different
dosage forms of CLP and ASP are available as single or combination dosage
forms. The literature survey revealed several analytical methods such as
spectrometry, HPTLC, HPLC and LC-MS have been reported for the determination of
CLP and ASP in pharmaceutical dosage forms, individually or in combination and
in biological samples 1-17. To our present knowledge, there is no
method reported for the simultaneous estimation of CLP and ASP in formulation
by using a stability indicating HPLC method with core shell technology column.
Received on 17.12.2014 Modified on 05.01.2015
Accepted on 10.01.2015 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech.
8(2): Feb. 2015; Page 172-176
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00031.1
Hence
the aim was to develop a sensitive, simple, accurate, stability indicating
assay method by using a new breakthrough in column technology i.e. core shell
technology.
Columns
packed with sub-2 micron, totally porous particles are very wide spread
nowadays to conduct fast and efficient separation. However sub-2 micron has few
limitations with respect to instrumentation. To overcome this limitation, but
by not compromising on fast and efficient separation core shell technology
columns with sub-3 microns are the better solution. These columns can be
effectively used in regular HPLC instruments also.
In the present work forced degradation
study with peak purity concept and confirming the separation of known
impurities from the analytes was used to prove the stability indicating power
of the assay method.
|
|
Figure
: 1Chemical structure of Clopidogrel |
Figure:
2 Chemical structure of Aspirin |
MATERIALS AND
METHODS:
Chemicals and reagents:
All the reagents were of AR or HPLC grade
unless stated otherwise. HPLC grade
water was utilized throughout the experiment. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate,
Diammonium hydrogen phosphate and octane -1 sulfonic acid sodium salt all these
chemicals from Merck India, Methanol and Acetonitrile were taken from Rankem India were used. CLP Standard,
ASP standard, and tablet dosage form were obtained from Hetero Labs Ltd
(Hyderabad, India).
Equipment:
High
performance Liquid chromatography system (from Waters) with, auto sampler and
with photo diode array (PDA) detector was used for the study. Data was
collected and processed by using Waters Empower software.
Chromatographic Conditions:
The
analysis was carried out on Kinetex phenyl hexyl, 100x4.6 mm, 2.6mm particle size. The column Oven
temperature was maintained at 35°C. The mobile phase A consists of diammonium
hydrogen phosphate salt (1.32gm per Liter), and octane -1 sulphonic sodium salt
(2gm per Liter), pH adjusted to 2.3±0.05. A mixture of Acetonitrile and
Methanol in the ratio of 50:50 was used as Mobile phase B. Flow rate was set to
1.0 mL/minute in gradient elution mode. Gradient time program was set as T/%B:
0/30, 2/45, 4/55, 10/55, 11/30 and 15/30. Before delivering the mobile phase
into the system, it was degassed and filtered through 0.22 µm filters using vacuum.
The injection volume was 10µL and the detection was performed at 220nm using
PDA detector. The typical retention times of ASP and CLP are 2.6 minutes and 8
minutes respectively in the final optimized conditions [Figure 3]. The
criticality of this method are to elute both the active ingredients with
optimum separation and symmetric peak shapes with no interference due to
placebo or any known and potential
impurities arising due to degradation during shelf life.
Figure:
3 Typical Chromatogram of Standard.
Sample Preparation:
Diluent Preparation:
1.36 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate was dissolved in 1000 mL water
and pH
adjusted to 2.5±0.05. Prepared a degassed mixture
of this buffer and acetonitrile in the ratio of 55:45 %v/v respectively.
Standard Preparation:
Standard
Stock Solution was prepared by weighing accurately 49 mg of CLP and 50 mg ASP
standard in 100 ml volumetric flask, added about 60 mL diluent ,sonicated to
dissolve and diluted to volume with diluent. Working Standard solution was
prepared by diluting 5 ml of stock solution to 50 ml with diluent and mixed
well.
Test Preparation:
Crushed 10 tablets (Hetero labs Ltd.) into a
fine powder, transferred powder equivalent to 50 mg ASP in to a 100ml
volumetric flask, added about 60 ml diluent and sonicated for not less than 30
minutes with intermediate shaking. Care was taken during sonication to avoid
the heating. Diluted to volume with diluent and mixed well. Filtered a portion of solution through
0.45µm membrane filters.
Further diluted 5.0 mL of this solution into a 50 mL volumetric flask, diluted to
volume with diluent and mixed well.
Experimental Design:
Method
Validation:
The aim of method validation was to confirm that the present method was
suitable for its intended purpose as described in ICH guidelines 18.
The described method has been extensively validated in terms of specificity,
precision, linearity, accuracy and robustness. The precision was expressed in
terms of coefficient of variation (RSD) calculated from % assay results. The
accuracy was expressed in terms of percent recovery of the known amount of
analytes added to the placebo.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:
System
suitability:
System suitability tests are an
integral part of a liquid chromatographic method. As integral part of
chromatographic method system suitability parameters like USP Tailing,
Theoretical plates and Relative standard deviation (RSD) for replicate
injections were evaluated and found to be satisfactory as per common
chromatographic practices. According to the results presented, the proposed
method fulfills these requirements within the accepted limits Results are shown
in Table No 1.
Table
1: Results of System Suitability Test
Name of Drug substances |
Theoretical plates |
USP Tailing factor |
%RSD for replicate injections |
Aspirin |
6306 |
1.1 |
0.1 |
Clopidogrel |
30881 |
1.0 |
0.1 |
Specificity:
Specificity is the ability to assess unequivocally the analytes in the
presence of components which may be expected to be present. Typically these
might include impurities, degradents, matrix (placebo), etc. Specificity was
tested by injecting the standards individually, placebo preparation, Impurities
and Forced degradation samples. Known impurities were spiked in test solution
and injected. They found to be well separated from both peaks of interests
[Figure. 4].
Forced degradation studies were performed to provide an indication of
the stability indicating property and specificity of the proposed method.
Intentional degradation was attempted to stress conditions like acid hydrolysis
(using 1 N HCl), base hydrolysis (using 1 N NaOH), and oxidative degradation
(using 3% H2O2) to evaluate the ability of the proposed method to separate
degradation products from active ingredients. To check and ensure the
homogeneity (peak purity) of peaks in the stressed sample solutions, PDA
detector was employed. In forced degradation it was observed that ASP is
susceptible for degradation in acid and base stress conditions, where as CLP
susceptible for peroxide stress condition.
Peak purity in all the degradation conditions has been proved for the
both analytes. Results are tabulated in Table No 2
Figure
4: Typical Chromatogram of Spiked sample with Impurities
Table 2: Results of Forced
degradation Studies with Peak purity details
Stress Conditions |
Aspirin |
Clopidogrel |
||
PA |
PT |
PA |
PT |
|
Acid Degradation |
0.201 |
0.359 |
0.191 |
0.392 |
Alkali Degradation |
0.152 |
0.334 |
0.167 |
0.369 |
Peroxide Degradation |
0.214 |
0.331 |
0.181 |
0.377 |
PA = Purity Angle, PT= Purity
Threshold
Note:
Purity Angle should be less than Purity Threshold to meet Peak purity criteria
acceptance criteria
Linearity:
The linearity of the method was tested in
order to demonstrate proportional relationship of detector response versus
analyte concentration over the working range. It is usual practice to perform
linearity experiments over a wide range of analyte. This gives confidence that
the detector response and concentration are proportional and consequently
ensures that calculations can be performed using a single reference
standard/working standard, rather than the equation of a calibration line.
The linearity of detector response to
different concentrations of both active ingredients was studied by preparing a
series of solutions using CLP and ASP standards. The data were subjected to
statistical analysis using a linear-regression model. The results have
indicated good linearity. Results are shown in Table No 3.
Table
3: Results of Linearity Studies
(Response Vs Concentration)
Name of Drug substances |
Correlation coefficient |
Slope |
Intercept |
Aspirin |
0.999 |
21573 |
438.4 |
Clopidogrel |
0.999 |
21830 |
4476.5 |
Precision:
Six sample solutions were
prepared using single sample Lot of CLP and ASP tablets and the precision of
the method was tested. The % relative standard deviation (RSD) indicates that
proposed method has got an acceptable level of repeatability. Results indicate
the proposed method has got a good precision. Results are tabulated in Table No 4.
Table
4: Precision data
Active Name |
Mean % Assay |
%RSD |
Aspirin |
101.4 |
0.2 |
Clopidogrel |
100.8 |
0.2 |
N= six
sample preparations
Accuracy:
Accuracy
of the proposed method was established by recovery experiments. This study was
employed by spiking of known amounts of active ingredients into the placebo
samples of at 50%, 100% and 150% of targeted concentration, in triplicate and
injected into the chromatographic system. The resulting mixtures were analyzed
as described in proposed method. Results obtained from recovery studies are
given in Table No 5.
Table
5: Results of Recovery Study at Different Levels
Name of Drug substances |
50% level |
100% level |
150% level |
Aspirin |
100.5 |
100.5 |
100.3 |
Clopidogrel |
100.5 |
100.2 |
100.5 |
Note: Number of samples analyzed
at each level is in triplicate
Robustness:
The
robustness of an analytical procedure is a measure of its capacity to remain
unaffected by small, but deliberate, variations in method parameters, and
provides an indication of its reliability during normal usage. In the present
study, an experimental design was planned for robustness testing varying some
conditions, e.g. flow rate, column temperature and variation of buffer pH in
the mobile phase. It can be seen that, with every employed condition, there
were no dramatic changes in the chromatographic behavior. All parameters have
been observed within the limits required for system suitability tests. The
results are shown in Table No 6.
Solution stability:
Solution Stability studies were
performed for Standards and test spiked solution for about 24 hours at 5°C.Results
from this study were compared against initial standard area and % Assay for
test solution. Data indicates that both standard and test solutions are stable at 5°C for about 24 hours with
acceptance criteria of ± 2.0 for both test and standard solution. Results obtained from solution stability
studies are given in Table No 7.
CONCLUSION:
The
validated stability-indicating HPLC method has proved to be simple, accurate,
precise and reliable. The developed method reported herein was validated by
evaluation of the validation parameters as described in ICH guidelines. System
suitability, specificity, linearity, precision, accuracy and robustness of the
proposed technique were obtained during the validation studies. The developed
method is also stability-indicating and can be used for the routine analysis of
combined tablet dosage form of Clopidogrel and Aspirin also check the purity
and stability of the active substance in pharmaceutical dosage forms.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The
authors are thankful to Hetero Labs Ltd, Hyderabad for providing the necessary
facilities to complete this research.
Table 6: Results of Robustness
Study
Parameter |
Deliberate change |
Theoretical plates |
Tailing factor |
||
Aspirin |
Clopidogrel |
Aspirin |
Clopidogrel |
||
Flow rate (1.0mL/min) |
0.8mL/min |
7523 |
45220 |
1.1 |
1.02 |
1.2mL/min |
5503 |
27564 |
1.05 |
1.01 |
|
Temperature (35°C) |
30°C |
7502 |
43205 |
1.05 |
1.02 |
40°C |
5003 |
28034 |
1.05 |
1.01 |
|
pH of buffer (2.3) |
2.1 |
6552 |
40220 |
1.05 |
1.02 |
2.5 |
4856 |
28502 |
1.10 |
1.01 |
Table
7: Results of Solution Stability Studies
Name |
Initial |
After 24 Hours |
Difference from the Initial |
Area of Standard
for Aspirin |
1088036 |
1100018 |
2.2% |
Area of Standard for Clopidogrel |
826193 |
825884 |
4.8% |
% of Aspirin Assay in Test |
101.5 |
101.5 |
0.0 |
% of Clopidogrel Assay in Test |
100.7 |
101 |
0.3 |
References:
1. Mrinalini CD, Purushotam KS, Kailash GB. A
validated stability indicating HPTLC
method for determination of aspirin and clopidogrel bisulphate in combined
dosage form. Eurasian journal of analytical chemistry, 2009: 4(2);152-160.
2. Kaila HO, Ambasana
MA, Shah AK. A simple and rapid Ultra-Performance liquid chromatographic assay
method for the simultaneous determination of Aspirin, Clopidogrel bisulphate
and Atorvastatin calcium in capsule dosage form. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res, 2011: 3
;459-465.
3. Mishra P, Archana D.
Simultaneous determination of clopidogrel and aspirin in pharmaceutical dosage
forms. Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2006: 68(3); 365-368.
4. Anandakumar K, et
al. RP-HPLC analysis of aspirin and clopidogrel bisulphate in
combination. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2007: 69(4); 597-599.
5. Panda, Sagar, S.
Ion-Pairing RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous determination of aspirin and
clopidogrel bisulphate in tablet and capsule dosage form. Int J Pharm Tech Res, 2010: 2 ; 269-273.
6. Kachhadia PK, Ashish
SD, Hitendra SJ. Validated Column High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic
Method for Determination of Aspirin and Clopidogrel in Combined Tablets in the
Presence of Degradation Products Formed Under ICH Recommended Stress
Conditions. Journal of AOAC International. 2008: 92(1); 152-157.
7. Gandhimathi M., Ravi
TK. High performance liquid chromatographic determination of aspirin and
clopidogrel in tablets. Indian
journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2007: 69(1); 123-125
8. Shrivastava PK, et
al. Concurrent estimation of clopidogrel bisulfate and aspirin in tablets by
validated RP-HPLC method. Indian journal of pharmaceutical
sciences.2008: 70(5); 667-669.
9. Londhe SV, et al.
Development and validation of a reversed-phase HPLC method for simultaneous
determination of aspirin, atorvastatin calcium and clopidogrel bisulphate in
capsules. Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2011: 73(1);
23-29.
10. Singh S, Nitin D, Jain
DK. Simultaneous estimation of atorvastatin, clopidogrel and aspirin in capsule
dosage forms using UV-spectroscopy. Asian Journal of Research in
Chemistry.2010: 3(4); 885-887.
11. Himani A., et al.
Stability indicating HPTLC determination of clopidogrel bisulphate as bulk drug
and in pharmaceutical dosage form. Talanta. 61; 2003: 581-589.
12. Durga RD., et al. A
validated stability-indicating normal phase LC method for clopidogrel bisulfate
and its impurities in bulk drug and pharmaceutical dosage form. Journal of
pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2010: 52(1); 160-165.
13. Mohan A., et al.
Identification and characterization of a principal oxidation impurity in
clopidogrel drug substance and drug product. Journal of pharmaceutical and
biomedical analysis, 2008: 47(1) ; 183-189.
14. Fayed AS., et al.
Separation and determination of clopidogrel and its impurities by capillary
electrophoresis. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2009: 49(2);193-200.
15. Londhe SV, et al.
Simultaneous HPTLC analysis of aspirin, atorvastatin calcium and clopidogrel
bisulphate in the bulk drug and in capsules. Acta Chromatographica, 2010: 22(2); 297-305.
16. Kahsay G, AnnVan S,
Erwin A. Development and validation of a liquid chromatographic method for
purity control of clopidogrel–acetylsalicylic acid in combined oral dosage
forms. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2012: 61;
271-276.
17. Alarfaj NA,
Stability-indicating liquid chromatography for determination of clopidogrel
bisulfate in tablets: Application to content uniformity testing. Journal of
Saudi Chemical Society, 2012: 16(1); 23-30.
18. ICH. Q2R1, Validation of analytical
procedures and methodology, In Proceeding of the International Conference on
Harmonization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.