ISSN   0974-3618  (Print)                    www.rjptonline.org

            0974-360X (Online)

                          

RESEARCH ARTICLE

 

A Novel Stability Indicating HPLC Assay Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Clopidogrel and Aspirin in Tablet dosage form by Using Core shell Technology column

 

Mahesh HRK*, Dr K Sudhakar Babu

Department of Chemistry, Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Anantapur -515055, Andhra Pradesh. India

*Corresponding Author E-mail: hrkmahesh@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

A novel, rapid and a stability-indicating reverse phase LC method has been developed and validated for the simultaneous estimation of Clopidogrel and Aspirin in tablet dosage form.  The chromatographic separation was achieved on a novel core shell technology phenyl hexyl stationary phase of particle size 2.6µ. The method employed a linear gradient elution and the detection wavelength was set at 220nm. The proposed method was extensively validated as per ICH guidelines. The specificity of the method was proved by performing forced degradation studies. Regression analysis shows r value (correlation coefficient) of greater than 0.999 for individual active drug substances. Accuracy was proved in the range of 50% to 150% of working range.

 

KEYWORDS: Clopidogrel, Aspirin, Core shell, Simultaneous estimation and Stability indicating.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Clopidogrel bisulfate (CLP) is chemically designated as thieno [3, 2-c] pyridine-5(4H)-acetic acid, alpha-(2 chlorophenyl)-6, 7-dihydro-methyl ester(S)-sulphate (1:1) [Figure 1] an ADP antagonist. It is used as an anti thrombic agent1.

 

Aspirin (ASP) is chemically designated as 2-acetyloxybenzoic acid [Figure 2] is often used as an analgesic, antipyretic, anti-inflammatory and antiplatelet. It suppresses the production of prostaglandins and thromboanes due to inactivation of cyclooxygenas     enzyme 2.

 

Different dosage forms of CLP and ASP are available as single or combination dosage forms. The literature survey revealed several analytical methods such as spectrometry, HPTLC, HPLC and LC-MS have been reported for the determination of CLP and ASP in pharmaceutical dosage forms, individually or in combination and in biological samples 1-17. To our present knowledge, there is no method reported for the simultaneous estimation of CLP and ASP in formulation by using a stability indicating HPLC method with core shell technology column.

 

 

Received on 17.12.2014       Modified on 05.01.2015

Accepted on 10.01.2015      © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 8(2): Feb. 2015; Page 172-176

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00031.1

 

Hence the aim was to develop a sensitive, simple, accurate, stability indicating assay method by using a new breakthrough in column technology i.e. core shell technology.

 

Columns packed with sub-2 micron, totally porous particles are very wide spread nowadays to conduct fast and efficient separation. However sub-2 micron has few limitations with respect to instrumentation. To overcome this limitation, but by not compromising on fast and efficient separation core shell technology columns with sub-3 microns are the better solution. These columns can be effectively used in regular HPLC instruments also.

 

In the present work forced degradation study with peak purity concept and confirming the separation of known impurities from the analytes was used to prove the stability indicating power of the assay method. 

 

Figure : 1Chemical structure of Clopidogrel

Figure: 2 Chemical structure of Aspirin

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Chemicals and reagents:

All the reagents were of AR or HPLC grade unless stated otherwise.  HPLC grade water was utilized throughout the experiment. Potassium dihydrogen phosphate, Diammonium hydrogen phosphate and octane -1 sulfonic acid sodium salt all these chemicals from Merck India, Methanol and Acetonitrile were taken from Rankem India were used. CLP Standard, ASP standard, and tablet dosage form were obtained from Hetero Labs Ltd (Hyderabad, India).

 

Equipment:

High performance Liquid chromatography system (from Waters) with, auto sampler and with photo diode array (PDA) detector was used for the study. Data was collected and processed by using Waters Empower software.

 

Chromatographic Conditions:

The analysis was carried out on Kinetex phenyl hexyl, 100x4.6 mm, 2.6mm particle size. The column Oven temperature was maintained at 35°C. The mobile phase A consists of diammonium hydrogen phosphate salt (1.32gm per Liter), and octane -1 sulphonic sodium salt (2gm per Liter), pH adjusted to 2.3±0.05. A mixture of Acetonitrile and Methanol in the ratio of 50:50 was used as Mobile phase B. Flow rate was set to 1.0 mL/minute in gradient elution mode. Gradient time program was set as T/%B: 0/30, 2/45, 4/55, 10/55, 11/30 and 15/30. Before delivering the mobile phase into the system, it was degassed and filtered through 0.22 µm filters using vacuum. The injection volume was 10µL and the detection was performed at 220nm using PDA detector. The typical retention times of ASP and CLP are 2.6 minutes and 8 minutes respectively in the final optimized conditions [Figure 3]. The criticality of this method are to elute both the active ingredients with optimum separation and symmetric peak shapes with no interference due to placebo or any known and  potential impurities arising due to degradation during shelf life.

 

 

 

Figure: 3 Typical Chromatogram of Standard.

 

 

Sample Preparation:

Diluent Preparation:

1.36 g of potassium dihydrogen phosphate was dissolved in 1000 mL water and pH adjusted to 2.5±0.05. Prepared a degassed mixture of this buffer and acetonitrile in the ratio of 55:45 %v/v respectively.

 

Standard Preparation:

Standard Stock Solution was prepared by weighing accurately 49 mg of CLP and 50 mg ASP standard in 100 ml volumetric flask, added about 60 mL diluent ,sonicated to dissolve and diluted to volume with diluent. Working Standard solution was prepared by diluting 5 ml of stock solution to 50 ml with diluent and mixed well.

 

Test Preparation:

Crushed 10 tablets (Hetero labs Ltd.) into a fine powder, transferred powder equivalent to 50 mg ASP in to a 100ml volumetric flask, added about 60 ml diluent and sonicated for not less than 30 minutes with intermediate shaking. Care was taken during sonication to avoid the heating. Diluted to volume with diluent and mixed well. Filtered a portion of solution through 0.45µm membrane filters. 

 Further diluted 5.0 mL of this solution into a 50 mL volumetric flask, diluted to volume with diluent and mixed well.

 

Experimental Design:

Method Validation:

The aim of method validation was to confirm that the present method was suitable for its intended purpose as described in ICH guidelines 18. The described method has been extensively validated in terms of specificity, precision, linearity, accuracy and robustness. The precision was expressed in terms of coefficient of variation (RSD) calculated from % assay results. The accuracy was expressed in terms of percent recovery of the known amount of analytes added to the placebo.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS:

System suitability:

System suitability tests are an integral part of a liquid chromatographic method. As integral part of chromatographic method system suitability parameters like USP Tailing, Theoretical plates and Relative standard deviation (RSD) for replicate injections were evaluated and found to be satisfactory as per common chromatographic practices. According to the results presented, the proposed method fulfills these requirements within the accepted limits Results are shown in Table No 1.

 

 

Table 1: Results of System Suitability Test

Name of Drug substances

Theoretical plates

USP Tailing factor

%RSD for replicate injections

Aspirin

6306

1.1

0.1

Clopidogrel

30881

1.0

0.1

 

 

                



Specificity:

Specificity is the ability to assess unequivocally the analytes in the presence of components which may be expected to be present. Typically these might include impurities, degradents, matrix (placebo), etc. Specificity was tested by injecting the standards individually, placebo preparation, Impurities and Forced degradation samples. Known impurities were spiked in test solution and injected. They found to be well separated from both peaks of interests [Figure. 4].

 

Forced degradation studies were performed to provide an indication of the stability indicating property and specificity of the proposed method. Intentional degradation was attempted to stress conditions like acid hydrolysis (using 1 N HCl), base hydrolysis (using 1 N NaOH), and oxidative degradation (using 3% H2O2) to evaluate the ability of the proposed method to separate degradation products from active ingredients. To check and ensure the homogeneity (peak purity) of peaks in the stressed sample solutions, PDA detector was employed. In forced degradation it was observed that ASP is susceptible for degradation in acid and base stress conditions, where as CLP susceptible for peroxide stress condition.  Peak purity in all the degradation conditions has been proved for the both analytes. Results are tabulated in Table No 2

 


 

 

 

Figure 4: Typical Chromatogram of Spiked sample with Impurities

 

Table 2: Results of Forced degradation Studies with Peak purity details

Stress Conditions

Aspirin

Clopidogrel

PA

PT

PA

PT

Acid Degradation

0.201

0.359

0.191

0.392

Alkali Degradation

0.152

0.334

0.167

0.369

Peroxide Degradation

0.214

0.331

0.181

0.377

PA = Purity Angle, PT= Purity Threshold

Note: Purity Angle should be less than Purity Threshold to meet Peak purity criteria acceptance criteria

 

 

 


Linearity:

The linearity of the method was tested in order to demonstrate proportional relationship of detector response versus analyte concentration over the working range. It is usual practice to perform linearity experiments over a wide range of analyte. This gives confidence that the detector response and concentration are proportional and consequently ensures that calculations can be performed using a single reference standard/working standard, rather than the equation of a calibration line.

 

The linearity of detector response to different concentrations of both active ingredients was studied by preparing a series of solutions using CLP and ASP standards. The data were subjected to statistical analysis using a linear-regression model. The results have indicated good linearity. Results are shown in Table No 3.

 

Table 3:  Results of Linearity Studies (Response Vs Concentration)

Name of Drug substances

Correlation coefficient

Slope

Intercept

Aspirin

0.999

21573

438.4

Clopidogrel

0.999

21830

4476.5

 

Precision:

Six sample solutions were prepared using single sample Lot of CLP and ASP tablets and the precision of the method was tested. The % relative standard deviation (RSD) indicates that proposed method has got an acceptable level of repeatability. Results indicate the proposed method has got a good precision. Results are tabulated in Table No 4.

 

Table 4: Precision data

Active Name

Mean % Assay

%RSD

Aspirin

101.4

0.2

Clopidogrel

100.8

0.2

N= six sample preparations

Accuracy:

Accuracy of the proposed method was established by recovery experiments. This study was employed by spiking of known amounts of active ingredients into the placebo samples of at 50%, 100% and 150% of targeted concentration, in triplicate and injected into the chromatographic system. The resulting mixtures were analyzed as described in proposed method. Results obtained from recovery studies are given in Table No 5.

 

Table 5: Results of Recovery Study at Different Levels

Name of Drug substances

 50% level

  100% level

150% level

Aspirin

100.5

100.5

100.3

Clopidogrel

100.5

100.2

100.5

Note: Number of samples analyzed at each level is in triplicate

 

Robustness:

The robustness of an analytical procedure is a measure of its capacity to remain unaffected by small, but deliberate, variations in method parameters, and provides an indication of its reliability during normal usage. In the present study, an experimental design was planned for robustness testing varying some conditions, e.g. flow rate, column temperature and variation of buffer pH in the mobile phase. It can be seen that, with every employed condition, there were no dramatic changes in the chromatographic behavior. All parameters have been observed within the limits required for system suitability tests. The results are shown in Table No 6.

Solution stability:

Solution Stability studies were performed for Standards and test spiked solution for about 24 hours at 5°C.Results from this study were compared against initial standard area and % Assay for test solution. Data indicates that both standard and test solutions  are stable at 5°C for about 24 hours with acceptance  criteria of  ± 2.0 for both test and standard solution.  Results obtained from solution stability studies are given in Table No 7.

 

CONCLUSION:

The validated stability-indicating HPLC method has proved to be simple, accurate, precise and reliable. The developed method reported herein was validated by evaluation of the validation parameters as described in ICH guidelines. System suitability, specificity, linearity, precision, accuracy and robustness of the proposed technique were obtained during the validation studies. The developed method is also stability-indicating and can be used for the routine analysis of combined tablet dosage form of Clopidogrel and Aspirin also check the purity and stability of the active substance in pharmaceutical dosage forms.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

The authors are thankful to Hetero Labs Ltd, Hyderabad for providing the necessary facilities to complete this research.

 

 


 

 

Table 6: Results of Robustness Study 

Parameter

Deliberate change

Theoretical plates

Tailing factor

Aspirin

Clopidogrel

Aspirin

Clopidogrel

Flow rate (1.0mL/min)

0.8mL/min

7523

45220

1.1

1.02

1.2mL/min

5503

27564

1.05

1.01

Temperature (35°C)

30°C

7502

43205

1.05

1.02

40°C

5003

28034

1.05

1.01

pH of buffer (2.3)

2.1

6552

40220

1.05

1.02

2.5

4856

28502

1.10

1.01

 

Table 7: Results of Solution Stability Studies

Name

Initial

After 24 Hours

Difference from the Initial

 Area of Standard for Aspirin

1088036

1100018

2.2%

Area of Standard for Clopidogrel

826193

825884

4.8%

% of Aspirin Assay in Test

101.5

101.5

0.0

% of Clopidogrel Assay in Test

100.7

101

0.3

 

 


References:

1.       Mrinalini CD, Purushotam KS, Kailash GB. A validated stability indicating  HPTLC method for determination of aspirin and clopidogrel bisulphate in combined dosage form. Eurasian journal of analytical chemistry, 2009: 4(2);152-160.

2.       Kaila HO, Ambasana MA, Shah AK. A simple and rapid Ultra-Performance liquid chromatographic assay method for the simultaneous determination of Aspirin, Clopidogrel bisulphate and Atorvastatin calcium in capsule dosage form. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res, 2011: 3 ;459-465.

3.       Mishra P, Archana D. Simultaneous determination of clopidogrel and aspirin in pharmaceutical dosage forms. Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences, 2006: 68(3); 365-368.

4.       Anandakumar K, et al. RP-HPLC analysis of aspirin and clopidogrel bisulphate in combination. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2007: 69(4); 597-599.

5.       Panda, Sagar, S. Ion-Pairing RP-HPLC Method for Simultaneous determination of aspirin and clopidogrel bisulphate in tablet and capsule dosage form. Int J Pharm Tech Res, 2010: 2 ; 269-273.

6.       Kachhadia PK, Ashish SD, Hitendra SJ. Validated Column High-Performance Liquid Chromatographic Method for Determination of Aspirin and Clopidogrel in Combined Tablets in the Presence of Degradation Products Formed Under ICH Recommended Stress Conditions. Journal of AOAC International. 2008: 92(1); 152-157.

7.       Gandhimathi M., Ravi TK. High performance liquid chromatographic determination of aspirin and clopidogrel in tabletsIndian journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2007: 69(1); 123-125

8.       Shrivastava PK, et al. Concurrent estimation of clopidogrel bisulfate and aspirin in tablets by validated RP-HPLC method. Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences.2008: 70(5); 667-669.

9.       Londhe SV, et al. Development and validation of a reversed-phase HPLC method for simultaneous determination of aspirin, atorvastatin calcium and clopidogrel bisulphate in capsules. Indian journal of pharmaceutical sciences. 2011: 73(1); 23-29.

10.    Singh S, Nitin D, Jain DK. Simultaneous estimation of atorvastatin, clopidogrel and aspirin in capsule dosage forms using UV-spectroscopy. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry.2010: 3(4); 885-887.

11.    Himani A., et al. Stability indicating HPTLC determination of clopidogrel bisulphate as bulk drug and in pharmaceutical dosage form. Talanta. 61; 2003: 581-589.

12.    Durga RD., et al. A validated stability-indicating normal phase LC method for clopidogrel bisulfate and its impurities in bulk drug and pharmaceutical dosage form. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2010: 52(1); 160-165.

13.    Mohan A., et al. Identification and characterization of a principal oxidation impurity in clopidogrel drug substance and drug product. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2008: 47(1) ; 183-189.

14.    Fayed AS., et al. Separation and determination of clopidogrel and its impurities by capillary electrophoresis. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis,  2009: 49(2);193-200.

15.    Londhe SV, et al. Simultaneous HPTLC analysis of aspirin, atorvastatin calcium and clopidogrel bisulphate in the bulk drug and in capsules. Acta Chromatographica,  2010: 22(2); 297-305.

16.    Kahsay G, AnnVan S, Erwin A. Development and validation of a liquid chromatographic method for purity control of clopidogrel–acetylsalicylic acid in combined oral dosage forms. Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis, 2012: 61; 271-276.

17.    Alarfaj NA, Stability-indicating liquid chromatography for determination of clopidogrel bisulfate in tablets: Application to content uniformity testing. Journal of Saudi Chemical Society, 2012: 16(1); 23-30.

18.    ICH. Q2R1, Validation of analytical procedures and methodology, In Proceeding of the International Conference on Harmonization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2005.