ISSN 0974-3618
(Print) www.rjptonline.org
0974-360X (Online)
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Comparative Study on Anti-inflammatory
and Analgesic Activities of Pure Aceclofenac with the Aceclofenac Loaded
Mucoadhesive Microparticles in Rats
Rajesh. M1, 2* and Narayanan. N3
1Sankaralingam Bhuvaneswari College of Pharmacy,
Anaikuttam, Sivakasi- 626130 Tamilnadu, India.
2Periyar Maniammai University, Vallam, Thanjavur-
613403 Tamil Nadu, India.
3Director,
Jaya College of Pharmacy, Thirunintravur, Chennai- 602024 Tamilnadu, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: mrajeshpharm@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Aceclofenac
is a non steroidal Anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) used for relief of pain and
inflammation in osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing
spondylitis. Aceclofenac possess remarkable Anti-inflammatory and analgesic
properties and the analgesic and Anti-inflammatory efficacy is generally
equivalent to that of comparator nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)
with similar onset of action. The objective of the present study was to
evaluate and compare the Anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect of Aceclofenac
loaded mucoadhesive microparticles developed
by employing sodium alginate in combination with Carbopol as mucoadhesive polymer (F8) with that of
pure Aceclofenac in wistar rats. The Anti-inflammatory and sustaining action of
the formulation F8 was evaluated by the carrageenan-induced hind paw edema
method and the analgesic activity was determined by tail flick method in wistar
rats. The results of Anti-inflammatory activity showed a maximum of 86.99%
inhibition of edema with Group III (Pure Aceclofenac) and 82.11% inhibition of
edema with Group V (F8) at 4 h after carrageenan treatment. In analgesic study,
Group II (pure Aceclofenac) had showed increase in Basal reaction time.
Moreover, it showed highly significance with p<0.01 and Group IV (F8) showed
significance at p< 0.05 compared to control group.
KEYWORDS: Aceclofenac, Anti-inflammatory activity,
Analgesic activity, Carbopol, Mucoadhesive microparticles.
INTRODUCTION:
The
treatment of inflammation and pain is an important area of clinical science. In
the last decade, non steroidal Anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have played a
central role in these indications and they are currently considered as the
first choice, being one of the most widely prescribed drugs1,2.
Aceclofenac is a non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory (NSAID) drug used extensively
in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and ankylosing
spondylitis. Aceclofenac is newer derivative of Diclofenac and having less GIT
complication, with short biological half-life of 4 hrs and dosing frequency
more than one time make it an ideal candidate for sustain release dosage form3.
Received on 27.12.2014 Modified on 11.01.2015
Accepted on 20.01.2015 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech.
8(2): Feb. 2015; Page 185-188
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00033.5
The
mode of action of Aceclofenac is largely based on the inhibition of
prostaglandin synthesis. Aceclofenac is a potent inhibitor of the enzyme
cyclooxygenase (Cox), which is involved in the production of prostaglandins4.
Aceclofenac loaded mucoadhesive
microparticles developed by employing sodium alginate in
combination with Carbopol as mucoadhesive
polymer has been formulated to reduce gastrointestinal tract irritation and to
release the drug for prolong period. The present study has been designed to
know whether the formulation shows better Anti-inflammatory and analgesic
activity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Materials
Aceclofenac
was obtained from Micro Labs, Hosur, India. Calcium chloride dihydrate was
procured from Leo Chem, Bangalore, India. Carbopol 934P was obtained from Loba
Chemie Pvt. Ltd, Mumbai, India. Sodium alginate was procured from Reachem
Laboratory Chemicals Pvt. Ltd, Chennai, India. Carrageenan was procured from
Spectrochem Pvt. Ltd. Mumbai, India. All other reagents used were of analytical
grade.
Methods
Preparation of mucoadhesive microparticles
of Aceclofenac by Orifice-Ionic Gelation Method
Sodium
alginate (1.0 g) and Carbopol (1.0 g) were dissolved in purified water (32 ml)
to form a homogeneous polymer solution. The active core material Aceclofenac
(1.0 g) was added to the polymer solution and mixed thoroughly with a stirrer to
form a smooth viscous dispersion. The resulting dispersion was then added
dropwise into calcium chloride (10%w/v) solution (40 ml) through a syringe with
a needle of size No: 18. The added droplets were retained in the calcium
chloride solution for 30 min to complete the curing reaction and to produce
spherical rigid microcapsules5. The microcapsules were collected by
decantation and the product thus separated was washed repeatedly with water and
dried at 45°C for 12 h.
Experimental Animals
Adult
wistar albino rats, weighing (180-220g) were used for the study. The animals
were fed with standard pellet diet and water ad libitum. They were housed in colony cages under standard
laboratory conditions (12:12h light and day cycle, temperature at 25±2°C and
relative humidity at 55±10%). Animals were allowed to acclimate for 7 days to
the laboratory conditions before the commencement of experiments. The ethical
clearance was obtained from Institutional Animal Ethical Committee (IAEC) of
Sankaralingam Bhuvaneswari College of Pharmacy for using animals in the present
study.
Experimental Design
The
pure drug (Aceclofenac), Marketed Aceclofenac S.R tablet, Aceclofenac loaded mucoadhesive microparticles were
suspended in 1% Carboxy methylcellulose (CMC).A required volume was
administered orally using oral cannula. Fasted rats that were deprived of food
but not water for 24 h prior to experiment were used to assess the effect of
pure Aceclofenac, Aceclofenac S.R tablet, Aceclofenac microparticles and CMC on
gastric mucosa.
In vivo Anti-inflammatory study 6-8
The
Anti-inflammatory and sustaining action of Aceclofenac microparticles was
evaluated by the carrageenan-induced hind paw edema method in Wistar rats. Adult male wistar rats, weighing 180-220 g,
were randomly divided into 5 groups each containing 6 rats. Group I as Normal
control, Group II as negative control, Group III received Pure Aceclofenac,
Group IV received marketed Aceclofenac S.R tablet and Group V received
Aceclofenac microparticles (F8). Doses for the rats were calculated based on
the mass of the animals (10mg/kg). The
suspension of drugs was given orally to Groups III, IV and V using oral
cannula. After 30 min of drug administration,
rats of all groups (except Group I) were challenged by subcutaneous injection
of 1% w/v solution of carrageenan into the plantar site of the hind paw. The paw volumes were measured with a
plethysmometer, prior to administration of carrageenan and after 1, 2, 3 and 4
hours of carrageenan administration. The increase in paw volume was calculated
as percentage compared with the basal volume. The percentage of inhibition was
calculated using the following formula:
% Inhibition = Vc – Vt/ Vc x 100
Where
Vc and Vt represent average paw volume of control and treated animals respectively.
In vivo Analgesic study7, 9
The
analgesic activity was determined by tail flick method using Analgesiometer.
Take basal reaction time to radiant heat by placing the tip (last 1.2 cm) of
the tail on the radiant heat source. The
tail withdrawal from the heat (Flicking response) is taken as the end point.
Normally a rat withdraws its tail within 3-5 sec. A cut off period of 10-12 sec is observed to
prevent damage to the tail. Any animal
failing to withdraw its tail in 3-5 sec is rejected from the study. Take at least 3-5 basal reaction times for
each rat at a gap of 5 minutes to confirm normal behaviour of the animal. The
animals were divided into 4 groups (n=6). Group I as Control, Group II received
Pure Aceclofenac, Group III received marketed Aceclofenac S.R tablet and Group
IV received Aceclofenac microparticles (F8). Doses for the rats were calculated
based on the mass of the animals (10mg/kg).
The suspension of drugs were given orally to each group except Group I
and the reaction time at 1,2,3,4 and 5h were noted and the tail flick latency
was measured after the drug administration. The data were then compared with
control group.
RESULTS AND
DISCUSSION:
Evaluation of
Anti-inflammatory Study
The
Aceclofenac loaded mucoadhesive
microparticles was prepared and subjected for in vivo anti inflammatory study by
carrageenan-induced paw edema method in rats. In order to have a better
comparison between the anti inflammatory activity of pure aceclofenac, marketed
Aceclofenac S.R Tablet and the Aceclofenac loaded mucoadhesive microparticles evaluation was made on the basis of
their ability to inhibit the edema produced in hind paw of rats after
challenging with the carrageenan. The results are shown in Table 1.
A
maximum of 86.99% inhibition of edema was observed with Pure Aceclofenac (Group
III) and maximum 82.36% and 82.11% inhibitions of edema was observed with
Marketed Aceclofenac S.R tablet (Group IV) and Aceclofenac microparticles F8
(Group V) respectively at 4 h after carrageenan treatment. Pure Aceclofenac
(Group-III) was found to be highly significant in reducing the paw edema
compared to marketed S.R tablet (Group-IV) and Aceclofenac microparticles F8
(Group-V). Marketed S.R tablet (Group-IV) and Aceclofenac microparticles F8
(Group-V) was found to be equally significant in reducing the paw edema.
Maximum
inhibition of edema was observed with Pure Aceclofenac (Group-III) compared
to marketed
Aceclofenac S.R tablet (Group IV) and Aceclofenac microparticles F8 (Group V).This
may be due to slower release of drug in gastrointestinal tract from the
mucoadhesive microparticles and marketed S.R tablet because of increased
viscosity contributed by swellable hydrophilic polymers.
Evaluation of
Analgesic study
The analgesic activity of pure Aceclofenac,
marketed Aceclofenac S.R tablet and the Aceclofenac loaded mucoadhesive
microparticles were evaluated based on its ability to inhibit the pain produced
after challenging with heat reactions.
Group I (Control) have no analgesic effects since
there is no significant difference in basal reaction time till 5th
hour. Group II (Pure
Aceclofenac) had showed increase in basal reaction time.
Moreover, it showed significant (p<0.01) analgesic activity when compared
with Group III (marketed Aceclofenac S.R tablet) and Group IV (mucoadhesive
microparticles F8). This may be due to rapid absorption of drug from the
suspension of pure drug; whereas the drug may be released slowly from the
marketed S.R tablet and mucoadhesive microparticles (F8).
Group III and Group IV had showed similar response
towards the basal reaction time. Both had showed significance at p< 0.05
compared to control group. The results are shown in Table 2.
Table 1- Anti-
Inflammatory effect of Aceclofenac formulations on carrageenan induced hind paw edema in rats
GROUP |
Mean increase in paw
volume(mL) |
|||
1st hour |
2nd hour |
3rd hour |
4th hour |
|
I (Normal control) |
0.080±0.020 |
0.181±0.004 |
0.160±0.004 |
0.14±0.004 |
II (Negative control) |
0.27±0.078### |
0.74±0.004### |
1.17±0.019### |
1.23±0.0232### |
III ( Pure Aceclofenac ) |
0.090±.001*** |
0.210±0.031*** |
0.19±0.004*** |
0.16±0.004*** |
IV ( Aceclofenac marketed S.R tablet) |
0.105±0.002** |
0.220±0.004** |
0.220±0.004** |
0.217±0.250** |
V( Aceclofenac microparticles
F8) |
0.14±0.006** |
0.270±0.009** |
0.267±0.004** |
0.220±0.004** |
The results are expressed as mean ± SEM, (n=6). The
data was analyzed by using One way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test.
###p<.0.001,
where Group I were compared with Group II. (Significant with Inflammation).
***p<.0.001, **p<0.01, where Group III, IV&
V were compared with Group II. (Significant with Anti-inflammatory activity)
Table 2-Analgesic activity of Aceclofenac formulations by tail flick method
Group |
Basal reaction time before
drug administration (sec) |
Basal reaction time after drug
administration (sec) |
||||
1 h |
2 h |
3 h |
4 h |
5 h |
||
I (Control) |
2.25±0.25 |
1.75±0.25 |
2.25±0.25 |
3.00±0408 |
3.25±0.25 |
3.50±0.28 |
II ( Pure Aceclofenac ) |
1.75±0.25 |
9.50±0.28** |
11.00±0.408** |
12.25±0.25** |
12.75±0.25** |
13.25±0.25** |
III ( Aceclofenac marketed S.R tablet) |
2.00±0.01 |
7.25±0.25* |
9.50±0.288* |
11.00±0.408* |
12.00±0.408* |
12.50±0.408* |
IV ( Aceclofenac
microparticles F8) |
1.50±0.28 |
6.00±0.408* |
8.25±0.25* |
9.50±0.28* |
10.75±0.478* |
11.50±0.288* |
The
results are expressed as mean ± SEM, (n=6). The data was analyzed by using One
way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s test. **p<0.01, *p<0.05, where Group II,
III & IV were compared with Group I.
CONCLUSION:
In
Anti-inflammatory study, Group-III (Pure Aceclofenac) was found to be highly
significant in reducing the paw edema compared to Group-IV (marketed S.R
tablet) and Group-V (Aceclofenac microparticles F8). Group-IV (Marketed S.R
tablet) and Group-V (Aceclofenac microparticles F8) were found to be equally
significant in reducing the paw edema. In Analgesic study Group
II (Pure Aceclofenac)
showed significant (p<0.01) analgesic activity when compared with Group III
(marketed Aceclofenac S.R tablet) and Group IV (mucoadhesive microparticles).
Group III and Group IV had showed similar response towards the basal reaction
time (p< 0.05) compared to control group.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
The authors are thankful to Mr. S. Sriram Ashok
B.E, Correspondent and Department of Pharmacology, Sankaralingam Bhuvaneswari
College of Pharmacy, Anaikuttam, Sivakasi for providing necessary facilities to
carry out the work.
REFERENCES:
1. Peloso PM. Strategies and practice for use of
nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory drugs. Scand
J Rheumatol.1 (105); 1996: 29-43.
2. Simon LS. Actions and toxicity of nonsteroidal
Anti-inflammatory drugs .Curr Opin
Rheumatol.7; 1995: 159-166.
3. Trivedi P, Verma AML and Garud N. Preparation and
characterization of aceclofenac microspheres. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2 (2); 2008: 110-115.
4. FitzGerald GA, Patrono C. The coxibs,
selective inhibitors of cyclooxygenase-2. N
Engl J Med. 345(6); 2001:433-42.
5. Rajesh. M, Narayanan.N and Asha Chacko. Formulation and evaluation of mucoadhesive
microcapsules of Aceclofenac using methyl Cellulose and carbopol as
mucoadhesive polymers. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 4(4); 2012: 362-366.
6. Mutalik
S, Naha A, Usha AN, Anju P, Ranjith AK, Musmade P and Manoj K Prasanna.
Preparation, in vitro, preclinical
and clinical evaluation of once daily sustained release tablets of aceclofenac.
Arch Pharm Res. 30; 2007: 222-234.
7. Kulkarni SK. Hand Book of Experimental Pharmacology.2nd
Edition. 1993:49, 53.
8. Mithun
Dey, Saumen Karan1, Biswanath SA and Tapan Kumar Chatterjee. Comparative study on Ulcerogenicity and
Anti-inflammatory activities of pure Aceclofenac with the Aceclofenac loaded
Interpenetrating Polymer Network (IPN) Beads in Rats. Int J Pharm
Chem Sci.1 (2); 2012: 819-827.
9. Amberkar Mohanbabu Vittalrao, Tara
Shanbhag, Meena Kumari.K, Bairy KL and Smita Shenoy.Evaluation of
Anti-inflammatory and Analgesic activities of Alcoholic extract of Kaempferia Galanga in rats. Indian J Pharmacol. 55 (1); 2011:13-24.