Cytomorphometric and Nucleomorphometeric analysis in Patients with Malignant Lesion, Patients with associated habits but with apparently Normal Mucosa and Control Group.
Harsha. L1*, Dr. Gheena. S2, Khushali. K. Shah1
12nd BDS, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai-600 077.
2Reader, Department of Oral Pathology, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Chennai-600 077.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: slashhania@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Aim: The aim of the study is to evaluate the dysplastic changes, changes in the cell and nuclear morphology and diameter in Buccal smears of patients in study groups. Background: Oral exfoliative cytology is a simple and relatively pain free procedure.Oral exfoliative cytological technique has been used for the detection of oral premalignant malignant lesions. In exfoliative cytology various parameters such as nuclear size, cell and nuclear pleomorphism, nuclear membrane discontinuity, degenerative changes of nucleus and nuclear cytoplasmic ratio can be analysed. Materials and method: Smears were taken from the buccal mucosa of 10 patients with malignant lesion, 10 patients with associated habits but apparently normal mucosa and 10 healthy individuals (control group). All the smears were stained and evaluated using research microscope and image analysis software. Reason: To explore the potential of Exfoliative cytology as a diagnostic adjunct in patients with malignant disorders and in patients with associated habits but apparently normal mucosa.
KEYWORDS
INTRODUCTION:
Oral cancer is currently recognized as the most common malignancy in the world(1). The common etiological factor that accounts for these malignancies are adverse associated habits, such as smoking, alcoholism, etc(2). This results in histological changes in the buccal mucosa which is a predisposing factor for the development of these lesions (3). The rapid turnover of cells play a valuable role in the diagnosis of these malignancies (4). Early diagnosis and prompt treatment offers best hope in improving the prognosis in patients(5).
Exfoliative cytology is a simple, non invasive diagnostic technique, that increases the chance of earlier detection of dysplastic changes in the cells(6). With advancements in the field of quantitative oral exfoliative cytology, this technique has gained importance in the diagnosis of malignancies.
Parameters such as nuclear size, cell size, nuclear cytoplasmic ratio, presence of micronuclei, nuclear shape, nuclear discontinuity, optical density and nuclear texture can be evaluated to establish the appropriate diagnosis of malignancy(7) The present study aims at analyzing the cytomorphometric and nucleomorphometric changes in the cells of the buccal mucosa obtained via exfoliative cytological technique in patients with malignant lesions and in patients with associated habits.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
The study group consisted of 15 patients, 5 patients with malignant disorders, 5 patients with associated habits but with apparently normal mucosa and 5 control group.
Subjects of both the study and the control groups were informed of the procedure and a written informed consent was obtained.
Patients with malignant lesion:
Inclusion criteria:
Patients aged 45 years and above.
Patients with a malignant lesion in the oral cavity.
Patients undergoing radiation and chemotheraphy.
Patients diagnosed with cancer.
Patients with associated habits but apparently normal mucosa:
Inclusion criteria:
Patients aged 45 years and above
Patients who smoked at least 10 cigarettes a day for last 10 years, with apparently normal mucosa.
Patients who have regular drinking habits for the past 10 years, with apparently normal mucosa.
Exclusion criteria:
Patients who suffered from systemic diseases like anemia, diabetes, etc.
Patients who have undergone radiation therapy or chemo therapy.
Patients with malignant or pre malignant oral lesions, such as leukoplakia or erythroplakia.
Patients diagnosed with cancer.
Control group:
Patients aged 45 years and above.
Patients with clinically healthy mucosa.
Patients who were non-smokers and non-alcoholics.
Patients who do not have any systemic complications.
Patients who did not have oral lesions.
Patients with poor oral hygiene were excluded.
Method for collection of data:
Smears were collected from patients of the specific group using a wooden spatula moistened in distilled water. Three smears were obtained from the buccal mucosa of each patient included in the study. The scrapings were transferred onto a clean glass slide, to produce a thin and uniform smear. The prepared slides were fixed in 95% propanol.
Staining: two slides were stained using hematoxylin and eosin and the other one with papanicolaou stain.
The stained slides were then visualized under the microscope to study the cytomorphometrics and nucleomorphometrics of the cells- cytoplasmic area, nuclear area and nuclear cytoplasmic ratio.
The unfolded cells in a field were taken as representative of the entire cytological picture and evaluated. The entire slide was screened in a reister pattern for the existence of micronuclei.
RESULTS:
The present study includes 5 samples obtained from each group.
Table 1: presents the nuclear and cytoplasmic area of all the samples obtained.
NORMAL |
|
|
S.NO |
NUCLEAR AREA(µm2) |
CELL AREA(µm2) |
N1 |
134 |
3859 |
N2 |
104 |
2998 |
N3 |
127 |
3412 |
N4 |
146 |
4237 |
N5 |
105 |
2977 |
MALIGNANT LESION |
||
S.NO |
NUCLEAR AREA(µm2) |
CELL AREA (µm2) |
T1 |
102 |
2098 |
T2 |
98 |
1890 |
T3 |
134 |
3046 |
T4 |
146 |
4126 |
T5 |
134 |
3198 |
ADVERSE ORAL HABITS |
||
S.NO |
NUCLEAR AREA(µm2) |
CELL AREA (µm2) |
A1 |
144 |
4177 |
A2 |
139 |
4133 |
A3 |
140 |
4100 |
A4 |
137 |
3089 |
A5 |
132 |
3045 |
Table 2 presents the scoring as to the number of keratinized cells, number of non keratinized cells, micronuclei and the number of cells still undergoing keratinization.
MALIGNANCT LESION |
Number of keratinized cells |
Number of non keratinized cells |
micronuclei |
Number of cells undergoing keratinisation |
T1 |
0 |
0 |
+++ |
20 |
T2 |
0 |
8 |
++ |
12 |
T3 |
10 |
0 |
+ |
10 |
T4 |
0 |
5 |
+ |
15 |
T5 |
3 |
3 |
++ |
14 |
ADVERSE ORAL HABITS |
Number of keratinized cells |
Number of non keratinized cells |
micronuclei |
Number of cells undergoing keratinisation |
A1 |
0 |
0 |
+++ |
20 |
A2 |
4 |
7 |
+++ |
9 |
A3 |
0 |
8 |
+ |
12 |
A4 |
0 |
5 |
+ |
15 |
A5 |
0 |
5 |
++ |
15 |
NORMAL |
Number of keratinized cells |
Number of non keratinized cells |
micronuclei |
Number of cells undergoing keratinisation |
N1 |
0 |
0 |
Nil |
20 |
N2 |
0 |
5 |
Nil |
15 |
N3 |
2 |
3 |
Nil |
15 |
N4 |
0 |
5 |
Nil |
15 |
N5 |
0 |
2 |
+ |
18 |
Table 3: Presents the comparison of the cellular and nuclear area of normal to malignant lesions
|
SAMPLE |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
‘t’ |
Sig |
Nuclear area |
Normal |
5 |
123.2000 |
18.37662 |
8.21827 |
.032 |
.976 |
|
PMOD |
5 |
122.8000 |
21.42895 |
9.58332 |
|
|
Cell area |
Normal |
5 |
3496.6000 |
548.92377 |
245.48617 |
1.321 |
.223 |
|
PMOD |
5 |
2871.6000 |
904.49809 |
404.50384 |
|
|
RATIO |
Normal |
5 |
28.3729 |
.87714 |
.39227 |
3.392 |
.009 |
|
PMOD |
5 |
22.9423 |
3.47070 |
1.55214 |
|
|
Table 4: Presents the comparison of the cellular and nuclear area of normal to adverse oral habits.
|
SAMPLE |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
‘t’ |
Sig |
Nuclear area |
Normal |
5 |
123.2000 |
18.37662 |
8.21827 |
1.799 |
.110 |
|
Adverse oral habits |
5 |
138.4000 |
4.39318 |
1.96469 |
|
|
Cell area |
Normal |
5 |
3496.6000 |
548.92377 |
245.48617 |
.591 |
.571 |
|
Adverse oral habits |
5 |
3708.8000 |
586.72327 |
262.39062 |
|
|
RATIO |
Normal |
5 |
28.3729 |
.87714 |
.39227 |
.994 |
.349 |
|
Adverse oral habits |
5 |
26.7284 |
3.59311 |
1.60689 |
|
|
Table 5: presents the comparison of nuclear and cellular area of malignant lesion to adverse oral habits.
|
SAMPLE |
N |
Mean |
Std. Deviation |
Std. Error Mean |
‘t’ |
Sig |
Nuclear area |
Adverse oral habits |
5 |
138.4000 |
4.39318 |
1.96469 |
.822 |
.149 |
|
PMOD |
5 |
122.8000 |
21.42895 |
9.58332 |
|
|
Cell area |
Adverse oral habits |
5 |
3708.8000 |
586.72327 |
262.39062 |
.819 |
.121 |
|
PMOD |
5 |
2871.6000 |
904.49809 |
404.50384 |
|
|
RATIO |
Adverse oral habits |
5 |
26.7284 |
3.59311 |
1.60689 |
.393 |
.129 |
|
PMOD |
5 |
22.9423 |
3.47070 |
1.55214 |
|
|
Table 6: Presents the multiple comparison of the number of non keratinized cells among the three groups
Kruskal-Wallis Test
Table 7: Presents the micronuclei group cross tabulation of the three groups
Figure 1: Presents the number of non keratinized cells of the three groups
Figure 2: Presents the number of micronuclei of the three groups
Comparison of the nuclear to the cytoplasmic area of the cells obtained from the three groups was done using T test. Comparison of the number of non keratinized cells among the three groups was done using Tukey HST and Kruskal-Wallis Test. Micronuclei cross tabulation was done to obtain the percentage distribution of micronuclei among the three groups.
DISCUSSION:
The ratio of the nuclear to cellular area of cells, in patients with malignant lesions shows a significant change to that of normal. This indicates that there a varying changes in the nuclear and the cytolplasmic volume of the mucosal cells present in patients with malignant oral lesions. In a study conducted by Shabana et al, a steady increase in the nuclear and the cytoplasmic area was indicated, which is in accordance to the present study(8).
The ratio of the nuclear to cytoplasmic area of cells in patients with adverse oral habits to that of normal do not show any significant change. This indicates that there isn't a varied difference in the nuclear and the cytoplasmic volume seen in the mucosal cells of patients with adverse oral habits.
On comparing the ratio of the nuclear to cellular volume of cells in patients with malignant lesion and adverse oral habits, there is no significant variation observed.
Based on the statistical data obtained, the P value of the three groups are not significant. Kruskal wallis test gives a p value of 0.447, which is not significant. Though the number of non keratinized cells vary, statistical variation was not obtained.
On comparing the number of non keratinized cells observed in smears obtained from patients with malignant lesion to normal smears, no significant variation was observed. Similar results were obtained on comparison of cells seen in normal smears to those obtained from patients with adverse oral habits.
On comparing the three groups, it is observed that, patients with adverse oral habits possessed the maximum number of non keratinized cells, followed by patients with malignant lesions and then by patients with normal mucosa.
The percentage distribution of micronuclei indicated, absence in the mucosal cells of patients with normal mucosa. Mucosal cells of patients with adverse oral habits, posses maximum micronuclei of about 40%. Fewer micronuclei were observed in the mucosal cells of patients with malignant lesions.
CONCLUSION:
In accordance to studies conducted earlier, significant results weren't obtained in the present study. This could be due to reduced sample size. Hence the present study is to be continued with a larger sample size in order to obtain clear cut results, thus highlighting the dysplastic changes of the cells observed in different groups.
REFERENCES:
1. Ravi Mehrotra, Anurag Gupta, Mamta Singh and Rahela Ibrahim. Application of cytology and molecular biology in diagnosing premalignant or malignant oral lesions. molecular cancer 2006,5 : 11.
2. 2.Maryam Alsadat Hashemipour, Mahbobeh Aghababaie, Toraj Reza Mirshekari, Majid Asadi Shekaari, Mehrnaz Tahmasbi Arashlow, Farzad Tahmsbi Arashlow, Sayed Amir Hossein Gandjalikhan Nassab. Exfoliative cytology of oral mucosa among smokers, opium addicts, and non-smokers: A Cytomorphometric study. Archives of iranian medicine, vol 16, number 12, december 2013, pages 725-730.
3. Ramaesh T, Mendis BRRN, Ratnatunga N, Thattil RO: The effect of tobacco amoking and of betel chewing with tobacco on the buccal mucosa: a cytomorphometric analysis. J Oral Pathol Med 1999; 28: 385-8.
4. Gayathri Devi Kumaresan, Nithya J agannathan, Exfoliative cytology-A predictive diagnostic tool. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci, vol 6, issue 5, 1-3.
5. T. Ramaesh, B.R.R.N. Mendis, N. Ratnatunga, R.O. Thattil. Diagnosis of oral premalignant and malignant lesions using cytomorphometry.odonto-stomatological tropicale 1999.
6. Alka Harish Hande, Minal S. Chaudhary. Cytomorphometric analysis of buccal mucosa of tobacco chewers. Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology 2010,51(3):527-532.
7. Ramaesh T, Mendis BRRN, Ratnatunga N, Thattil RO. Cytomorphometric analysis of squames obtained from normal oral mucosa and lesion of oral leukoplakia and squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Pathol Med 1998; 27:83-6.
8. A.H.M Shabana, N G El-Labban, K.W Lee. Morphometric analysis of basal cell layer in oral premalignant white lesions and squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Pathol 1987; 40:454-458.
Received on 03.07.2016 Modified on 20.07.2016
Accepted on 27.07.2016 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2016; 9(10):1699-1703.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00342.5