Awareness of Root Canal
Treatment among People
Pooja Umaiyal. M
BDS1st Year, Saveetha
Dental College, Chennai 600077.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: poojaumaiyal1998@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
AIM: The aim of this survey was to know the patient's expectation and their
view about root canal.
OBJECTIVE: This survey is conducted through a standardized
questionnaire distributed to the patients visiting Saveetha
dental college.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a questionnaire based survey that was conducted among patients
visiting saveetha dental college. A sample of 100 was
used and with the collected data, a statistical analysis was done.
BACKGROUND: Root canal treatment is the one in which
the inflamed or infected pulp is removed and the inside of the tooth is
carefully cleaned and disinfected, then filled and sealed with a rubber-like
material called gutta-percha. Afterwards, the tooth is restored with a crown or
filling for protection of the teeth.
REASON: This survey helps us to save the tooth by doing root canal treatment
instead of getting it extracted in the benefit of patients.
KEYWORDS: Endodontics, awareness, rubber dam, endodontic files, cavit, restoration.
INTRODUCTION:
In Root canal treatment (RCT), a damaged and diseased
dental pulp is removed and replaced by a sterile and antibacterial material. It
succours an individual to retain his tooth by
improving the overall function and aesthetics by repairing the focus of
infection and by treating the infected area. The patients are concerned of several issues
related to root canal treatment (RCT), including pain associated with root
canal treatment has been spread among patients, due to which they cancel the
visits to the dental clinic [2]. This leads to the worsening of their
situations. Contemporary endodontics has been
developing as the generation moves on. This development doesn't concern only
the instruments but also the procedure of the treatment. The modern endodontics concentrates more in making the procedure
painless and effective. There are multitudinous ways to mitigate the pain
suffered by the patients during the course of treatment by the usage of local
and conduction or even general anaesthesia [2].
The aim of this survey is to assess the patient's
opinion, experience and their knowledge of root canal treatment. This is done
to guide the patients to take a proper decision over their choice of treatment
and to bring about an awareness among people about root canal treatment.
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Questionnaire based survey was conducted among
patients visiting saveetha dental college. A total of 100 patients participated in the
study. There were two inclusive criterion for the study which was
followed- the patients should have
undergone the root canal treatment or he should be in the process. This
questionnaire contained a total of 10 questions that recorded the knowledge,
attitude and awareness of the patients towards root canal therapy.
RESULTS:
The study comprised of 100 subjects and the denouement
was calculated in percentages. The most probable reason for the dental visit by
the patient was due to toothache (26%), the second common reason was infection
caused in the tooth (20%) and the other reasons are sensitivity (17%), dental
caries (14%), injury (3%), tooth discoloration (8%) and it also composed of
people who visited for a general treatment and later got to know that there was
a need for RCT. Ample number of patients (71%) are aware of RCT, but a few
(29%) are not aware of what RCT is. 97% of the subject, preferred saving of
tooth over extraction. More than half the patients (95%) agree with the
doctor's suggestion for undergoing RCT, whereas 4% prefers extraction and the
rest prefer none. A considerable number of patients (86%) are aware of the
expenses related to the therapy and the number of follow ups required to
complete the treatment (95%). A total of 92% of the subject are ready for the
post endodontic restoration. As known, the procedures of RCT is painful 46% of
them accepted it to be too painful whereas the other 54% could bare the pain. It was recorded that 76%
of the subject could cope with the treatment and 71% of them were satisfied
enough to recommend the therapy to others.
Table no.1.1: various
reasons for dental visit
REASONS
FOR DENTAL VISIT |
|
Infection |
20% |
Sensitivity |
17% |
Dental caries |
14% |
Injury |
3% |
Tooth discolouration |
8% |
General |
13% |
Fig no.1.1: various
reasons for dental visit vs the no. of patients
Table
no.1.2: The yes percentage for various criteria
YES PERCENTAGE |
% |
Awareness of RCT |
71% |
Saving of tooth |
96% |
Awareness of expenses |
86% |
Proper follow ups |
95% |
Painful procedure |
46% |
Recommendation |
71% |
Fig no.1.2: The yes
percentage for various criteria vs no.of patients
Fig no.1.3: Awareness of RCT among people
DISCUSSION:
One of the fastest growing areas of dentistry in the
recent years is observed to be endodontics. The
quality and durability of the treatment has become more effective after the use
of Modern tools (the rotary nickel-titanium files which has enabled a quicker
root canal preparation, as these instruments produce a uniformly tapered canal
configuration with minimum canal transportation and also reduces the incidences
of periradicular irritation and post-operative
discomfort but only about one fifth of respondents use these rotary instruments
in root canal preparation whereas the others use Non-rotary manual endodontic
files), rubber dam, and microscope in daily practise.
Pain affiliated with the endodontic treatment is always perceived to be
moderate and rarely sharp [2].
The feeling of this emotion can be controlled or
reduced by the use many forms of local anesthesia and the use of nitrous oxide
enhances the effects of their actions. The primary purpose of the rubber dam
protection is to reduce the risk of foreign body inhalation or ingestion by the
patient and also to provide an aseptic environment for endodontic procedures.
Root canal treatment without a rubber dam can be hazardous and is legally
indefensible. According to various study, 79% of dentists never used rubber dam
and only 12.7% used it occasionally in the practice [1].
One of the most crucial step in endodontics
is the determination of the working length because the procedure includes
cleaning, shaping and obturation of the root canal
system. Improper or failure of the determination of the working time can lead
to apical perforation; overextension of irritants or obturation
materials into the peri-radicular tissues, may also
lead to incomplete instrumentation and obturation [1].
Temporary restorative materials used in endodontics must provide a high quality seal of the access
preparation to prevent microbial contamination of the root canal. Twenty-seven
percent of the respondents use Cavit as temporary
filling material, which under experimental conditions provided superior
resistance to bacterial leakage (Beach et al, 1996). Systemic antibiotics are
indicated only if there has been systemic spread of infection. Otherwise, they
may present more of a risk to the patient than the local infection. There is
evidence that antibiotics are prescribed inappropriately in general dental
practices (Palmer et al, 2000). Recent reviews revealed that systematic
antibiotics alone offer no additional benefit in the management of acute apical
periodontitis and acute abscesses in permanent
dentition (Mathews et al, 2003). With the increasing worldwide problem of
antimicrobial resistance, there is a need to rationalise
prescription of antibiotics [1].
The subjects visited the dentist only at the time of
problems. The major problem for their dental visit was toothache (26%). Only
54% of the people who were involved in the study could bare the pain that they
had to undergo during the procedures. Most of the people are not aware of the
term "endodontist" and they think that the
term "dentist/ dental surgeon" itself is a specialized field in which
the clinicians can carry out all the dental procedures.
The awareness about root canal treatment among
patients have been increased significantly over a period of time. This
awareness has been caused mainly due to mass media like television, Internet
and newspapers [2]. With reference to the survey it is clearly observed that
majority of the clinicians do not practice single visit root canal therapy. The
practice of multiple visit RCT results in lack of adequate clinical time to
complete the treatment in a single visit or the cause might be that the
clinician wants to wait till the pain and other symptoms completely subsides
before proceeding with obturation of the canal
system. At times patients prefer extraction over root canal therapy due to the
cost factor. Costs related to RCT are still debatable as patients often stress
that they are high of cost. Nevertheless, more than half of the respondents are
willing to pay the required amount just
so that they can avoid tooth loss. The study result indicates the increased
awareness among people about root canal treatment. In case of toothache, for
which people visited dentists, extraction was the other choice of treatment for
root canal therapy.
CONCLUSION:
An increased awareness about root canal therapy among
people has been observed. This survey shows that the clinicians even now use
multiple visit procedure for the completion of the treatment. Patients visit the clinic only at the time
of problem, mainly due to toothache. Clinical visit on a regular basis will
reduce the possibilities of severe infection or problems.
REFERENCES:
1.
N. Mehata, D. Raisingani, S.Gupta, M. Sharma. Endodontic Trends: Where We Are And
Where We Should Be-A Survey Report. People’s Journal of Scientific Research.
July 2013.Vol.6 (2) : 30-37
2.
Magdalena
Janczarek, Maria cieszko-Buk,
Teresa Bachanek, renaTa chałas Survey-based research on patients’ knowledge
about endodontic treatment. Pol J Public Health 2014;
124 (3): 134-137.
3.
Neha Sisodia, Sharda Yadav,Tanu Nangia , Preetinder Singh, Manisha Yadav, HP Singh. Dental Patients’ Knowledge and Attitude
towards Endodontics– A Survey. Journey of Pharmaceutical
and Biomedical Science 2015; 05 (01): 80-83
Received on 30.03.2016
Modified on 22.04.2016
Accepted on 02.05.2016 ©
RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2016;
9(7):779-781.
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2016.00149.9