Comparative Evaluation of Stability and Anti Bacterial Activity of various concentrations of triple antibiotic paste against Streptococcus salivarius – An in-vitro study

 

Divya. S1, Sujatha. S2

1MDS, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha University, India

2Reader, Department of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha University, India.

*Corresponding Author E-mail:

 

ABSTRACT:

Triple antibiotic paste is used as intracanal medicament to completely eliminate the microrganisms from the root canals. The Aim of this study is to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of various concentrations of triple antibiotic paste against Streptococcus salivarius by antimicrobial susceptibility testing. The stability and antimicrobial effect of triple antibiotic paste were tested by antibiotic susceptibility testing against Streptococcus salivarius by using Agar disc diffusion method over the period of one day, 3 days and 7 days. The samples were divided into three groups: Group 1, 1% TAP; Group 2, 2% TAP; Group 3, 3%; Group 4, Chlorhexidine (control). The zone of inhibition was measured after 24 hours and recorded in millimeters and the same procedure was repeated after 3 days and 7 days. Higher concentration of triple antibiotic paste (3%) showed superior antibacterial effect compared to 1%, 2% TAP and chlorhexidine. The antibacterial efficacy increased more rapidly after 7 days compared to 24 hours and 3 days. Under the impediment of this in vitro study, higher concentrations of triple antibiotic paste when used for a period of time showed an effective antibacterial effect.

 

KEYWORDS: Antibacterial agents, Antibiotics, Streptococcus salivarius.

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

The primary teeth are necessary to preserve the integrity of the dental arch.(1) Periradicular lesions in the primary teeth are of major concern in primary teeth because it causes spread of infection to the developing permanent teeth. Preserving the primary dentition is essential for physiological and social development of the children.(2) Therefore appropriate treatment is to be provided to completely eliminate the oral flora from the root canals by bio-disinfection which promotes enhanced healing and prevents reinfection. Pulp canal infections are polymicrobial in nature with majority of facultative anaerobes and aerobes.

 

 

Streptococcus salivarius is the principal commensal seen in oral cavity. It is a gram positive facultative anaerobic cocci. The presence of murein layer makes it a resistant organism to survive even in less osmotic conditions.(3) Some authors have studied the prevalence of microorganisms and reported that Streptococcus salivarius were seen dominating in primary teeth with necrotic pulp and periapical lesions.(4,5) The predominance of Streptococcus salivarius were seen inperiapical abscess in children.(6) It is difficult to eliminate these bacteria from contaminated root canals. Streptococcus salivarius were found regularly in primary culture of the samples contaminated with saliva. (7) Over many years various materials have been used as a intracanal medicament in primary teeth like formocresol, glutaraldehyde, calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine gel, corticosteroids and some antibiotics. Calcium hydroxide is the most commonly used intracanal medicament in endodontic treatment. Due to the alkaline nature of calcium hydroxide it does not eliminate certain facultative anaerobes like Streptococcus salivarius, E. faecalis etc. In the view of finding newer approaches for treatment of periradicular lesion, lesion sterilization and tissue repair (LSTR) technique was introduced in 1996 to disinfect pulpal, and periapical lesions.(8) This technique used a combination of antibiotics like ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and doxycycline were used to remove the harboured microbes in root canal dentine.(9) It is important to have the appropriate knowledge of the antimicrobial sensivitivity testing of various endodontic pathogens to use the necessary medicaments under resistant root canal infections.(10) There is a lacuna of evidence available in the literature evaluating the antimicrobial effectiveness of TAP against Streptoccus salivarius. This study aims in determining the stability of TAP over a period of time by evaluating the antibacterial effect of various concentrations of Streptococcus salivarius by antimicrobial susceptibility testing.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

The study approval was obtained from the institutional review board, Saveetha Dental College. (TAP) Triple antibiotic paste made of metronidazole, ciprofloxacin, doxycycline (1:1:1) were prepared by using sterile mortar and pestle with different concentrations of triple antibiotic paste using propylene glycol as a carrier in the ratio of 1:1 and stored under sterile conditions. The antimicrobial effect of triple antibiotic paste was tested by antimicrobial susceptibility testing against Streptococcus salivarius by using Agar disc diffusion method over the period of one day and after 3 days. The samples were divided into three groups: Group 1, 1% TAP; Group 2, 2% TAP; Group 3, 3%; Group 4, Chlorhexidine (control). Mueller- Hinton agar plates were used and inoculated with Streptococcus salivarius and sterile discs with different concentrations of Triple antibiotic paste were placed over it and incubated for 24 hours at 37 °C for 24 hours.(11) The zone of inhibition was measured after 24 hours and recorded in millimeters and the same procedure was repeated after 3 days, 7days, 14 days and 21 days. The results were analyzed statistically by the Kruskal-Wallis test at 5% significance level.

 

RESULTS:

The inhibitory zones at various concentrations of triple antibiotic paste and chlorhexidine against streptococcus salivarius are shown in (ig 1 and Table 1). From the disc diffusion method, it was observed that the zone of inhibition for (Group 1; 1% TAP) was 26mm 25mm, 26mm, 29mm and 32mm at 24h, 3 days,7 days, 14 days and 21 days (Group 2; 2% TAP) was 28mm, 26mm, 27mm, 31mm and 33mm (Group 3; 3% TAP) was 31mm 31mm, 37mm, 39mm and 41mm at 24h, after 3 days,7 days,14 days and 21 days respectively. (Group 4; Chlorhexidine) showed a zone of inhibition of 27mm, 23mm, 21mm, 18mm and16mm at 24h, after 3 days,7 days,14 days and 21 days respectively. The greater antimicrobial effect of TAP was seen for higher concentration and consequently increased over the period of 21 days (Figure-1 and Table- 1). The antimicrobial effect of triple antibiotic paste increased after 3, 7 14 and 21days. But chlorhexidine showed a lesser zone of inhibition after 14 and 21 days compared to 24 hours of incubation against Streptococcus salivarius.

 

 

Figure 1: Zone of Bacterial inhibition against Streptococcus salivarius

 


 

 

 

Table 1: Comparison of Zone of Inhibition of 1%, 2%, 3% Triple antibiotic paste and Chlorhexidine against Streptococcus salivarius

Sample

Zone of inhibition

Streptococcus salivarius

 

1% Triple Antibiotic Paste

2% Triple Antibiotic Paste

3% Triple Antibiotic Paste

Chlorhexidine

24 hours                         3 days                          7 days                         14 days                      21 days

26mm                             25mm                           26mm                         29mm                        32mm

28mm                             26mm                           27mm                         31mm                        33mm

31mm                             31mm                           37mm                         39mm                        41mm

27mm                             23mm                           21mm                         18mm                        16mm

 


 

 

 

 

DISCUSSION:

The ulmitate goal of pulp therapy is to restore the teeth in its ideal functional position to maintain the integrity of the dental arches. The intracanal medicament placement may help to reduce the microbes harbouring the root canal in between appointments.(12) The Antibiotics are used in treating many infectious diseases. Many bacteria in the root canal develop resistance to certain antibiotics due to constant use of antibiotics for treatment of wide range of infections limiting its antibacterial effect.(13) The systemic delivery of antibiotics is difficult reaching the root canals of non vital teeth, since there is no blood supply which is required for adequate absorption and distribution of the medicament. Topical application of antibiotics allows for better absorption and provides effective sterilization. (13) Intracanal application of antibiotics can destroy the pathogens during endodontic therapy.(14) William Windley et al., 2005 observed that the antimicrobial effect was less post-irrigation and the microbes decreased after placement of triple antibiotic paste for a period of 2 weeks.(15)

 

Triple antibiotic paste consists of mixture of two antibiotics and one corticosteroid. Metronidazole, ciprofloxacin and tetracycline combinations were used for the past few years. Mechanism of action of tetracycline is that it inhibits collagenase and matrix metalloproteinase thereby producing anti-inflammatory effect.(15) But, the use of tetracycline like minocycline has shown to cause crown discoloration.(16) So in this present study doxycycline was used.

 

Studies have shown that TAP provides effective disinfection of the root canals after 24 to 48 hour application.(17,18) There are various methods available in the literature for evaluating the anti-bacterial effect. Disc diffusion method was used in this study due to its simplicity and rapid detection of antimicrobial property and its ability to penetrate deep into the plasma membrane of the bacteria which proves its superior antibacterial effect. But it does not test the toxicity against specific microorganisms.(19) Most commonly used intracanal medicament used is calcium hydroxide. Calcium hydroxide has been widely used as an intracanal medicament. Several studies have reported that due to alkaline ph of calcium hydroxide there is difficulty in eliminating resistant microrganisms.(20) In this study, chlorhexidine has been used as a control as it possess various properties like superior antimicrobial activity, substantivity, lower cytotoxicity and its clinical effectiveness compared to other medicaments as it has the capacity to inhibit matrix metalloproteinase.(21) It removes the smear layer produced during mechanical instrumentation.(22,23) Chlorhexidine has better antibacterial property compared to Ca(OH) against resistant bacteria present in the root canal. TAP showed a favourable healing and repair of periradicular tissue when used as an intracanal medicament in non surgical endodontic therapy.(24)

 

Streptococcus salivarius was used as a test organism in the present study. It has been observed by J.P Burton et al., 2005 that Streptococcus salivarius was detected in the human saliva.(25) In this study 1, 2 and 3% TAP was used because it has been reported that higher concentration of TAP may cause adverse effects on the stem cells of dental papilla.(26) Under the limitations of this in vitro study, higher concentrations of triple antibiotic paste can effectively eliminate Streptococcus salivarius from the root canals compared to chlorhexidine. The antibacterial effect of intracanal medicaments increased after 21days, thus confirming its stability and antibacterial efficacy.

 

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES FOR RESEARCH:

In future more in vivo studies are advocated to determine the stability and antibacterial effect of TAP under proper oral conditions against Streptococcus salivarius for a longer period of time to confirm the findings obtained from this study.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

Authors would like to thank Department of Microbiology for their guidance and support.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

Nil.

 

REFERENCES:

1.       Cox ST, Hembre, J.H., McKnight JP. The bactericidal potential of various endodontic materials for primary teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1978; 45: 947–54.

2.       Mandel ID. Oral infections: Impact on human health, well-being, and health-care costs. Compend ContinEduc Dent 2004; 25: 881–890.

3.       Schaechter M, Ingraham LJ, Neidhardt CF. Microbe.ASM Press, 2006. P.23-25

4.       Cohen MM, Joress SM, Calisti LP, Mass B. Bacteriologic study of infected deciduous molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1960;3:1382-1386.

5.       Tomic-Karovic K, Jelinek E. Comparative study of the bacterial flora in the surroundings, the root canals and sockets of deciduous molars. Int Dent J 1971; 21:375-388.

6.       Brook I, Grimm S, Kielich RB. Bacteriology of acute periapical abscess in children. Journal of Endodontics. 1981;7(8):378–80.

7.       Mejàre B. Streptococcus salivarius, Streptococcus sanguis and Streptococcus “mitis” as indicators of contamination of root canal cultures. Odontol Revy 1975;26(2):125–34.

8.       Sato I, Kurihara-Ando N, Kota K, Iwaku M, Hoshino E. Sterilization of infected root-canal dentine by topical application of a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline in situ. IntEndod J 1996; 29: 118–24.

9.       Hoshino E, Kurihara-Ando N, Sato I, Uematsu H, Sato M, Kota K, Iwaku M. In-vitro antibacterial susceptibility of bacteria taken from infected root dentine to a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline. IntEndod J 1996; 29: 125–30.

10.     Van Winkelhoff AJ, Herrera D, Oteo A, et al. Antimicrobial profiles of periodontal pathogens isolated from periodontitis patients in the Netherlands and Spain. J ClinPeriodont 2005;32:893–8.

11.     Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 2016 ;6(2):71–9.

12.     Dhillon JS, Amita, Saini SK, Bedi HS, Ratol SS, Gill B. Healing of a large periapical lesion using triple antibiotic paste and intracanal aspiration in nonsurgical endodontic retreatment. Indian Journal of Dentistry 2014;5(3):161-165.

13.     Manuel ST, Parolia A, Kundabala M, Vikram M. Non-surgical endodontic therapy using triple-antibiotic paste. Kerala Dental Journal 2010; 33:88–90.

14.     Vijayaraghavan R, Mathian VM, Sundaram AM, Karunakaran R, Vinodh S. Triple antibiotic paste in root canal therapy. Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences 2012; 4(2):230-233.

15.     William W, 3rd, Teixeira F, Levin L, Sigurdsson A, Trope M. Disinfection of immature teeth with a triple antibiotic paste. J Endod 2005; 31:439–43.

16.     Soory M. A role for non-antimicrobial actions of tetracyclines in combating oxidative stress in periodontal and metabolic diseases: A literature review. Open Dent J 2008; 2:5–12.

17.     Kim JH, Kim Y, Shin SJ, Park JW, Jung IY. Tooth discoloration of immature permanent incisor associated with triple antibiotic therapy: A case report. J Endod 2010; 36:1086-91.

18.     Hoshino E, Kurihara-Ando N, Sato I, Uematsu H, Sato M, Kota K, et al. In-vitro antibacterial susceptibility of bacteria taken from infected root dentine to a mixture of ciprofloxacin, metronidazole and minocycline. Int Endod J 1996; 29:125-30.

19.     Hosseini MM, Zare JM, Fesharaki M, Ostad SM. Cytotoxicity of Triple Antibiotic Paste and Calcium Hydroxide against Cultured Human Dental Pulp Fibroblasts. J Dent Sch 2015; 33(3): 196-204.

20.     Fulzele P, Baliga S, Thosar N, Pradhan D. Evaluation of calcium ion, hydroxyl ion release and pH levels in various calcium hydroxide based intracanal medicaments: An in vitro study. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry 2011; 2(4):291-295.

21.     Brenda P. F. A. Gomes, Morgana E. Vianna, Alexandre A. Zaia José Flávio A. Almeida, Francisco J. Souza-FilhoCaio C. R. Ferraz. Chlorhexidine in Endodontics.Brazilian Dental Journal 2013;24(2): 89-102.

22.     Ferraz CC, Gomes BP, Zaia AA, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro assessment of the antimicrobial action and the mechanical ability of chlorhexidine gel as an endodontic irrigant. J Endod 2001;27:452-455.

23.     Pinheiro ET, Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Teixeira FB, Zaia AA, Souza Filho FJ. Evaluation of root canal microorganisms isolated from teeth with endodontic failure and their antimicrobial susceptibility. Oral MicrobiolImmunol 2003;18:100-103.

24.     Siqueira JF Jr, BatistaMM, FragaRC, deUzeda M. Antibacterial effects of endodontic irrigants on black-pigmented gram-negative anaerobes and facultative bacteria. J Endod 1998; 24:414-6.

25.     Burton, J. P., Chilcott, C. N., Moore, C. J., Speiser, G. and Tagg, J. R. A preliminary study of the effect of probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 on oral malodour parameters. J Appl Microbiol. 2006; 100: 754–764.

26.     Sabrah AH, Yassen GH, Spolnik KJ, Hara AT, Platt JA, Gregory RL. Evaluation of Residual Antibacterial Effect of Human Radicular Dentin Treated with Triple and Double Antibiotic Pastes. J Endod. 2015 ; 41(7):1081-4.

 

 

Received on 05.11.2017        Modified on 07.12.2017

Accepted on 29.12.2017        © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2018; 11(4):1327-1330.

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00247.0