Effect of different Processing and Preservation Techniques on Lycopene: A Mini Review
Shruti Rawat1, Arshi Siddiqui2*, Rajat Singh3
1Department of Food Technology, School of Applied and Life sciences,
Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, 248007 – India.
2Department of Post Harvest Process and Food Engineering,
G. B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand, 263145 – India.
3College of Horticulture and Forestry, Thunag, Mandi, Himachal Pradesh, 175048 – India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: arshi669@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
Lycopene is the principle pigment found in the majority of the red fruits and vegetables. It is rich in so many medicinal properties. Tomato and its processed products are also a good source of lycopene. Around 85% lycopene is found in tomato and its processed products. The bright red, eye catching hue of ripen tomato is a gift of this lycopene to the tomato.The growing demand of lycopene results in the major production of its products. Processing temperatures leads to the decreased quality of the lycopene in the final product. Isomerization and oxidation are mainly responsible for this. So, a proper processing time and temperature is needed which will deliver the lycopene in its full potential form to the consumers.
KEYWORDS: Preservation, Lycopene, Tomato, Pigment, Isomerization, Oxidation.
INTRODUCTION:
Carotenoids are the pigments which gives diverse colours to the fruits and vegetables. They are generally produced by the plants, algae, certain bacteria and fungi. These pigments vary from red, orange and yellow in colour. The characteristic red colour of watermelon; orange colour of pumpkin and yellow colour of banana is due to the presence of carotenoids. Carotenoids are tetraterpenoids and are of 2 kinds: (a) Carotenes: having only carbon and hydrogen atom (e.g. alpha carotene, beta carotene and lycopene) (b) xanthophyll: having 1 extra oxygen atom in addition to the group (e.g. lutein and zeaxanthin)1.
Tomato is one such good source of carotenoid and is a popular crop after potato. Lycopersiconescentulumis a rich source of fibre and vitamins. It is consumed either freshly or in a processed form like ketchup, sauce, soup and puree.
Tomato and its products are the primary source of lycopene in a diet and around 85% lycopene is present in them2, making it enriched with many antioxidant properties. Lycopene is a red colour carotenoid, responsible for the red colour of certain fruits and vegetables such as tomato, watermelon, pink grapefruit3, papaya and apricot. The first ever lycopene in tomato was detected by Millardet (1876) and then named by Schunck4.
Lycopene (C40H56) has molecular mass 536.89 Daltons. It has 13 double bonds, of which eleven are conjugated and two are unconjugated double bonds5. Lycopene is a lipophilic and octaprene (containing 8 isoprene units)6. Among all the carotenoids found in nature, lycopene has the ultimate singlet quenching ability7 that is 2- folds more than Beta- carotene and ten- folds higher than Vitamin E8 which makes it an excellent antioxidant. Lycopene rich diet can reduce the chances of cancers (lung cancer)9. It also helps in reducing prostate cancer, cardiovascular diseases and gastrointestinal diseases10.
Nowadays, tomato is emerging as the potent lycopene rich food. Apart from tomato pulp, its seed and peel are used for the lycopene production. Its by-products (processed) are often neglected and either used as the animal feed or are thrown away which leads to the major wastage. Various studies have shown that its by-products also contain a good amount of lycopene in them. So utilising these by products can also lead to low wastage and sustainability.
Increasing demand leads the focus in the manufacturing process of this pigment. Its product as ketchup, sauce and juice are consumed worldwide. However, these processed products went through a lot of treatment (heating, cooking) which can lead to the loss or degradation of this valuable pigment thus, affecting the health benefits as well as their appearance (colour). So, these products should be processed in a way that it will lead to less deterioration and reach the consumer with its full potential. This review focuses on the lycopene, its sources, extraction methods, preservation methods and its impact on lycopene.
Sources of Lycopene:
Lycopene can be obtained by natural resources (plants, algae),chemical synthesis and microbially(fungi, bacteria).Human beings can not synthesize lycopene, they get it by their food which get stored in adipose tissue and liver (in large amount) and in kidney and lungs (in small amount)11.
Dietary sources:
Red colour fruits and vegetables are the primary dietary sources of lycopene. Ample amount of lycopene can be found in tomato, rosehip12, guava, watermelon, pink grapefruit3, dried apricots and papaya13 which give them their red colour. It can also be found in the seeds and peels14of some fruits and vegetables.
Tomato and tomato based products contain ample amount of lycopene in them. Major tomato products (processed) consist of tomato juice, soup, ketchup and sauce. Around 85% lycopene alone can be found in them2. However, the lycopene content varies in tomato from variety to variety. By products of tomato processing (including skin and seeds) also consists of high amount of lycopene in them. Dietary sources of lycopene are given in Table 1.
DietarySources |
Content (mg/100g) |
Tomatoes (Red) |
3.1 – 7.44 |
Guava |
5.23 – 5.50 |
Watermelon |
23 – 72 |
Raw Rosehip |
12.9 – 35.2 |
Microbial sources:
The lycopene produced by microbial sources has advantages such as high yield and high quality. It was reported in a study that Blakesleatrisporais an excellent lycopene source in nature and it produces lycopene which has high content, quality and nutritional value than tomatoes19.
It wasmentioned that Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiaecan also be used for producing lycopene and the later one is considered as a safer host but the production of lycopene is higher in E.coli20. As reported by this study, there was a higher yield of 22- fold in lycopene in S.cerevisiae by combining host engineering with pathway engineering. Microbial lycopene sources are mentioned in Table 2.
Lycopene is red in colour having molecular weight 536.89 g/mol14 and chemical formula C40H56. Its melting point is between 171°C to 176°C21 and it contains eleven (11) conjugated and two unconjugated bonds. These conjugated bonds are responsible for the colour in lycopene11. Due to lack of provitamin A activity (absence of terminal Beta-ionic ring)4, its biochemistry is different from alpha carotene and beta- carotene7.
Lycopene is lipophilic, containing elongated needles (red) in crystal form4. Its powder is dark-reddish brown in colour14. Due to its acyclic structure, it is water insoluble4and soluble in hexane, acetone and oil14.
Sources |
Content (mg/g) |
Saccharomyces cerevisiae |
2.43 |
Phycomyces |
15 |
Yarrowialipolytica |
16 |
Properties |
Result |
Colour |
Vibrant Red |
Chemical Formula |
C40H56 |
Stable at pH |
3.5 – 4.5 |
Melting point |
Between 171°C and 176°C |
Extraction of Lycopene:
Solvent Extraction is the extraction method in which two (immiscible) liquids are used to separate the compounds (on solubility basis). This method includes uses of organic solvents like ether and hexane. This method is the most reliable and widely used method for the extraction of carotenoids. As lycopene get easily solubilized in solvents so extraction by this method is easy. Theresearch was done on extraction of lycopene from tomato pomace (using solvent extraction method) by optimizing the conditions favourable for the extraction. The maintained conditions by them were temperature at 40°C, time of 5hours and Acetone and ethyl acetate in the ratio of 1:1. They obtained a 611.105 mg/100g yield of lycopene25.
Supercritical fluid extraction uses fluid above supercritical point for extraction26. This method is best for extracting and purifying low volatile and heat sensitive compounds27.The authorused tomato peel (by product) for extracting lycopene by supercritical fluid extraction28. In that paper, the authors detected the impact of various parameters (temperature, flow rate of CO2 and pressure) on extraction. They found that the favourable conditions were at the temperature of 90°C and Pressure of 40 MPa in which around fifty six percent (56%) lycopene was retrieved. Supercritical liquids increase the rate and efficiency of the reaction. A similar method also performed using CO2 for extracting lycopene and beta carotene from the ripe tomatoes. The conditions maintained were 40°C to 80°C (temperature) and 2500 to 4000psi (pressure). Recovered lycopene was sixty five percent (65%) at 4000psi (Pressure) and 80 °C (temperature)29. The flow diagram for supercriticalextraction of lycopene from tomato is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.SupercriticalExtraction of lycopene from tomato
Enzymes are well known for their specificity and efficiency. The plant cell wall consists of polysaccharides in them due to which the diffusivity of solute decreases30. Enzymes usage improves the yield as they act on these polysaccharides and help in loosening the structure31 and increasing porosity. This method is highly efficient for inflammable compounds and lacks toxicity.Theresearch was done on extraction of lycopene from the processed waste of tomato using enzymes. Tomato peels were treated with the pectinases and cellulases (enzymes) followed by extraction with solvent (hexane). They found the maximum lycopene (which was 8 – 18 times high than non treated peel) was at 30°C with enzyme load of 0.16 kg/kg32.
Microwave Assisted Extraction uses microwaves (which ranged between 300 Megahertz to 300 Gigahertz33. Microwave radiation heat the sample and rise in temperature causes release of solutes by cell rupturing34. This process is also referred as ― Green Technology due to less usage of solvents33. In this method, high pressure (inside cell) builds up and causes their disruption due to which inside material (solute) diffuse out34.
Ultrasound Assisted Extraction method uses the phenomenon of cavitation. Ultrasound waves (> 20 Kilohertz) are used for extraction of valuable compounds. This technique involves placing of mixture of sample and solvent in ultrasonic bath33. Then waves are generated and lead to the formation of bubbles which on rupturing, causes breakage of plant cells35. This allows the increased permeability of solvents. Maximum lycopene content (100%) found at temperature (45°C) for 50 min (extraction time)36. The various advantages and disadvantages of different extraction methods of lycopene are given in Table 4.
Method |
Advantage |
Limitation |
Solvent Extraction Method |
· Easytouse |
· Expensive · Time consuming |
Supercritical fluid Extraction |
· Best for lowvolatile compounds · Highyield |
· Need cosolvent · Plant setup cost is high |
Enzyme Assisted Extraction |
· Environment friendly · No toxicity |
· Enzyme unstability · Costly enzyme recovery |
Microwave Assisted Extraction |
· Less solventusage · High yield |
· Costly equipment |
Ultrasonic Assisted Extraction |
· Rapid · Energy saving |
· Depend on particle size |
Food preservation is the method of prolonging product life by elimination or inhibition of microbes from the food. It preserves the nutritive values and colour of the product so that it can be used later in the off season. Pickling and salting are the traditional method of preserving food which uses oil and salt as a tool for microbial prevention. Application of various methods ensure the retainment of nutritional qualities of food as well as provide varieties like jam, pickles which can be enjoyed in any season. Withdraw of total water from the food is termed as Dehydration. This method removes all the water which can be used by microbes for their survival thus extending the shelf life of food.Some preservation techniques are:
Freeze drying, popularly known as Lyophilisation dehydrates the product by withdrawing the ice at lower pressure using the sublimation process. Sublimation involves conversion from solid to gaseous state40. This technique offers a superior quality produce with an extended shelf life. This method completely removes water making it unavailable for the microbes to sustain and producing a dehydrated produce.
The process of Lyophilisation includes 3 steps41. First step involves freezing of solvent at a much reduced temperature (nearly around -70° C to -80° C). Second step contain partly drying of solvent by lowering pressure. Lastly, the remaining water is removed by desorption (Secondary Drying).Freeze drying ensures that the freshness and initial quality of the produce remain preserved. That is possible because of the inhibition of the chemical and microbial activity.
Vacuum drying:
Vacuum drying withdraws all the moisture and creates a vacuum. This method prohibits the produce from getting oxidized and retains their colour and aroma42.This technique is ideal for thermo liable materials43. It need less drying time as it operates at reduced temperature.
Microwave Drying:
This method involves usage of microwaves which enter the material and convert moisture into heat. In this process, microwaves penetrate the material surface and cause the reorientation of water molecules (dipole moment) which creates heat energy and evaporates the moisture of the food. Microwave drying is used to dry chips.
Lycopene is the principle pigment of tomato and its products which gives them red colour. It has many beneficial health effects and is widely known for its antioxidant activity. Tomato and its products are the primary dietary sources of lycopene. More lycopene is available in its processed form as compared to the fresh form, so the demand of these processed products (as a lycopene rich food or as a functional food) is increasing. However, these processed products went through a lot of treatment (heating, cooking) which can lead to the loss or degradation of this valuable pigment thus, affecting the health benefits as well as their appearance (colour).
Isomerization and Oxidation are the two major reasons behind the destruction of lycopene. At extreme temperature, lycopene undergoes isomerization which has major role in affecting quality. Lycopene naturally exists as all trans isomer but under these conditions, it get transformed into the cis-form44. These cis- forms are very sensitive to oxidation which creates an undesirable effect of lycopene. Autoxidation leads to the lycopene fragmentation and formation of different undesirable compounds and forms an undesirable flavour45. It is an irreversible process.
Various researches till now have been taken place to find a suitable process which can preserve maximum lycopene. The researcher foundthat a rise in the temperature of drying (70°C to 80°C) in a cabinet air drier will speed up the deterioration of lycopene46. So, drying of tomatoes should be done below 70°C for better retention of lycopene. It wasreporteddryingof tomato at 3 different temperatures (40°C, 50°C and 60°C) by convection hot air drying with an air velocity of 1.5 m/s. The result was that the highest lycopene was found at 60°C47.
The research was done to investigate the effect of microwave drying on antioxidant activities of tomato in which they subjected tomato to 2 different time (30s and 300s). Results showed that highest lycopene was found in tomato treated at 300s i.e. 40.71 mg/kg fresh matter which showed that increase in treatment time provides good results48.
The author studied the effect of heating and exposure to light on lycopene by placing tomato puree to various temperatures i.e., 60°C, 80°C, 100°C and 120°C for 1 to 6 hours and exposure to light for 1 to 6 days. He found that exposure at 60°C and 80°C temperature increased the lycopene isomerization. However light exposure did not showed much change3.
The researchers evaluated the lycopene and antioxidant activities subjected to 2 methods of drying i.e., Oven drying and Freeze Drying. They found that oven drying cause less damage to lycopene in comparison to freeze drying and cause an increase in it49. The rise is because of withdrawal of pigments from the matrix (due to thermal treatment)50. Another researcher also mentioned that air dried tomatoes had more extractable lycopene than freeze dried tomatoes51.
However there is so inconsistency in these results which can be because of different variety, treatment time and temperature and softness of tomato. Damage caused to the lycopene totally depends on the type of treatment used.
Lycopene is the pigment which impart colour to the many plants and algae. It is a red hue which gives many fruits and vegetables their characteristic colour. Apart from colour, it also offers many health benefits. Its unique structure is responsible for its antioxidant activity. This red hue is predominantly found in all trans form which is known as the most thermostable form. Tomatoes are cheap and easily available which make them consumed widely around the globe. They possess many nutritive values due to presence of lycopene in them. As the primary source of lycopene and a healthy food, its demand is increasing as a functional food. Due to which the main focus is to develop a product with the high nutritional value. It is becoming popular as a functional food due to high level of nutritional value. Tomatoes have high moisture content due to which they easily get spoiled by the microbes. So, preservation is required for them. That’s why they are converted into powders, ketchup and other products. These processed products are passed through a number of steps exposing them to high temperature. However lycopene is stable at low temperature but extreme conditions causes theunstability and isomerization of lycopene by changing it from trans to cis form which is very reactive to oxygen and causes oxidation resulting in off- flavour and dull appearance along with reduced health benefits. High temperature causes changes in the lycopene and indirectly degrades the bioactive compounds and a low quality product is obtained.So, to ensure that the lycopene should reach safely in its fully potential form to the customers, a suitable processing time and temperature is needed. A process that maintains the quality of lycopene throughout its processing will benefit to the food industry.
REFERENCES:
1. Stahl W, Sies H. Antioxidant activity of carotenoids. Molecular Aspects of Medicine. 2003; 24(6): 345-51.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-2997(03)00030-X
2. Padmanabhan P et al. Solanaceous fruits including tomato, eggplant, and peppers. Encyclopedia of Food & Health. 2016; 24-32.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384947-2.00696-6
3. Shi J et al. Effect of heating and exposure to light on the stability of lycopene in tomato purée. Food Control. 2008; 19(5): 514-20.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.06.002
4. Kong KW et al. Revealing the power of the natural red pigment lycopene. Molecules. 2010; 15(2): 959-87.doi: 10.3390/molecules15020959
5. Ono M et al. Mechanism of the anticancer effect of lycopene (tetraterpenoids). The Enzymes. 2015; 37: 139-66.https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.enz.2015.06.002
6. Camara M et al. Lycopene: a review of chemical and biological activity related to beneficial health effects. Studies in Natural Products Chemistry. 2013; 40: 383-426.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59603-1.00011-4
7. vanBreemen RB, Pajkovic N. Multitargeted therapy of cancer by lycopene. Cancer Letters. 2008; 269(2): 339-51.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2008.05.016
8. Mohammed MI, Malami DI. Effect of Heat Treatment on the Lycopene Content of Tomato Puree. Chem Search Journal. 2013; 4(1): 18-21.https://doi.org/10.4314/CSJ.V4I1
9. Palozza P, Simone RE, Catalano A, Mele MC. Tomato lycopene and lung cancer prevention: from experimental to human studies. Cancers. 2011; 3(2): 2333-57.https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers3022333
10. Anlar HG, Bacanli M. Lycopene as an antioxidant in human health and diseases. In Pathology. 2020; pp. 247-254. Academic Press.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815972-9.00024-X
11. Bansal M et al. Chemopreventive role of dietary phytochemicals in colorectal cancer. Advances in Molecular Toxicology. 2018;12:69-121.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64199-1.00004-X
12. Stahl W, Sies H. Lycopene: a biologically important carotenoid for humans?. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 1996;336(1):1-9.https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1996.0525
13. Krinsky NI, Johnson EJ. Carotenoid actions and their relation to health and disease. Molecular Aspects of Medicine. 2005;26(6):459-516.doi: 10.1016/j.mam.2005.10.001
14. Caseiro M et al. Lycopene in human health. Lwt. 2020;127:109323.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2020.109323
15. Singh P, Goyal GK. Dietary lycopene: Its properties and anticarcinogenic effects. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2008;7(3):255-70.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2008.00044.x
16. Basuny AM. The anti-atherogenic effects of lycopene. InLipoproteins-Role in Health and Diseases. 2012. IntechOpen.https://doi.org/10.5772/48134
17. Amin ARet al. Perspectives for cancer prevention with natural compounds. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 2009;27(16):2712.https://doi.org/10.1200%2FJCO.2008.20.6235
18. Böhm Fet al. Carotenoids protect against cell membrane damage by the nitrogen dioxide radical. Nature Medicine. 1995;1(2):98-9.https://doi.org/10.1038/NM0295-98
19. Wang HBet al. High-quality lycopene overaccumulation via inhibition of γ-carotene and ergosterolbiosyntheses in Blakesleatrispora. Journal of Functional Foods. 2014;7:435-42.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2014.01.014
20. Chen SJet al. Antioxidative reaction of carotenes against peroxidation of fatty acids initiated by nitrogen dioxide: A theoretical study. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 2015;119(30):9640-50.https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b04142
21. Guardia MDet al. A carotenogenic enzyme aggregate in Phycomyces: evidence from quantitive complementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 1971;68(9):2012-5.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.68.9.2012
22. Matthäus Fet al. Production of lycopene in the non-carotenoid-producing yeast Yarrowialipolytica. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2014;80(5):1660-9.https://doi.org/10.1128%2FAEM.03167-13
23. Krishnaiah Det al. A critical review on the spray drying of fruit extract: Effect of additives on physicochemical properties. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2014;54(4):449-73.https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2011.587038
24. Okonogi S, Riangjanapatee P. Physicochemical characterization of lycopene-loaded nanostructured lipid carrier formulations for topical administration. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2015; 478(2):726-35.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.12.002
25. Pandya D et al. Standardization of solvent extraction process for Lycopene extraction from tomato pomace. J. Appl. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2017;2(1):12-6.https://doi.org/10.15406/JABB.2017.02.00019
26. Díaz-Reinoso Bet al. Supercritical CO2 extraction and purification of compounds with antioxidant activity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2006;54(7):2441-69.https://doi.org/10.1021/JF052858J
27. Shilpi Aet al. Supercritical CO_2 extraction of compounds with antioxidant activity from fruits and vegetables waste-a review. Focusing on Modern Food Industry. 2013;2(1):43-62.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.06.098
28. Machmudah Set al. Lycopene extraction from tomato peel by-product containing tomato seed using supercritical carbon dioxide. Journal of Food Engineering. 2012;108(2):290-6.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.08.012
29. Cadoni Eet al. Supercritical CO2 extraction of lycopene and β-carotene from ripe tomatoes. Dyes and Pigments. 1999;44(1):27-32.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0143-7208(99)00065-0
30. Nadar SSet al. Enzyme assisted extraction of biomolecules as an approach to novel extraction technology: A review. Food Research International. 2018;108:309-30.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.03.006
31. Sowbhagya HB, Chitra VN. Enzyme-assisted extraction of flavorings and colorants from plant materials. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. 2010;50(2):146-61.https://doi.org/10.1080/10408390802248775
32. Zuorro Aet al. Enzyme-assisted extraction of lycopene from tomato processing waste. Enzyme and Microbial Technology. 2011;49(6-7):567-73.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enzmictec.2011.04.020
33. Rehman MUet al. Introduction to natural products analysis. In Recent Advances in Natural Products Analysis. 2020; pp. 3-15. Elsevier.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816455-6.00001-9
34. Gomez L, Tiwari B, Garcia-Vaquero M. Emerging extraction techniques: Microwave-assisted extraction. In Sustainable Seaweed Technologies. 2020; pp. 207-224. Elsevier.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-817943-7.00008-1
35. Rocha-Santos T, Duarte AC. Analysis of Marine Samples in Search of Bioactive Compounds. Elsevier. 2014.https://doi.org/10.1016/c2013-0-13695-1
36. Eh AL, Teoh SG. Novel modified ultrasonication technique for the extraction of lycopene from tomatoes. Ultra sonics sonochemistry. 2012;19(1):151-9.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2011.05.019
37. Roldán-Gutiérrez JM, de Castro MD. Lycopene: the need for better methods for characterization and determination. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry. 2007;26(2):163-70.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2006.11.013
38. Ascenso Aet al. The effect of lycopene preexposure on UV-B-irradiated human keratinocytes. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. 2016;2016.https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8214631
39. Chandra Ret al. Bioreactor for algae cultivation and biodiesel production. In Bioreactors 2020; pp. 289-307. Elsevier.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821264-6.00015-2
40. Nowak D, Jakubczyk E. The freeze-drying of foods—The characteristic of the process course and the effect of its parameters on the physical properties of food materials. Foods. 2020;9(10):1488.https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9101488
41. YadegariAet al. Specific considerations in scaffold design for oral tissue engineering. Biomaterials for Oral and Dental Tissue Engineering. 2017; 157-83.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100961-1.00010-4
42. Punathil L, Basak T. Microwave processing of frozen and packaged food materials: experimental. 2016.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100596-5.21009-3
43. Ngamwonglumlert L, Devahastin S. Microstructure and its relationship with quality and storage stability of dried foods. InFood microstructure and its relationship with quality and stability. 2018; pp. 139-159. Woodhead Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100764-8.00008-3
44. Shi J et al. Lycopene degradation and isomerization in tomato dehydration. Food Research International. 1999;32(1):15-21.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(99)00059-9
45. Xianquan S et al. Stability of lycopene during food processing and storage. Journal of Medicinal Food. 2005;8(4):413-22.https://doi.org/10.1089/JMF.2005.8.413
46. Demiray Eet al. Degradation kinetics of lycopene, β-carotene and ascorbic acid in tomatoes during hot air drying. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 2013;50(1):172-6.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2012.06.001
47. Kaur Ret al. Effect of drying temperatures and storage on chemical and bioactive attributes of dried tomato and sweet pepper. Lwt. 2020;117:108604.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108604
48. Mahieddine Bet al. Effects of microwave heating on the antioxidant activities of tomato (Solanumlycopersicum). Annals of Agricultural Sciences. 2018;63(2):135-9.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2018.09.001
49. Tan Set al. Lycopene, polyphenols and antioxidant activities of three characteristic tomato cultivars subjected to two drying methods. Food Chemistry. 2021;338:128062.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128062
50. Dewanto Vet al. Thermal processing enhances the nutritional value of tomatoes by increasing total antioxidant activity. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2002;50(10):3010-4.https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0115589
51. Kerkhofs NSet al. Change in colour and antioxidant content of tomato cultivars following forced-air drying. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition. 2005;60(3):117-21.https://doi.org/10.1007/S11130-005-6839-8
Received on 23.12.2021 Modified on 02.07.2022
Accepted on 10.12.2022 © RJPT All right reserved
Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2023; 16(5):2537-2542.
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00417