The Significance of Serum CA-125 in patients with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome and its Association with their Hormonal Status

 

Salwa Khadoor1*, Rama Ibrahim2, Faisal Redwan3

1Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tishreen University, Lattakia, Syria.

2Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tishreen University, Lattakia, Syria.

3Department of Laboratory Medicine, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tishreen University, Lattakia, Syria.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: khadoorsalwa@gmail.com, ramaibrahim@tishreen.edu.sy

 

ABSTRACT:

Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine disorder affecting women of reproductive age. Due to the diagnostic uncertainty of some cases and the unclear pathophysiology of the syndrome, this study aimed to assess the significance of Cancer Antigen 125(CA-125) in the diagnosis and prediction of hormonal disorders of PCOS patients. Method and Results: A total of 100 women (70 PCOS patients and 30 healthy females) were enrolled in our case-control prospective study. Both groups were of similar age (mean age 23.97 vs 24.40 years, P=0.2), while body mass index (BMI) was significantly elevated in the PCOS group compared to controls (25.72 vs 20.95kg/m2, P=0.0001). Hirsutism was estimated using the modified Ferriman-Gallwey (mFG) scoring system. A significantly elevated hirsutism score was recorded in the PCOS group compared to controls (11.72 vs 4.50, P=0.0001). Biochemical tests including CA-125 and pituitary/gonadal hormones [luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and total testosterone] were all measured on serum samples. A statistically significant increase in LH levels (9.26 vs 3.89mIU/ml, P=0.0001), LH/FSH ratio (1.88 vs 0.67, P=0.0001) and total testosterone levels (88.93 vs 33.15ng/dl, P=0.0001) was observed in PCOS compared to controls. No significant difference was found in the FSH levels between the two groups (P=0.06). Interestingly, the CA-125 level was significantly higher in PCOS patients than in controls (17.90 vs 7.78 U/L, P=0,0001). CA-125 was positively correlated with LH and LH/FSH ratio, and negatively with FSH. The receiver operation characteristic curve was performed to determine a diagnostic cut-off value of CA-125 for PCOS. A CA-125 value of 11.45 U/L showed high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity (96.7% and 87.1%, respectively) for PCOS. Conclusion: Data from this study suggest that CA-125 could be used as an additional diagnostic biomarker for PCOS.

 

KEYWORDS: PCOS, CA-125, Diagnosis, Luteinizing hormone (LH), LH/FSH ratio.

 

 


INTRODUCTION: 

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is the most common endocrine disorder in reproductive-aged women with a prevalence of 5% to 10%1. It was first described in 1935 by Stein and Leventhal who reported the association between polycystic ovaries and amenorrhea2. PCOS is characterized by a heterogeneous spectrum of signs and symptoms, with hyperandrogenism, infrequent ovulation and multiple follicular cystic ovaries of increased size and being the most encountered3.

 

Hormonal disruptions are common in women with PCOS, as the condition is often associated with increased levels of luteinizing hormone (LH), decreased or normal levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and excessive secretion of ovarian and/or adrenal androgens, which leads to certain clinical manifestations such as hirsutism and acne4. The 2003 modified Rotterdam criteria are currently recommended for the diagnosis of PCOS, in which two of the following criteria must be present: (1) chronic anovulation, (2) clinical/biochemical hyperandrogenism and (3) polycystic ovaries on ultrasound5. The exact cause of PCOS is unknown, however, multiple factors including genetic, environmental, inflammatory and psychological factors may be involved6. In addition to reproductive and dermatological consequences, PCOS can also be associated with metabolic issues including obesity, insulin resistance, hyperinsulinemia and dyslipidemia. As a result, women with PCOS are at increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD)7. The syndrome may also be associated with hypothyroidism leading to worsening symptoms8. The altered metabolic and hormonal status in PCOS patients can lead to serious gynecological abnormalities and complications, such as certain types of cancer including endometrial, ovarian, breast cancers or others. Several studies have indicated that estrogen excess, insulin resistance and obesity are potential mechanisms of endometrial hyperplasia and cancer development in PCOS9–11. PCOS may increase the risk of ovarian cancer, possibly due to continued exposure to androgens11. Although there is no clear correlation between ovarian cancer, endometriosis and PCOS, they share common risk factors. However, this complication of PCOS remains controversial12. Clinical settings have highlighted the importance of health education through structured awareness programs on PCOS among adolescent girls, which helps in early diagnosis to prevent its long-term complications13. Changing lifestyle is one of the first-line treatments to improve reproductive and/or metabolic function in PCOS patients. The treatment plan could also include medical agents if necessary, such as insulin sensitizers like metformin, hormonal contraceptives, or anti-androgens 14. Studies have also referred to herbal treatment as an effective option for PCOS due to its limited side effects compared to medications15. Phytotherapy with a potential effect on PCOS patients include fennel16, mint tea17 or a herbal mixture commercialized as Hinguvachadi choornam drug18. Melatonin and vitamin D are also thought to play a positive role in improving symptoms related to this syndrome19,20.

 

Cancer antigen 125 (CA-125) is a high-molecular-weight glycoprotein encoded by mucin 16 (MUC16)  gene21. It belongs to the mucins family of proteins that are involved in cell adhesion, signaling and protection of epithelial surfaces22. CA-125 is expressed by epithelial cells which line many body cavities such as endometrial, ovarian, corneal and bronchial, as well as those of the digestive tract23,24. Plasma concentration of CA-125 increases under certain physiological conditions, such as menstruation, and in Non-neoplastic cases like heart failure, liver diseases and endometriosis. CA-125 levels also increase in many cancers, such as lung, pancreatic, breast and ovarian cancers25–27. CA-125 plays a crucial role in the medical field, particularly in the diagnosis, monitoring, and management of ovarian cancer. It has proven to be a useful tool in prediction, prognosis and assessment of treatment response28. The importance of CA-125 in PCOS has not been precisely studied. However, two separate studies showed conflicting results ranging from no significant difference in CA-125 levels between women with and without PCOS24 , to a highly significant seven-fold increase in serum CA-125 levels in women with PCOS compared to controls29. Due to the controversial findings describing the role of CA-125 in PCOS morbidity, our study aimed to evaluate the levels of CA-125 in women with PCOS and assess its relationship with the hormonal imbalance associated with the syndrome. The results of this current study may shed light on the role of CA-125 in PCOS pathogenesis and its potential subsequent complications.

 

MATERIALS AND METHOD:

Study design and participants:

A comparative case-control study was carried out at the gynecology department of Tishreen Hospital in Lattakia, Syria from 5 November 2022 to 30 September 2023. A total of 100 participants, divided into 70 women diagnosed with PCOS and 30 healthy controls, were included in the present study. PCOS diagnosis was made by clinicians according to Rotterdam criteria; ovarian ultrasound was performed for all patients to confirm the diagnosis. Exclusion criteria were as follows: pituitary, thyroid or adrenal disorders, previous use of hormonal treatment before the study, patients with chronic liver and heart disease, and presence of any endometrial abnormality or any type of cancer.

 

Data collection and measurements:

Demographic information including age, weight and height was collected, and Body mass index (BMI) was calculated according to the following equation: BMI= weight (kg)/height. The presence of polycystic ovaries was confirmed by ultrasound detection. Hirsutism was estimated by the modified Ferriman-Gallwey (mFG) scoring system, which visually assesses and quantifies the amount of terminal body and facial hair growth in nine areas of the body (upper lip, chin, chest, arm, upper abdomen, lower abdomen, upper back, lower back and thighs). A score of 0–4 was assigned to each area examined, such that a score of 0 represented the absence of terminal hairs, a score of 1 represented minimally evident terminal hair growth, and a score of 4 was given when extensive terminal hair growth equivalent to a hairy man was observed. A total mFG score of ≥8 signifies hirsutism 30. Blood samples were collected between the 3rd and 5th day of the menstrual cycle. Progesterone treatment has been used to induce bleeding in women with amenorrhea. Blood was collected on dried red tubes to obtain serum samples. CA-125 was tested using the Automated Immunoassay Analyzer 360. Hormones including LH, FSH, and total testosterone (only 30 patients and 30 controls were assessed for total testosterone) were measured using a Fine Care device.

 

 

Statistical analysis:

Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20 was used for data analysis. Data were examined for normal distribution using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test before making static comparisons. Values were expressed as mean ± standard deviation or number (percentage). The independent T-student test was used to compare the means of two independent groups. Pearson correlation was used to study the association between quantitative variables. The receiver operation characteristic curve (ROC Curve) was used to analyze the optimal cut-off value of CA-125 for predicting PCOS. Results were considered statistically significant when p-value ˂ 0.05. This study was approved by the scientific research ethics committee at Tishreen University No. 4461 dated 25/8/2022.

 

RESULTS:

Population characteristics:

The study sample included 70 PCOS patients (mean age 23.97±0.2 years) and 30 controls (mean age 24.40±1.9). No significant difference was found in the mean age of both groups (P=0.2). On the contrary, hirsutism and BMI scores were significantly higher in PCOS patients compared to controls (11.72±2.4 vs 4.50±1.6, P= 0.0001) and (25,72±3.1 vs 20.95±2.04kg/m2, P=0.0001), respectively (Table 1). Among PCOS patients, 50% were overweight and 12.9% were obese according to the classification of the World Health Organization (WHO) for BMI (https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/themes/topics/topic-details/GHO/body-mass-index), whereas only 3.3% of controls were overweight and none were obese (Table 2).

 

Comparison of CA-125 and hormone profile (LH, FSH, LH/FSH and total testosterone) between PCOS patients and controls:

CA-125 and hormone profile (LH, FSH, LH/FSH and total testosterone) were assessed for the two groups, and results are presented in Table 1. statistically significant elevated LH levels (9.26±4.9 vs 3.89±1.3mIU/ml, P=0.0001), LH/FSH ratio (1.88±1.1 vs 0.67±0.2, P=0.0001) and total testosterone levels (88.93±18.4 vs 33.15±8.3ng/dl, P=0.0001) were observed in the PCOS group compared to controls. On the other hand, no significant difference was found between the two groups regarding FSH levels (P=0.06). CA-125 levels were significantly higher in PCOS patients than in controls (17.90±6.4 vs 7.78±2.9 U/L, P=0,0001). It should be noted that CA-125 levels in both groups were both within normal limits (1.9-20.1 U/L).

 

Table 1: Comparison of demographic information and serum biochemical findings between PCOS patients and controls.

 

Control group

PCOS group

P-value

Sig.

N=30

N=70

AGE years)

24.40 ± 1.9

23.97 ± 0.2

0.2

NS

BMI (kg/m2)

20.95 ± 2.04

25.72 ± 3.1

0.0001

S

Hirsutism

4.50 ± 1.6

11.72 ± 2.4

0.0001

S

LH (2.4-12.6 mIU/ml)

3.89 ± 1.3

9.26 ± 4.9

0.0001

S

FSH (3.5-12.5 mIU/ml)

6.35 ± 2.2

5.32 ± 1.8

0.06

NS

LH/FSH

0.67 ± 0.2

1.88 ± 1.1

0.0001

S

Total Testosterone (22-80 ng/dl)

33.15 ± 8.3

88.93 ± 18.4

0.0001

S

CA-125 (1.9-20.1 U/L)

7.78 ± 2.9

17.90 ± 6.4

0.0001

S

 

Table 2: Classification of the participants according to their BMI

BMI

Control group

PCOS group

Underweight (>18.5)

3 (10%)

0 (0%)

Normal weight

(18.5-24.9)

26 (86.7%)

26 (37.1%)

Overweight (25-29.9)

1 (3.3%)

35  (50%)

Obesity >30

0 (0%)

9 (12.9%)

 

Correlation and predictive efficacy of CA-125 in PCOS:

The correlation between CA-125 and each of the LH, FSH, LH/FSH, total testosterone, BMI and mFG score was investigated using Pearson correlation analysis. The results of our study showed a statistically significant negative correlation between CA125 and FSH. Similarly, there were statistically significant positive correlations between CA-125 and both LH values and LH/FSH ratio. For the rest of the variables, no correlation was observed (Figures 1, 2, 3).

 

 

Figure 1: Pearson correlation between CA-125 and LH

 

 

Figure 2: Pearson correlation between CA-125 and FSH

 

 

Figure 3: Pearson correlation between CA-125 and LH/FSH

 

Finally, the ROC curve was performed to determine a diagnostic cut-off value of CA-125 for PCOS. The value that gave a good discrimination capacity between PCOS and controls, with a sensitivity of 96.7%, a specificity of 87.1% and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.964, was 11.45 U/L (Figure 4).

 

 

Figure 4: ROC curve analysis for PCOS prediction using serum CA-125

 

DISCUSSION:

In the present study, we reported a statistically significant elevated level of CA-125 in PCOS patients compared to non-PCOS. No potential effect was attributed to the age of patients compared to controls since the two groups were of similar ages (23.97 ± 0.2 vs 24.40±1.9 years P= 0.2). The patient's age ranged from 21 to 28 years; PCOS syndrome is most commonly reported in reproductively active women31. PCOS patients included in our study showed an increase in mean BMI compared to controls (25.72±3.1 vs. 20.95 ±2.04, P=0.0001). 50% of PCOS patients were overweight and 12.6% suffered from obesity, whereas only 3.3% of controls were overweight and no one was obese. Women with PCOS generally have an increased prevalence of overweight and central obesity32. Studies have shown that obesity is associated with a significantly higher risk of insulin resistance, considered one of the potential mechanisms for the development of PCOS 33. Furthermore, hyperinsulinemia resulting from insulin resistance could in turn lead to increased adrenal and ovarian androgen production through several mechanisms, which could also participate in the pathogenesis of PCOS34. Our result is consistent with data reported by other researchers, who demonstrated a statistically significant difference in average BMI between women with PCOS and those without       PCOS35–37.

 

Hirsutism was measured visually according to the mFG scoring system. Our study showed a statistically higher hirsutism score in PCOS patients compared to controls. Hirsutism is defined as excessive and abnormal growth of coarse body or facial hair in androgen-dependent areas, in a pattern similar to that in men38. A high prevalence of hirsutism in women with PCOS has been widely reported in the literature39,40. It is considered an important diagnostic sign of clinical hyperandrogenism since 80–90% of patients with hirsutism have hyperandrogenism7. Consistent with previously reported data, our results showed a statistically significant difference in mean total testosterone between patients and controls (88.93±18.4 vs 33.15±8.3 ng/dl, P=0.0001). According to the Rotterdam criteria, androgen excess represents an important parameter for the diagnosis of the syndrome 41. Androgen excess is expressed clinically by the presence of hirsutism and acne, as discussed above, and can be measured by laboratory tests. Testosterone (total or free) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) stand out as the most frequently used measures for hyperandrogenism 42. Studies have shown increased free or total testosterone levels in patients with PCOS 39,40,43,44. This may be partly explained by the fact that a high concentration of insulin commonly found in PCOS patients acts synergistically with luteinizing hormone to enhance theca cell androgen production 45,46. SHBG is a plasma steroid hormone-binding protein and is negatively correlated with plasma testosterone. Therefore, PCOS patients most often have decreased SHBG levels, as hyperinsulinemia can down-regulate SHBG synthesis in the liver. Vice versa, decreased levels of SHBG may lead to increased concentrations of biologically active free testosterone, which is associated with the hyperandrogenism observed in PCOS 45,47,48. However, only total testosterone was available for laboratory assessment of androgen excess in patients included in our study.

 

Disrupted pituitary hormones are a common feature of PCOS morbidity 35,49,50, PCOS patients included in our study had higher serum LH levels and LH/FSH ratios than controls. Otherwise, no significant difference was found in serum FSH levels between the two groups. The main pathophysiological mechanism of PCOS is attributed to a neuroendocrine disorder of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis 51. Many studies have reported an increase in the frequency and amplitude of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) pulses, which results in increased LH pulsatile secretion 52. This enhanced GnRH secretion favors transcription of the LH β subunit over the FSH β subunit 53. PCOS patients typically have a high LH concentration and a normal to low FSH concentration resulting in a high LH/FSH ratio (2-3/1), which is commonly used to indicate abnormal gonadotropin release in patients with PCOS 54.

 

Several hypotheses have been suggested to explain the impact of peripheral hormones on brain function, which in turn contributes to the increased GnRH/LH pulse rate 55. 1) Hyperinsulinemia could increase the activity of GnRH-releasing neurons or the pituitary response to GnRH 55. This has been proven by studies suggesting that metformin use reduces androgen levels in women with PCOS 56.

 

2) Low serum progesterone levels due to anovulation in women with PCOS could ultimately eliminate the influence of negative progesterone feedback on GnRH release57. 3) Androgen excess plays an indirect role by interfering with the ability of estrogen and progesterone to exert negative feedback suppression of GnRH/LH secretion58.

 

To date, only a few previous studies have evaluated the diagnostic significance of CA-125 in PCOS patients, and furthermore, these studies have reported conflicting results. In a study of 30 PCOS patients and 30 controls, Mujawar et al. showed a significantly higher level of CA-125 in PCOS compared to non-PCOS patients 29. Conversely, another study of 20 PCOS subjects and 20 controls reported no significant difference in CA-125 levels between the two groups. However, in this latter study, the low number of patients may have affected the results 24.

 

The present study showed a statistically significant elevated mean CA-125 in PCOS patients compared to controls, with values remaining within normal limits (1.9 - 20.1 U/L). The ROC curve was performed to determine a diagnostic cut-off value of CA-125 for PCOS. We demonstrated that 11.45 U/L constitutes a relevant threshold for the diagnosis of PCOS with high sensitivity and specificity (96.7%, and 87.1%, respectively).

 

PCOS is associated with several disorders accompanied by hormonal imbalances and increased CA-125 levels, such as ovarian cancer, endometriosis, and other benign conditions 59,60. Thus, one of the hypotheses explaining the higher CA-125 level in PCOS patients could be attributed to these underlying comorbidities. It should be noted that all previously diagnosed cancer cases were excluded from this study. However, the increased susceptibility of high-CA-125 PCOS patients to ovarian cancer is not excluded and should be closely assessed in future prospective studies. The increased level of CA-125 could be a potential effect or cause of the hormonal disruption observed in PCOS patients. Consistent with this, our results showed a statistically significant negative correlation between CA-125 and FSH levels and a statistically significant positive correlation between CA-125 and both LH level and LH/FSH ratio. However, the causal relationship between CA-125 and hormonal profile in PCOS patients needs to be evaluated in future investigative studies.

 

CONCLUSION:

CA-125 can be added as an additional diagnostic marker for PCOS after exclusion of cancers, endometriosis, and pituitary, thyroid, or adrenal disorders. The exact mechanisms underlying the development of polycystic ovary syndrome are not yet clearly understood. Thus, an explanation for the elevated CA-125 levels in PCOS patients could be a step toward unraveling this mystery. Nevertheless, characterizing the exact role of CA-125 in the pathophysiology of PCOS still requires further research.

 

ABBREVIATIONS:

PCOS          Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

CA-125       Cancer Antigen

BMI            Body Mass Index

mFG            modified Ferriman-Gallwey

LH               Luteinizing Hormone

FSH             Follicle-Stimulating Hormone

T2DM         Type2 Diabetes Mellitus

CVD            Cardiovascular Diseases

MUC 16       Mucin 16

SPSS            Statistical Package for the Social Sciences

ROC             Receiver Operation Characteristic 

WHO           World Health Organization

SHBG         Sex Hormone Binding Globulin

GnRH         Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Djuraev JA, Botirov AJ, Shaumarov AZ, Sodikova S, Kuddusova S, Turabaeva D, et al. International Journal of Medical Sciences And Clinical Research Polycystic Ovary syndrome: A Modern view on the problem International Journal of Medical Sciences and Clinical Research. 2023; 03(02): 83–7 https://doi.org/10.37547/ijmscr/Volume03Issue02-16.

2.      Stein IF, Leventhal ML. Amenorrhea associated with bilateral polycystic ovaries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1935; 29(2): 181–91.

3.      Azziz R, Carmina E, Dewailly D, Diamanti-kandarakis E, Escobar-morreale HF, Futterweit W, et al. Position Statement: Criteria for Defining Polycystic Ovary Syndrome as a Predominantly Hyperandrogenic Syndrome : An Androgen Excess Society Guideline. 2014; 91(May): 4237–45 doi: 10.1210/jc.2006-0178.

4.      Ehrmann DA. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. 2005; 1223–36.

5.      Christ JP, Cedars MI. Current Guidelines for Diagnosing PCOS. 2023;

6.      Goodarzi MO, Dumesic DA, Chazenbalk G, Azziz R. Polycystic ovary syndrome: Etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis. Nat Rev Endocrinol [Internet]. 2011; 7(4): 219–31. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2010.217

7.      Louwers Y V., Laven JSE. Characteristics of polycystic ovary syndrome throughout life. Ther Adv Reprod Heal [Internet]. 2020 Jan [cited 2023 Dec 7]; 14: 263349412091103. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/2633494120911038 .

8.      Vijey Aanandhi M, John M. The role of thyroid dysfunction and the importance of conducting regular thyroid function tests in patients with pcos: A narrative review. Res J Pharm Technol. 2018; Dec 1; 11(12): 5672–4 doi:10.5958/0974-360X.2018.01027.2.

9.      Dumesic DA, Lobo RA. Cancer risk and PCOS. Steroids [Internet]. 2013; 78(8): 782–5. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2013.04.004

10.   Zuo T, Zhu M, Xu W. Roles of oxidative stress in polycystic ovary syndrome and cancers. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2016; 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8589318.

11.   Harris HR, Terry KL. Polycystic ovary syndrome and risk of endometrial, ovarian, and breast cancer: a systematic review. Fertil Res Pract. 2016; 2(1): 1–9 doi: 10.1186/s40738-016-0029-2.

12.   Throwba HPK, Unnikrishnan L, Pangath M, Vasudevan K, Jayaraman S, Li M, et al. The epigenetic correlation among ovarian cancer, endometriosis and PCOS: A review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol [Internet]. 2022;180(May):103852. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103852

13.   Veena Kirthika S, Daggumati H, Padmanabhan K, Paul J, Sudhakar S, Senthil Selvam P. Effect of structured awareness programme on polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) among adolescent girls. Res J Pharm Technol. 2019; Dec 1; 12(12): 6097–100 doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.01059.X.

14.   Armanini D, Boscaro M, Bordin L, Sabbadin C. Controversies in the Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment of PCOS: Focus on Insulin Resistance, Inflammation, and Hyperandrogenism. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(8). doi: 10.3390/ijms23084110.

15.   Dhanalakshmi S, Dhivya C. A perspective studies on herbalism for the preventive of PCOS. Res J Pharm Technol. 2018; Dec 1; 11(12): 5417–24 doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00989.7.

16.   Chandran A, Merlin NJ, Ammu L, Dharan SS. Fennel treatment to pcos: An insilico evaluation to explore the therapeutic efficacy of anethole. Res J Pharm Technol. 2019; Oct 1; 12(10): 4958–62. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00860.6.

17.   Tamilselvi S, Nalini SJ, Vijayaraghavan R. Effectiveness of self help strategies {SHS} for PCOS among young adult girls at selected colleges at Chennai-pilot study report. Res J Pharm Technol. 2018; Jul 1; 11(7): 3145–8. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00577.2.

18.   Divya RR, Merlin NJ, Dharan SS. Hinguvachadi Choornam, An Insilico approach to confirm the Therapeutic Efficacy towards PCOS. Res J Pharm Technol. 2021; Jan 1; 14(1): 231–4. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2021.00040.8.

19.   Ahamed S, Sumitra M, Chitra V. Prevalance and role of melatonin on pcos in its treatment using herbal drugs. Res J Pharm Technol. 2021. Sep 1; 14(9): 5029–33 doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00877.

20.   Garg R, Malhotra J, Singh S, Singh R, Kokila BT, Agrawal P. Relationship between vitamin D and insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome women. J SAFOG. 2017; 9(3): 211–5 doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10006-1497.

21.   Song Y, Yuan M, Wang G, Group F. Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets Update value and clinical application of MUC16 (cancer antigen 125). Expert Opin Ther Targets [Internet]. 2023; 27(8): 745–56. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/14728222.2023.2248376

22.   McShane A, Bath J, Jaramillo AM, Ridley C, Walsh AA, Evans CM, et al. Mucus. Curr Biol. 2021; 31(15): R938–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.093.

23.   Felder M, Kapur A, Gonzalez-Bosquet J, Horibata S, Heintz J, Albrecht R, et al. MUC16 (CA125): Tumor biomarker to cancer therapy, a work in progress. Mol Cancer. 2014; 13(1): 1–15. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-13-129.

24.   Hasan HA, Selman MO, Jawad A. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: does it Increase the Level of Cancer Antigen125? Merit Res J Med Med Sci [Internet]. 2020; 8(7): 327–32. Available from: http://www.meritresearchjournals.org/mms/index.htm

25.   Monteiro S, franco F, Costa S, Monteiro P, Vieira H, Coelho L, et al. Prognostic value of CA125 in advanced heart failure patients. Int J Cardiol [Internet]. 2010; 140(1): 115–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.11.023

26.   Charkhchi P, Cybulski C, Gronwald J, Wong FO, Narod SA, Akbari MR. Ca125 and ovarian cancer: A comprehensive review. Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(12): 1–29. doi: 10.3390/cancers12123730.

27.   Balachandran A, Nayak S. An observational study of factors affecting CA125 levels in premenopausal women. Adv Biomed Res. 2023; 12(1): 235. doi: 10.4103/abr.abr_100_23.

28.   Matsas A, Stefanoudakis D, Troupis T, Kontzoglou K, Eleftheriades M, Christopoulos P, et al. Tumor Markers and Their Diagnostic Significance in Ovarian Cancer. Life. 2023; 13(8): 1–18 doi: 10.3390/life13081689.

29.   Mujawar SA, Kurude VN, Gaikwad HA, Patil VW. Utility of ovarian tumour marker cancer antigen-125 and endocrine hormonal status in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2018; 12(10): BC01–3 doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2018/36048.12120.

30.   Spritzer PM, Marchesan LB, Fighera TM. Hirsutism, Normal Androgens and Diagnosis of PCOS. 2022;1–12 .

31.   Gu Y, Zhou G, Zhou F, Wu Q, Ma C, Zhang Y, et al. Life Modifications and PCOS: Old Story But New Tales. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; Apr 13; 13. doi: 10.3389/FENDO.2022.808898/FULL.

32.   Legro RS. Obesity and PCOS: Implications for Diagnosis and Treatment. Semin Reprod Med [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2024 Mar 10]; 30(6): 496. Available from: /pmc/articles/PMC3649566/

33.   Hoque A, Aziz R, Karmakar P, Hossain N, Hussain F, Uddin R. Relationship of Body Mass Index and Waist Hip Ratio with Insulin Resistance in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Patients. IAHS Med J. 2022; 4(2): 3–7 doi: 10.3329/iahsmj.v4i2.62514.

34.   Parker J. Pathophysiological Effects of Contemporary Lifestyle on Evolutionary-Conserved Survival Mechanisms in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Life. 2023; 13(4). doi: 10.3390/life13041056.

35.   Saha A, Gupta A Das. Evaluation of biochemical parameter in polycystic ovarian disease patients attending tertiary care hospital. Int J Reprod contraception, Obstet Gynecol [Internet]. 2022; Jan 28 [cited 2023 Dec 21]; 11(2): 496–496. Available from: https://typeset.io/papers/evaluation-of-biochemical-parameter-in-polycystic-ovarian-2of1uh5x

36.   Wang F, Dai W, Yang X hong, Guo Y hong, Sun Y pu. Analyses of optimal body mass index for infertile patients with either polycystic or non-polycystic ovary syndrome during assisted reproductive treatment in China. Nat Publ Gr [Internet]. 2016; (September): 1–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep34538

37.   Beydoun HA, Stadtmauer L, Beydoun MA, Russell H, Zhao Y, Oehninger S. Article Polycystic ovary syndrome , body mass index and outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies. Reprod Biomed Online [Internet]. 2009; 18(6): 856–63. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60037-5

38.   Yildiz BO, Bolour S, Woods K, Moore A, Azziz R. Visually scoring hirsutism. Hum Reprod Update. 2009; 16(1): 51–64 doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmp024.

39.   Fatsetti L, Gambera A, Andrico S, Sartori E. Acne and hirsutism in polycystic ovary syndrome: Clinical, endocrine-metabolic and ultrasonographic differences. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2002; 16(4): 275–84. doi: 10.1080/gye.16.4.275.284.

40.   Bardin CW, Lipsett MB. Testosterone and Androstenedione Blood Production Rates in Normal Women and Women withIdiopathic Hirsutism or Polycystic Ovaries *. 1967; 46(5): 891–902 doi: 10.1172/JCI105588.

41.   Smet M, McLennan A. Rotterdam criteria, the end. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2018; 21(2): 59–60. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12096.

42.   Azziz R, Carmina E, Dewailly D, Diamanti-Kandarakis E, Escobar-Morreale HF, Futterweit W, et al. The Androgen Excess and PCOS Society criteria for the polycystic ovary syndrome: the complete task force report. Vol. 91, Fertility and Sterility. 2009. 456–488. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.06.035.

43.   Ezat Hajmollarezaei. Total Testosterone Or Ultrasonographic Findings As a predictor For PCOS. Kufa Med J. 2023; 19(1): 51–8. doi: 10.36330/kmj.v19i1.11970.

44.   Shah S, Banu H, Sultana T, Akhtar N, Begum A, Zamila BM, et al. Increased ratio of total testosterone to dihydrotestosterone may predict an adverse metabolic outcome in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Endocrinol Metab. 2019; 9(6): 186–92. doi: 10.14740/jem.v9i6.601.

45.   Article R, Pateguana NB, Janes A, Dietary I, Program M. The contribution of hyperinsulinemia to the hyperandrogenism of polycystic ovary syndrome. :1–3.

46.   Escobar-morreale F, Milla LS. Abdominal adiposity and the polycystic ovary syndrome. 2007; 18(7). doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2007.07.003.

47.   Qu X, Donnelly R. Sex hormone-binding globulin (Shbg) as an early biomarker and therapeutic target in polycystic ovary syndrome. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(21): 1–17 doi: 10.3390/ijms21218191.

48.   Revathi R, Julius A. A biological effect of sex hormone binding globulin and testosterone in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) obese women. Res J Pharm Technol. 2017; Jul 1; 10(7): 2143–5. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00377.8.

49.   Atoum MF, Alajlouni MM, Alzoughool F. A Case-Control Study of the Luteinizing Hormone Level in Luteinizing Hormone Receptor Gene (rs2293275) Polymorphism in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Females. Public Health Genomics. 2022; 25(3): 89–97. doi: 10.1159/000521971.

50.   Revathi R, Julius A. Effect of LH/FSH ratio and its correlation with insulin resistance in PCOS obese woman of reproductive age group. Res J Pharm Technol. 2018; Jun 1; 11(6): 2217–9. doi: 10.1159/000521971.

51.   Burt CM, Beller JP, Abshire MY, Collins JS, Mccartney CR, Marshall JC. Neuroendocrine dysfunction in polycystic ovary syndrome. Steroids [Internet]. 2012; 77(4): 332–7. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2011.12.007

52.   Mccartney CR, Campbell RE. ScienceDirect Abnormal GnRH pulsatility in polycystic ovary syndrome : Recent insights. Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res [Internet]. 2020; 12: 78–84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coemr.2020.04.005

53.   Ruddenklau A, Campbell RE. Neuroendocrine Impairments of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. 2019; 160(July): 2230–42. doi: 10.1210/en.2019-00428.

54.   Marshall JC, Eagleson CA. Neuroendocrine aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1999; 28(2): 295–324. doi: 10.1016/S0889-8529(05)70071-2.

55.   Moore AM, Campbell RE. The neuroendocrine genesis of polycystic ovary syndrome: A role for arcuate nucleus GABA neurons. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol [Internet]. 2016; 160: 106–17. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2015.10.002

56.   Diamanti-kandarakis E, Kouli C, Tsianateli T, Bergiele A. Therapeutic effects of metformin on insulin resistance and hyperandrogenism in polycystic ovary syndrome. 1998; 269–74.

57.   Blank SK, Mccartney CR, Chhabra S, Helm KD, Eagleson CA, Chang RJ, et al. Modulation of Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Pulse Generator Sensitivity to Progesterone Inhibition in Hyperandrogenic Adolescent Girls — Implications for Regulation of Pubertal Maturation. 2015; 94(July 2009): 2360–6. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-2606.

58.   Shaaban Z, Khoradmehr A, Jafarzadeh Shirazi MR, Tamadon A. Pathophysiological mechanisms of gonadotropins- and steroid hormones-related genes in etiology of polycystic ovary syndrome. Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2019; 22(1): 3–16. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2018.31776.7646.

59.   Akinwunmi BO, Babic A, Vitonis AF, Cramer DW, Titus L, Tworoger SS, et al. Chronic medical conditions and CA125 levels among women without ovarian cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2018; 27(12): 1483–90. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0203.

60.   Id GF, Id WH, Id GA, Id EJC, Id BR, Id FMW. The diagnostic performance of CA125 for the detection of ovarian and non-ovarian cancer in primary care: A population-based cohort study. PLOS Medicine. 2020; 321: 1–18. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003295.

 

 

 

Received on 10.04.2024            Modified on 06.07.2024

Accepted on 11.09.2024           © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2024; 17(11):5445-5451.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00833