Serum Levels of Growth Differentiation Factor 15 as a Biomarker for Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

 

Uli Mas’uliyah Indarwati1,7, Puspa Wardhani2,5,6*, Muhamad Robi’ul Fuadi2,3,

Soebagijo Adi Soelistijo4

1Master Program of Basic Medical Science, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

2Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga,

Dr. Soetomo General Academic Teaching Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.

3Universitas Airlangga Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.

4Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga,

Dr. Soetomo General Academic Teaching Hospital, Surabaya, Indonesia.

5Institute of Tropical Disease, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

6Postgraduate School of Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia.

7Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences,

Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: puspa-w-2@fk.unair.ac.id

 

ABSTRACT:

Background: Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF-15) has been identified as a biomarker of cellular stress conditions and has demonstrated functional implications in kidney disease, metabolic disorders, and diabetes. However, the relationship between GDF-15 and the coexistence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the association between GDF-15 levels and the presence of CKD in patients with T2DM, then analyze the cut off value. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted, enrolling a total of 60 patients. T2DM patients were categorized into two groups based on the presence or absence of CKD. Serum GDF-15 levels were quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. Results: The study population (n=60) predominantly consisted of male individuals with an average age of 53 years. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.846 (95% CI = 0.748 – 0.945) with a statistically significant p-value of < 0.001. The optimal cut-off value for serum GDF-15 to detect the presence of CKD was determined as 362.80 pg/mL, with corresponding sensitivity and specificity values of 77% and 79%, respectively. Furthermore, a significant association between GDF-15 levels and both T2DM without CKD and T2DM with CKD was observed (p < 0.001). Conclusion: There is a significant association observed between serum GDF-15 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and the presence of CKD. The cut of value GDF-15 to detect the presence of CKD was determined as 362.80 pg/mL with sensitivity and specificity values of 77% and 79%, this is can be considered as a potential biomarker for the detection of CKD in individuals with T2DM.

 

KEYWORDS: GDF 15, CKD, DM, T2DM.

 

 


INTRODUCTION: 

The transforming growth factor-β superfamily encompasses growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15), an anti-inflammatory cytokine.1

 

Aside from its role as a responsive factor to cellular stress, GDF-15 has been implicated in kidney disease, metabolic disorders,2 and diabetes.3 Elevated levels of GDF-15 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have been associated with an increased risk of impaired kidney function.4 Chung et al. (2021) conducted a study that demonstrated an inverse relationship between GDF-15 levels and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR),5 indicating a higher GDF-15 level was associated with reduced kidney function. Furthermore, elevated GDF-15 levels have been linked to microvascular complications, specifically the development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM).6 Another study revealed elevated GDF-15 levels in patients with T2DM, suggesting GDF-15's potential as a biomarker for identifying individuals at risk for prediabetes.1 Ruszala et al. (2020) found that GDF-15 served as a predictor for the development of DM.7 Despite the available evidence in DM and CKD patient populations, research on GDF-15 in Indonesia remains limited. Therefore, further investigation into GDF-15 is warranted as data on GDF-15 in relation to diabetes and kidney disease in Indonesia are scarce.8

 

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disorder with a rising prevalence worldwide. According to the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) in 2019, DM accounted for 4.2 million deaths.9-12 Type 2 diabetes constitutes the majority of diabetes cases globally, with over 90% of incidence.13-16 CKD significantly contributes to the risk of end-stage renal disease in individuals with diabetes17 and is increasingly prevalent, leading to elevated mortality rates18 and imposing a substantial economic burden on healthcare systems.19

 

CKD is characterized by a decline in kidney function resulting in decreased glomerular filtration rate (GFR).20-23 Hemodynamic changes within renal tissue and impaired cellular function contribute to the reduced GFR, leading to elevated blood levels of GDF-155. Consequently, GDF-15 levels increase as a marker of cellular stress response,3 inflammation,24 and the presence of kidney and metabolic diseases.2

 

Understanding the differentiation of GDF-15 levels and their association with CKD incidence in patients with DM, particularly within the Indonesian population, remains unclear. Therefore, further research is necessary to investigate the role of GDF-15 as a potential biomarker and its relationship with CKD in patients with DM.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS:

Research Methods:

This study employed a cross-sectional design and was conducted at Universitas Airlangga Hospital between September 2022 and January 2023. The research protocol received ethical clearance from the institutional ethics committee of Universitas Airlangga Hospital, with approval number 082/KEP/2022. All data analyzed in this study were obtained from medical records, ensuring anonymity and confidentiality of the subjects involved.

 

Patient Enrollment:

The patients included in this study met the eligibility criteria of confirmed type 2 diabetes mellitus based on medical records and age ≥ 18 years and provided informed consent. Exclusions encompassed patients with tumors or receiving immunosuppressive drugs. The patients were categorized into CKD and Non-CKD groups based on renal function, determined by the doctor's diagnosis and medical record data. The CKD group encompassed stages G2-G5 or dialysis requirement, while the non-CKD group had eGFR ≥ 90 ml/minute/1.73 m2. Serum samples were stored at -40°C until transportation, and GDF-15 measurement using ELISA was conducted at the Laboratory of the Institute of Tropical Diseases, Universitas Airlangga.

 

Data Collection:

Relevant characteristics of the participants, including age, gender, smoking history, duration of diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension status, and body mass index (BMI), were systematically collected through a comprehensive review of medical record data and structured interviews conducted by trained personnel.

 

Materials:

Blood serum samples were utilized in this study for the measurement of Growth Differentiation Factor 15 (GDF-15). To quantify GDF-15 levels, a commercially available Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) kit (Elabscience) was employed, following the manufacturer's instructions precisely.

 

Statistical Analysis:

The demographic characteristics of the study participants were presented using descriptive statistics, summarized in the form of a table. Prior to analysis, the normality of the data was assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test (p > 0.05). Additionally, the homogeneity of variances was examined using Levene's test (p > 0.05). For normally distributed data, an independent sample t-test was employed. In cases where the data deviated from normality, the Mann-Whitney U test was utilized. To determine the optimal cut-off value and assess sensitivity and specificity, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. For categorical data, the chi-square test was employed to evaluate relationships. Statistical significance was established at a p-value ≤ 0.05. All statistical analyses were conducted using IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software, version 26.0.

 

RESULTS:

The demographic characteristics of the study population, consisting of 60 individuals, are presented in Table 1. The average age of the patients was determined to be 53.43±9.21 years. Among the study participants, 34 individuals (56.7%) were identified as female, while 26 individuals (43.3%) were identified as male.


Table 1: Characteristics of the Study Population

 

Total

Group

p-value

DM non-CKD

DM-CKD

n

60

29

31

 

Age e

53.43±9.21

51.34± 9.42

55.38 ± 8.69

0.089c

Gender, n(%)

Male

Female

 

34 (56.7)

26 (43.3)

 

17 (50.0)

12 (46.2)

 

17 (50.0)

14 (53.8)

 

0.972b

Smoking

11 (18.3)

7 (23.3)

 4 (13.3)

0.429b

DM duration

< 5 years

5-10 years

> 10 years

 

24 (40)

23 (38.3)

13 (21.7)

 

13 (54.2)

8 (34.8)

8 (61.5)

 

11 (45.8)

15 (65.2)

5 (38.5)

0.232b

BMIc

24.26 ± 2.49

24.13 ± 2.55

24.38 ± 2.46

0.693c

Hypertension, n(%)

26 (43.3)

11 (42.3)

15 (57.7)

0.578b

eGFR

80 (3-170)

101 (90-170)

38 (3-86)

0.000a*

Creatinine

0.99 (0.19-14.35)

0.79 (0.19-0.95)

1.7(0.81-14.35)

0.000a*

d Median (min-max), e Mean ± SD, a Mann Whitney, b Chi-Square, c Independent T- test, *significant p < 0.05

 

 


Figure 1: ROC analysis of GDF 15 levels in predicting CKD in individuals with diabetes

 

AUC = 0.846 (p = <0.001); (95% CI: 0.748–0.945); identification of cut-off = 362.80 pg/mL; Sensitivity = 77% dan specificity = 79% (Figure 1). ROC = receiver operating characteristic; AUC = area under the curve; CI = Confidence Interval.

 

In the DM non-CKD group, the maximum recorded GDF-15 value was 544.95 pg/mL, whereas in the CKD group, it reached 1896.76 pg/mL. Conversely, the minimum values were observed as 61.68 pg/mL and 118.15 pg/mL, respectively. The obtained p-value of <0.001 (Table 2) indicates a significant association between GDF-15 levels and the differentiation of DM non-CKD and DM-CKD groups.

 

Table 2: Association GDF 15 with DM non-CKD and DM-CKD

 

Median (minimum-maxsimum)

(pg/mL)

P-value

DM-Non CKD

231.35 (61.68 – 544.95)

<0.001*

DM-CKD

514.92 (118.15 – 1896.76)

 

DISCUSSION:

The present study demonstrates a significant difference in GDF-15 levels between the DM non-CKD and DM-CKD groups (p < 0.001), indicating that the DM-CKD group exhibits significantly higher GDF-15 levels compared to the DM non-CKD group. These findings corroborate previous research, which also reported elevated GDF-15 levels in diabetic kidney disease patients compared to diabetic patients without kidney disease.25

 

Elevated levels of GDF-15 have also been observed in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, suggesting its potential as a biomarker for identifying individuals with prediabetes.1 The expression of GDF-15 increases with disease progression, and it is associated with factors such as age, BMI, insulin resistance, and the development of type 2 diabetes. GDF-15 is released by various cell types, including macrophages, cardiomyocytes, and adipocytes, particularly under stressful conditions.26

 

The average GDF-15 value was found to be higher in the CKD group, with a median value of 231.35 pg/mL in the non-CKD DM group and an average of 514.92 pg/mL in the DM-CKD group. Increased GDF-15 levels are associated with chronic inflammation, oxidative stress, and tissue injury, which may reflect kidney disorders.27 Moreover, the upregulation of GDF-15 expression in the early stages of kidney injury is believed to serve a protective role against tissue damage and, consequently, serves as a predictor of tissue injury28. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the precise underlying mechanisms.

 

Additionally, it has been noted that GDF-15 levels are lower in type 2 diabetes patients with normal kidney function and without heart disease, while they are higher in patients with decreased kidney function. Furthermore, elevated GDF-15 levels have been identified as a risk marker for renal endpoints.4 Elevated levels of GDF-15 in the bloodstream, as observed in previous research, have been found to be associated with factors such as age, muscle performance, and heightened inflammation. Notably, a previous study demonstrated that plasma levels of GDF-15 tend to increase with age and exhibit an inverse correlation with an active lifestyle. Specifically, among individuals of different age groups, circulating GDF-15 was notably higher in sedentary patients, while significantly lower levels were observed in physically active individuals, such as cyclists.29

 

The increased in GDF 15 is also influenced by several conditions, including smoking, increasing age, diabetes mellitus, low eGFR, anemia30, and sepsis31. The GDF value of 15 increases in smokers and ex-smokers, with a higher average value shown in former smokers30, diabetic retinopathy5, endometriosisis severity32,cancer, heart disease, as well as chronic liver disease33.

 

The current study reveals significantly elevated GDF-15 levels in DM-CKD patients compared to DM non-CKD patients. CKD, as one of the microvascular complications in diabetes mellitus, triggers the interaction of mediators produced by endothelial cells, resulting in endothelial dysfunction and imbalanced intracellular mechanisms.34,35 It is worth mentioning that GDF-15 is predominantly secreted by endothelial cells, and elevated serum levels of GDF-15 are indicative of endothelial and microvascular damage.36

 

GDF-15, also known as Macrophage Inhibiting Cytokine 1 (MIC-1), belongs to the Transforming Growth Factor (TGF-β) superfamily. Although the exact function of GDF-15 remains to be fully understood, it plays a crucial role in regulating cell growth, apoptosis, and inflammatory activation. GDF-15 exhibits both anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory signaling properties in various cardiovascular complications.26,37

 

The cut-off analysis was conducted to determine the optimal threshold for the identification of chronic kidney disease (CKD), while the sensitivity and specificity measures were employed to assess the potential of GDF-15 as a biomarker. Based on the analysis outcomes, the determined cut-off value for predicting CKD was 362.80 pg/mL, accompanied by a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 79%. These sensitivity and specificity values align with those reported in a prior study that investigated GDF-15 in CKD and non-CKD cohorts, demonstrating a sensitivity of 76.5% and a specificity of 76.0%.27

 

One limitation of this study is the existence of several other factors that may influence the decrease of GDF-15 levels in DM-CKD and the increase in GDF-15 levels in DM non-CKD. These factors were not included in the exclusion criteria, which may have impacted the observed results.

 

CONCLUSION:

There is a significant association observed between serum GDF-15 levels in patients with DM and the presence of CKD. Specifically, GDF-15 levels were found to be elevated in patients with CKD complication. The cut of value GDF-15 to detect the presence of CKD was determined as 362.80 pg/mL with sensitivity and specificity values of 77% and 79%. These findings suggest that GDF-15 holds potential as a biomarker for the detection of CKD in patients with DM.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

All the authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:

We would like to express our sincere gratitude to the staff at the study site and the participants who generously agreed to take part in this study. We would also like to extend our appreciation to Universitas Airlangga Hospital and the Institute of Tropical Disease at Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, for providing the necessary facilities for conducting this study. Furthermore, we acknowledge the funding support received from the National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN) Indonesia under the Research Assistance for Research and Innovation Talents program.

 

REFERENCES:

1.      Bao X, Borné Y, Muhammad IF, et al. Growth differentiation factor 15 is positively associated with incidence of diabetes mellitus: the Malmö Diet and Cancer–Cardiovascular Cohort. Diabetologia. 2019; 62(1): 78-86. doi:10.1007/s00125-018-4751-7

2.      Emmerson PJ, Duffin KL, Chintharlapalli S, Wu X. GDF15 and Growth Control. Front Physiol. 2018; 9: 1-7. doi:10.3389/fphys.2018.01712

3.      Rochette L, Zeller M, Cottin Y, Vergely C. Insights Into Mechanisms of GDF15 and Receptor GFRAL: Therapeutic Targets. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2020;31(12):939-951. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2020.10.004

4.      Frimodt-Møller M, Von Scholten BJ, Reinhard H, et al. Growth differentiation factor-15 and fibroblast growth factor-23 are associated with mortality in type 2 diabetes – An observational follow-up study. PLoS One. 2018; 13(4): 1-13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0196634

5.      Chung JO, Chung MY, Park SY, Cho DH, Chung DJ. Relationship between plasma growth differentiation factor-15 level and estimated glomerular filtration rate in type 2 diabetes patients with and without albuminuria. J Diabetes Complications. 2021;35(4):107849. doi:10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2021.107849

6.      Carlsson AC, Nowak C, Lind L, et al. Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF-15) is a potential biomarker of both diabetic kidney disease and future cardiovascular events in cohorts of individuals with type 2 diabetes: a proteomics approach. Ups J Med Sci. 2020; 125(1): 37-43. doi:10.1080/03009734.2019.1696430

7.      Ruszała M, Niebrzydowska M, Pilszyk A, Kimber-Trojnar Ż, Trojnar M, Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B. Novel biomolecules in the pathogenesis of gestational diabetes mellitus. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(21). doi:10.3390/ijms222111578

8.      Lukaszyk E, Lukaszyk M, Koc-Zorawska E, Bodzenta-Lukaszyk A, Malyszko J. GDF-15, iron, and inflammation in early chronic kidney disease among elderly patients. Int Urol Nephrol. 2016; 48(6): 839-844. doi:10.1007/s11255-016-1278-z

9.      Abdurachman A, Rubiyanto A, Suhariningsih S, Hendromartono H, Gunawan A. The optimal dose of the Low-level laser therapy in the treatment of type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Bali Med J. 2018; 7(1): 7-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v7i1.527

10.   Trisnadewi NW, Adiputra IMS, Oktaviani NPW, Suapriyanti PA, Intan Saraswati NLG. Correlation between stress level and family support towards fasting and postprandial glucose level in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Bali Med J. 2020; 9(3): 811-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v9i3.2006

11.   Al-Rubaye AAH. The Correlation between Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension in Iraqi Patients. J. Med. Chem. Sci., 2023; 6(4): 778-788. https://doi.org/10.26655/JMCHEMSCI.2023.4.9

12.   Al-Obaidi MJ, Al-Ghurabi BH. Potential Role of NLRP3 Inflammasome Activation in the Pathogenesis of Periodontitis Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J. Med. Chem. Sci., 2023; 6(3): 522-531. https://doi.org/10.26655/JMCHEMSCI.2023.3.9

13.   IDF. 537 Million People Worldwide Have Diabetes. 10th editi.; 2021. https://diabetesatlas.org

14.   Dhenok Palupi F, Wasita B, Patriadi Nuhriawangsa AM. The potency of Centella asiatica in protecting organs of rats with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Bali Med J. 2019; 8(1): 316-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v8i1.1229

15.   Dwipayanti NMA, Nariata IW, Aryana IGPS. Diabetes mellitus control among elderly patients at geriatric polyclinic of Karangasem District Hospital, Bali, Indonesia: a preliminary study. Bali Med J. 2020; 9(1): 279-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v9i1.1664

16.   Kashtl GJ, Abed BA, Farhan LO, Salman IN, Dawood AS. A Comparative Study to Determine LDH Enzyme Levels in Serum Samples of Women with Breast Cancer and Women with Breast Cancer and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J. Med. Chem. Sci., 2023; 6(4): 883-890. https://doi.org/10.26655/JMCHEMSCI.2023.4.20

17.   Samsu N. Diabetic Nephropathy: Challenges in Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021. doi:10.1155/2021/1497449

18.   Lousa I, Reis F, Beirão I, Alves R, Belo L, Santos-Silva A. New potential biomarkers for chronic kidney disease management — A review of the literature. Int J Mol Sci. 2021; 22(1): 1-37. doi:10.3390/ijms22010043

19.   ADA. Standards of medical care in diabetes—2020 abridged for primary care providers. Clin Diabetes. 2020; 38(1): 10-38. doi:10.2337/cd20-as01

20.   Selby NM, Taal MW. An updated overview of diabetic nephropathy: Diagnosis, prognosis, treatment goals and latest guidelines. Diabetes, Obes Metab. 2020; 22(S1): 3-15. doi:10.1111/dom.14007

21.   Handoko E, Dyah I, Utomo SP, Apriannisa A. Correlation between Otic Capsule Density and Serum 25(OH)D with hearing threshold in chronic kidney disease. Bali Med J. 2017; 6(2): 436-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v6i2.560

22.   Rusyati LMM, Kandarin Y, Priliawati NNT. High serum interleukin-2 levels are associated with pruritus in chronic kidney disease undergoing regular hemodialysis. Bali Med J. 2020; 9(3): 672-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15562/bmj.v9i3.2018

23.   Mohamed HS, Alhabibi AM, Donia AAE, Elsawy GM, Ibrahim NR, Mohamed MA. Expression of MicroRNA-155-5p in Chronic Kidney Disease As a Potential Marker of Cardiovascular Complications. J. Med. Chem. Sci., 2023; 6(8): 1737-1745. https://doi.org/10.26655/JMCHEMSCI.2023.8.3

24.   Wischhusen J, Melero I, Fridman WH. Growth/Differentiation Factor-15 (GDF-15): From Biomarker to Novel Targetable Immune Checkpoint. Front Immunol. 2020; 11. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.00951

25.   Hussain S, Habib A, Hussain MS, Najmi AK. Potential biomarkers for early detection of diabetic kidney disease. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2020; 161: 108082. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108082

26.   Shin MY, Kim JM, Kang YE, et al. Association between growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) and cardiovascular risk in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Korean Med Sci. 2016; 31(9): 1413-1418. doi:10.3346/jkms.2016.31.9.1413

27.   Kim JS, Kim S, Won CW, Jeong KH. Association between plasma levels of growth differentiation factor-15 and renal function in the elderly: Korean frailty and aging cohort study. Kidney Blood Press Res. 2019; 44(3): 405-414. doi:10.1159/000498959

28.   Kim Y, Noren Hooten N, Evans MK. CRP stimulates GDF15 expression in endothelial cells through p53. Mediators Inflamm. 2018; 2018. doi:10.1155/2018/8278039

29.   Conte M, Martucci M, Mosconi G, et al. GDF15 Plasma Level Is Inversely Associated With Level of Physical Activity and Correlates With Markers of Inflammation and Muscle Weakness. Front Immunol. 2020; 11: 1-10. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.00915

30.   Wada H, Suzuki M, Matsuda M, et al. Impact of smoking status on growth differentiation factor 15 and mortality in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: The anox study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020; 9(22): 1-12. doi:10.1161/JAHA.120.018217

31.   Buendgens L, Yagmur E, Bruensing J, et al. Growth Differentiation Factor-15 Is a Predictor of Mortality in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis. Dis Markers. 2017; 2017. doi:10.1155/2017/5271203

32.   Santoso B, Rahmawati NY, Sa’adi A, et al. Elevated peritoneal soluble endoglin and GDF-15 in infertile women with severe endometriosis and pelvic adhesion. J Reprod Immunol. 2021; 146: 103343. doi:10.1016/j.jri.2021.103343

33.   Xiao QA, He Q, Zeng J, Xia X. GDF-15, a future therapeutic target of glucolipid metabolic disorders and cardiovascular disease. Biomed Pharmacother. 2022;146(October 2021):112582. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112582

34.   Uwaezuoke SN. The role of novel biomarkers in predicting diabetic nephropathy: A review. Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis. 2017; 10: 221-231. doi:10.2147/IJNRD.S143186

35.   Lin YC, Chang YH, Yang SY, Wu KD, Chu TS. Update of pathophysiology and management of diabetic kidney disease. J Formos Med Assoc. 2018; 117(8): 662-675. doi:10.1016/j.jfma.2018.02.007

36.   Niu Y, Zhang W, Shi J, et al. The Relationship Between Circulating Growth Differentiation Factor 15 Levels and Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021; 12: 1-8. doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.627395

37.   Babalghith AO, Al-kuraishy HM, Al-Gareeb AI, et al. The Potential Role of Growth Differentiation Factor 15 in COVID-19: A Corollary Subjective Effect or Not? Diagnostics. 2022; 12(9). doi:10.3390/diagnostics12092051

 

 

 

 

 

Received on 16.03.2023            Modified on 12.05.2023

Accepted on 28.06.2023           © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2024; 17(3):1262-1266.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00197