Author(s):
Sultan Muhammad Salahudeen, Muhammad Hasan, Muzibunnisa Begam Abdul Hathi, Hiba Sultan, Jasimudeen Sulaiman, Mohammad Gousuddin, Avanapu Srinivasa Rao
Email(s):
lincolnsultan@gmail.com
DOI:
10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00608 
Address:
Sultan Muhammad Salahudeen*1, Muhammad Hasan2, Muzibunnisa Begam Abdul Hathi3, Hiba Sultan4, Jasimudeen Sulaiman5, Mohammad Gousuddin6, Avanapu Srinivasa Rao7
1Faculty of Pharmacy, Lincoln University, Malaysia.
2School of Medicine, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
3Kidsheart Medical Centre, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
4Department of Chemistry, University of Leeds, United Kingdom.
5St, Stephens College, Kerala, India.
6Faculty of Pharmacy, Lincoln University, Malaysia.
7Bhaskar Pharmacy College, Hyderabad, India.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 18,
Issue - 9,
Year - 2025
ABSTRACT:
The pharmacy profession has evolved globally from traditional product-focused roles to patient-centred healthcare services. In India, while pharmacy education has made strides in various sectors, patient-oriented services remain insufficient, highlighting the need for competency-based education (CBE) aligned with international standards. To investigate stakeholder perspectives on competency-based pharmacy education in Southern India and understand barriers to implementation, with specific focus on the International Pharmaceutical Federation (FIP) developmental goal number 5 regarding competency development. An exploratory cross-sectional qualitative survey was conducted among pharmacy professionals across various sectors. Data was collected through web-linked open-ended questionnaires distributed via email, using purposeful and snowball sampling. Thematic analysis was employed following FIP Goal 5 framework, incorporating both deductive and inductive approaches. The study included 28 participants from diverse pharmacy sectors, with 57.1% male and 42.9% female respondents. Key themes emerged around workforce development, practice enhancement, and scientific advancement. Stakeholders identified critical gaps in current pharmacy education, including insufficient practical training, limited industry exposure, and outdated curriculum designs. The findings highlighted the need for integrating modern technologies, enhancing clinical training, and developing structured assessment tools. Participants emphasized the importance of balancing theoretical knowledge with practical applications and suggested implementing a comprehensive wellness program for pharmacy professionals. The study reveals significant opportunities for reforming pharmacy education in India to meet global standards while addressing local healthcare needs. Recommendations include curriculum modernization, increased industry collaboration, and enhanced practical training. Implementation challenges identified include time constraints, insufficient trained staff, lack of public awareness, and regulatory barriers. These findings provide valuable insights for educational institutions and policymakers in developing a robust, competency-based pharmacy education system in India.
Cite this article:
Sultan Muhammad Salahudeen, Muhammad Hasan, Muzibunnisa Begam Abdul Hathi, Hiba Sultan, Jasimudeen Sulaiman, Mohammad Gousuddin, Avanapu Srinivasa Rao. Stakeholder’s Perspectives on Competency Based Pharmacy Education Development in India: Current Status and Future directions. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2025;18(9):4232-0. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00608
Cite(Electronic):
Sultan Muhammad Salahudeen, Muhammad Hasan, Muzibunnisa Begam Abdul Hathi, Hiba Sultan, Jasimudeen Sulaiman, Mohammad Gousuddin, Avanapu Srinivasa Rao. Stakeholder’s Perspectives on Competency Based Pharmacy Education Development in India: Current Status and Future directions. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2025;18(9):4232-0. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00608 Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2025-18-9-28
REFERENCES:
1. FIP-International Pharmaceutical Federation. ‘Statement of policy on good pharmacy education practice.’ The Hague: FIP; 2000. https://www.fip.org/file/1518. on...April2024
2. Shah N, et al. Competency-based medical education: An overview and application in pharmacology. Indian J Pharmacol. 2016;48:S5-9
3. NCVER: Employability, skills for the future. VOCED Plus International tertiary education research database 2002; Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra. Available from: http://hdl.voced.edu.au/10707/62282. pp1-74.
4. Medina, M.S. et al. Center for the Advancement of Pharmacy Education2013 Educational Outcomes. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2013; 77: 162. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
5. David Guile and Farah Ahamed. Modernising the Pharmacy Curriculum. LLAKES Research Paper 26 Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies. www.llakes.org.uk
6. Growth of pharmacy education in India from 1932 to 2007 [Internet]. [cited 2022 Apr 14]. Available from: http://test.pharmabiz.com/special features/growth-of-pharmacy-education-in-india-from-1932-to-2007-44185
7. The FIP Development Goals Report 2021: Setting goals for the decade ahead. (https://developmentgoals.fip.org/global-report-2021/ )) Accessed on 21st Feb 2024.
8. Sharon Susan Raj, et al. Modern pharmaceutical education and its root in India. International Journal of Research and Review. 2023; 10(2): 705-713. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20230286
9. Frenk, J., et al., Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. The Lancet, 2010;376:1923-1958.
10. Draft: National Pharmacy commission Bill. Nov, 2023,
11. https://main.mohfw.gov.in/sites/default/files/Public%20notice%20Draft%20National%20Pharmacy%20Commission%20Bill.pdf Accessed on 28th October 2024.
12. Thomas SL, et al. Methodological and practical guidance for designing and conducting online qualitative surveys in public health. Health Promot Int. 2024; 39(3): daae061. doi:10.1093/heapro/daae061
13. Braun V, et al. The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2021; 24(6): 641-54.
14. Rahimi S, Khatooni M. Saturation in qualitative research: An evolutionary concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024;6:100174. Published 2024 Jan 5. doi:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100174.
15. Suter, W. N. 2012. “Chapter 12: Qualitative Data, Analysis, and Design.” In Introduction to Educational Research: A Critical Thinking Approach, 2nd ed., 342–86. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384443.n12.
16. Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE Guide No. 131. Med Teach. 2020; 42(8): 846–854. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030.
17. Delve, Ho, L., and Limpaecher, A. (2024, March 01). Inductive Thematic Analysis and Deductive Thematic Analysis in Qualitative Research https://delvetool.com/blog/inductive-deductive-thematic-analysis
18. Bajis, D., et al.. Stakeholders' perspectives on quality assurance of pharmacy education in the eastern Mediterranean region. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2018; 82(10), 6482.
19. Bertilsson, E. Stakeholder role in setting curriculum priorities for expanding pharmacy scope of practice. Pharmacy Education. 203; 23(1): 640-647.
20. Patil, P. (2010). Recent Trends in Pharmacy Education and Practice. Conference Address.
21. Atkinson J., et al. The Second Round of the PHAR-QA Survey of Competences for Pharmacy Practice. Pharmacy (Basel). 2016; 4(3): 27. Published 2016 Sep 21. doi:10.3390/pharmacy4030027.
22. Palak Sharma et al, .A Review on Pharmacist Impact on patient safety. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. Tech. 2024; 14(1): 87-4 doi: 10.52711/2231-5713.2024.00016.
23. Winch, C., and Clarke, L. Front-loaded Vocational Education versus Lifelong Learning. Oxford Review of Education, 2004; 29(2): 239-252.
24. Durand C.et al. Contributions and challenges of community pharmacists during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. J Pharm Policy Pract. 2022; 16; 15(1): 43. doi: 10.1186/s40545-022-00438-8. PMID: 35710392; PMCID: PMC9202330.
25. Önen Bayram FE, Köksal M. A Quantitative Curriculum Mapping of the Faculty of Pharmacy of Yeditepe University, Turkey: A Process to Assess the Consistency of a Curriculum with the Mission and Vision of an Institution and National Requirements. Pharmacy (Basel). 2019; 1; 7(3): 78. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy7030078. PMID: 31266147; PMCID: PMC6789817.
26. Balakrishnan, A., et al. Training needs assessment for employability in pharmaceutical industries. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2020; 8: 239-244.
27. Martin, L., et al. Health informatics competencies for pharmacists in training. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. 2019; 83(2): 6512.
28. Shah, N. V., et al. Advances in Hospital Pharmacy. Research J. Pharm. and Tech., 2017; 10(2): 618-624. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00120.2
29. Mor N. et al. The pharmacy as a primary care provider. Front Public Health. 2023;11:1221439. Published 2023; 24. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1221439
30. Laila Ali Layqah, Yousif S. Alakeel, Jinan Z. Shamou. The Practice of Counseling in Pharmacy: Patients’ Perspectives. Asian J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2018; 8(3):170-176.
31. Mossialos, E., et al. From "retailers" to health care providers: transforming the role of community pharmacists in chronic disease management. Health Policy. 2015; 119(5): 628-639.
32. Sabde YD.et al. Mapping private pharmacies and their characteristics in Ujjain district, Central India. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011; 11: 351. 2011; 28. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-351,
33. Porselvi, A. A Review on the Need of Advanced Clinical Pharmacy Education Services for Diabetes Prevention and Management in India. Research J. Pharm. and Tech., 2021; 14(1): 493-500.
34. Bingham JM, Axon DR. Telehealth Integration into Pharmacy Practice Curricula: An Exploratory Survey of Faculty Perception. Pharmacy (Basel). 2023; 11(4): 110. 2023; 30. doi:10.3390/pharmacy11040110
35. Deshmukh, P., Paliwal, S. Pharmacy education 2.0 with special reference to digital India. Multidisciplinary Reviews. 2024; 7(4): 2024065. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.20240655713.2023.00041.
36. Syed-Abdul MM. et al. Role of Nutrition Education in Pharmacy Curriculum-Students' Perspectives and Attitudes. Pharmacy (Basel). 2021; 9(1): 26. 2021: 23. doi:10.3390/pharmacy9010026
37. Ameena Samreen et al., An Overview of Various Subjects Included as Syllabus for B. Pharmacy Students by JNTUH for its Definitions, Significance, Objectives and Outcomes. Asian J. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2017; 7(1): 38-48.
38. Bora, S.J., et al. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacy. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 13(3): 229-4.
39. Ameri A, et al. Investigating Pharmacists' Views on Telepharmacy: Prioritizing Key Relationships, Barriers, and Benefits. J Pharm Technol. 2020; 36(5): 171-178. doi:10.1177/8755122520931442.
40. Jessy Jauza, Muhammad Thesa Ghozali. Professional competence and Perception on the Practical Implementation of Telepharmacy among Pharmacists – A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(6): 2915-4.
41. Noble, C., et al. Making the Transition from Pharmacy Student to Pharmacist. Int J Pharm Pract. 2015; 23(4): 292-304.
42. Burrows. J., et al. (). We are all patient-centred now, aren't we? Lessons from new pharmacy graduates. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning. 2020; 12(5): 508-516.
43. Rajiah, K., et al. Students as partners: how the student-centred active learning concept may help Indian pharmacy education. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research. 2022; 56(4): 620-626.
44. Rajesh Kumar Sharma, Mark H. Gulela. Problem Based Learning in Nursing: A New Approach of Active Learning. Int. J. Nur. Edu. and Research. 2014; 2(1): 16-18.
45. Shivhare, S. C., et al. Indian Pharmaceutical Education and its Regulatory Authorities. Research J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech., 2012; 4(1): 14-18.
46. Surwade, K. S., et al. A Review of NBA’s Accreditation Criteria for Programmes in Pharmacy. Res. J. Pharma. Dosage Forms and Tech., 2019; 11(1): 35-38. doi: 10.5958/0975-4377.2019.00005.3.
47. Pol, R., et al. Current pharmacy curriculum in India and need for an update. International Journal of Life-Sciences Scientific Research. 2017; 3(6): 1459-1461.