Author(s): Preethi Mahalingaswamy, Venkatalakshmi Ranganathan, Sasikala Chinnappan

Email(s): venkatalakshmi@crescent.education

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00203   

Address: Preethi Mahalingaswamy1, Venkatalakshmi Ranganathan2*, Sasikala Chinnappan3
1Department of Pharmaceutics, Crescent School of Pharmacy, B.S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai - 600048, India.
2Department of Pharmaceutics, Crescent School of Pharmacy, B.S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and Technology, Chennai - 600048, India.
3Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, UCSI University, Taman Connaught, 56000 Cheras, Malaysia.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 19,      Issue - 3,     Year - 2026


ABSTRACT:
By increasing productivity, cutting expenses, and shortening turnaround times, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) to drug discovery and development has completely transformed pharmaceutical research. From early target identification and lead discovery to clinical validation and the emergence of personalized medicine, this study examines the changing importance of machine learning across the drug development pipeline. In order to find molecular targets, optimize lead compounds, and anticipate toxicity profiles, traditional computational techniques like support vector machines, decision forests, and more contemporary deep learning architectures are increasingly essential. These intelligent systems are transforming the traditional drug development paradigm, enabling enhanced screening of vast chemical libraries, improved molecular interaction prediction, and increased clinical trial success rates. Additionally, specific uses of machine learning in illness-specific settings, such as Alzheimer's disease, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disorders are mentioned. ML has made it easier to create customized therapies and innovative risk assessment methods, such as phenomapping, in cardiovascular medicine. Data-driven methods are improving patient management and diagnostics in diabetes care, while explainable AI is tackling decision-making transparency. ML algorithms that examine MRI data and biomarker patterns are speeding up early diagnosis for neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's, allowing for prompt therapies. This paper emphasizes how machine learning (ML) can revolutionize precision medicine and generic drug discovery by enabling more patient-specific and data-informed therapeutic actions.


Cite this article:
Preethi Mahalingaswamy, Venkatalakshmi Ranganathan, Sasikala Chinnappan. An Overview of Role of Machine Learning in Drug Discovery. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(3):1409-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00203

Cite(Electronic):
Preethi Mahalingaswamy, Venkatalakshmi Ranganathan, Sasikala Chinnappan. An Overview of Role of Machine Learning in Drug Discovery. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(3):1409-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00203   Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2026-19-3-64


REFERENCE:
1.    Joachims, T.; Radlinski, F. Search Engines that Learn from Implicit Feedback. Computer 2007, 40, 34–40. 
2.    Morgan, S.; Grootendorst, P.; Lexchin, J.; Cunningham, C.; Greyson, D. The cost of drug development: A systematic review. Health Policy 2011, 100, 4–17. 
3.    Ng, H.W.; Shu, M.; Luo, H.; Ye, H.; Ge, W.; Perkins, R.; Tong, W.; Hong, H. Estrogenic activity data extraction and in silico prediction show the endocrine disruption potential of bisphenol A replacement compounds. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2015, 28, 1784–1795. 
4.    B.Suay-Garcia, J.I.Bueso-Bordils, A.Falcó, M.T. Pérez-Gracia, G. Antón-Fos, P. Alemán-López, Quantitative structure-activity relationship methods in the discovery and development of antibacterials, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science e1472
5.    Saeys Y, Inza I, Larrañaga P. A review of feature selection techniques in bioinformatics. Bioinformatics 2007; 23(19): 2507–17.
6.    Grammatica P., Sangion A. A historical excursus on the statistical validation parameters for qsar models: a clarification concerning metrics and terminology. J Chem Inform Modeling 2016; 56(6): 1127–31.
7.    Gaudelet, T., Day, B., Jamasb, A. R., Soman, J., Regep, C., Liu, G., . Tang, J. Utilizing graph machine learning within drug discovery and development. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2021; 22(6):bbab159.
8.    Carracedo-Reboredo, P., Liñares-Blanco, J., Rodríguez-Fernández, N., Cedrón, F., Novoa, F. J., Carballal, A., Fernandez-Lozano, C. A review on machine learning approaches and trends in drug discovery. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 2021; 19: 4538-4558.
9.    Patel, L., Shukla, T., Huang, X., Ussery, D. W., and Wang, S. (2020). Machine learning methods in drug discovery. Molecules, 25(22), 5277.
10.    Réda, C., Kaufmann, E., and Delahaye-Duriez, A. Machine learning applications in drug development. Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal. 2020; 18: 241-252.
11.    Đorđević, S., Gonzalez, M. M., Conejos-Sánchez, I., Carreira, B., Pozzi, S., Acúrcio, R. C.,. Vicent, M. J. Current hurdles to the translation of nanomedicines from bench to the clinic. Drug Delivery and Translational Research. 2022: 1-26.
12.    Sarkar, C., Das, B., Rawat, V. S., Wahlang, J. B., Nongpiur, A., Tiewsoh, I., .. Sony, H. T. Artificial intelligence and machine learning technology driven modern drug discovery and development. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2023; 24(3): 2026.
13.    Kalinin AA, Higgins GA, Reamaroon N, et al. Deep learning in pharmacogenomics: from gene regulation to patient stratification. Pharmacogenomics. 2018; 19: 629-650.
14.    Cavallari LH, Weitzel K. Pharmacogenomics in cardiology—genetics and drug response: 10 years of progress. Future Cardiol. 2015; 11: 281-286.
15.    Sibbing D, Aradi D, Alexopoulos D, et al. Updated expert consensus statement on platelet function and genetic testing for guiding P2Y12 receptor inhibitor treatment in percutaneous coronary intervention. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019; 12: 1521-1537.
16.    Kitzmiller JP, Mikulik EB, Dauki AM, Murkherjee C, Luzum JA. Pharmacogenomics of statins: understanding susceptibility to adverse effects. Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2016; 9: 97-106.
17.    Pirmohamed M, Burnside G, Eriksson N, et al. A randomized trial of genotypeguided dosing of warfarin. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 2294-2303.
18.    Syn NL, Wong AL, Lee SC, et al. Genotype-guided versus traditional clinical dosing of warfarin in patients of Asian ancestry: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2018; 16: 104.
19.    Shah SJ. Precision medicine for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: an overview. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2017; 10: 233-244.
20.    Shameer K, Johnson KW, Glicksberg BS, Dudley JT, Sengupta PP. Machine learning in cardiovascular medicine: are we there yet? Heart. 2018; 104: 1156-1164.
21.    M.U. Saleem, M. Aslam, A. Akgül, M. Farman, R. Bibi, Controllability of PDEs model for type 1 diabetes, Math. Methods Appl. Sci. 2022; 45(15): 8800–8808.
22.    M. Farman, A. Akgül, A. Ahmad, Analysis and simulation of fractional-order diabetes model, Adv. Theory Nonlinear Anal. Appl. 2020; 4(4): 483–497.
23.    B.A. Goldstein, A.M. Navar, M.J. Pencina, J.P.A. Ioannidis, Opportunities and challenges in developing risk prediction models with electronic health records data: a systematic review, J. Am. Med. Inf. Assoc. 2016; 24(1): 198–208, https:// doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocw042.
24.    Sivakani GA, Ansari R. Machine learning framework for implementing Alzheimer’s disease. Int Conferen Commun Signal Process. (2020) 12: 588– 92. doi:10.1109/ICCSP48568.2020.9182220
25.    Khan P, Kader MF, Islam SR, Rahman AB, Kamal MS, Toha MU, et al. Machine learning and deep learning approaches for brain disease diagnosis: principles and recent advances. IEEE Access. 2021; 9: 37622–55. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3062484
26.    Reddy GT, Reddy MP, Lakshmanna K, Rajput DS, Kaluri R, Srivastava G. Hybrid genetic algorithm and a fuzzy logic classifier for heart disease diagnosis. Evol Intel. 2020; 13: 185–96. doi: 10.1007/s12065-019-00327-1
27.    Abdulsahib GM, Khalaf OI. Accurate and effective data collection with minimum energy path selection in wireless sensor networks using mobile sinks. J Informat Technol Manage. (2020) 13:139–53
28.    Gadekallu TR, Khare N, Bhattacharya S, Singh S, Maddikunta PK, Srivastava G. Deep neural networks to predict diabetic retinopathy. J Ambient Intell Human Computing. 2020; 21:1–4. doi: 10.1007/s12652-020-01963-7
29.    Salman AD, Khalaf OI, Abdulsahib GM. An adaptive intelligent alarm system for wireless sensor network. Indonesian J Electric Eng Comput Sci. 2019; 15: 142–7. doi:10.11591/ijeecs.v15.i1.pp142-147
30.    Srinivasu PN, Bhoi AK, Jhaveri RH, Reddy GT, Bilal M. Probabilistic Deep Q Network for real-time path planning in censorious robotic procedures using force sensors. J Real-Time Image Proc. 2021; 18: 773– 1785. doi: 10.1007/s11554-021-01122-x
31.    Khalaf OI, Abdulsahib GM, Kasmaei HD, Ogudo KA. A new algorithm on application of blockchain technology in live stream video transmissions and telecommunications. Int J e-Collaboration (IJeC). 2020; 16:16– 32. doi: 10.4018/IJeC.2020010102
32.    Abdulsahib GM, Khalaf OI. An improved algorithm to fire detection in forest by using wireless sensor networks. Int J Civil Eng Technol (IJCIET). 2018;  9: 369–77.
33.    Abdulsahib GM, Khalaf IO. Comparison and evaluation of cloud processing models in cloud-based networks. Int J Simul Syst Sci Technol. 2018; 19: 5. doi:10.5013/IJSSST.a.19.05.26


Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Journal Policies & Information


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available