Author(s): Sheila Menon, Vidya Bhagat

Email(s): menonsheila@yahoo.com

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00211   

Address: Sheila Menon1, Vidya Bhagat2
1London College of Clinical Hypnosis Asia, LCCH Asia, 807 Block B Phileo Damansara1, Jalan Damansara, Section 16/11 Petaling Jaya Selangor 46350 Malaysia.
2A.J. Institute of Hospital Management, Mangalore Rajeev Gandhi University, Mangalore 2, India.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 19,      Issue - 3,     Year - 2026


ABSTRACT:
Introduction: Hypnosis has historically attracted scepticism within academic and clinical contexts, often attributed to cultural misconceptions, early methodological inconsistency, and its association with non-scientific practices, rather than an absence of empirical support. Over the past several decades, advances in cognitive neuroscience and psychophysiology have increasingly clarified the mechanisms underlying hypnotic phenomena. Contemporary research demonstrates that hypnotherapy engages measurable neurobiological processes, including functional and structural neuroplasticity, alterations in brain network connectivity, modulation of attentional and executive control systems, changes in autonomic nervous system regulation, and shifts in neurochemical signalling. These mechanisms underpin observable changes in perception, emotion regulation, cognition, and behaviour. Hypnotherapy may therefore be conceptualised as operating within established cognitive-behavioural and neuroregulatory frameworks, rather than outside them. Aim: This study aims to contribute to the growing empirical literature by examining hypnotherapy through a cognitive-behavioural and neurobiological lens, clarifying its theoretical compatibility with contemporary models of learning, attention, and behavioural change. Methodology: A narrative literature review was conducted using PubMed, TRIP, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. Search terms included clinical hypnosis, cognitive framework, and behavioural science.. Inclusion criteria comprised peer-reviewed studies published between 2000 and 2025 that investigated the cognitive-behavioural mechanisms underlying hypnotherapy and its scientific validity. Conclusion: The literature reviewed indicates that hypnotherapy engages identifiable cognitive-behavioural and neurobiological mechanisms consistent with contemporary psychological and behavioural science. Evidence of changes in attentional control, perception, emotional regulation, and brain-based functional organisation following hypnotic interventions supports the conceptualisation of hypnotherapy as an evidence-informed, cognitively mediated therapeutic approach. Framing hypnotherapy within established scientific frameworks -particularly those concerned with attention, learning, prediction, and regulation, clarifies its mechanisms of action and strengthens its theoretical coherence. Such positioning may enhance its credibility, support its integration within clinical practice, and facilitate broader acceptance within mainstream healthcare and psychological sciences.


Cite this article:
Sheila Menon, Vidya Bhagat. Cognitive-Behavioural Framework for Advancing the Scientific Status of Hypnotherapy. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(3):1466-0. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00211

Cite(Electronic):
Sheila Menon, Vidya Bhagat. Cognitive-Behavioural Framework for Advancing the Scientific Status of Hypnotherapy. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(3):1466-0. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00211   Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2026-19-3-72


REFERENCES:
1.    Elkins GR, Barabasz AF, Council JR, Spiegel D. Advancing research and practice: the revised APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2015; 63(1): 1–9.
2.    Montgomery GH, Schnur JB, Kravits K. Hypnosis for cancer care: over 200 years young. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013; 63(1): 31–44.
3.    Jensen MP, Patterson DR. Hypnotic approaches for chronic pain management: clinical implications of recent research findings. Am Psychol. 2014; 69(2):167–177.
4.    Hammond DC. Hypnosis in the treatment of anxiety- and stress-related disorders. Expert Rev Neurother. 2010; 10(2): 263–273.
5.    Beck JS. Cognitive Behavior Therapy: Basics and Beyond. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2011.
6.    Hofmann SG, Asnaani A, Vonk IJ, Sawyer AT, Fang A. The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: a review of meta-analyses. Cogn Ther Res. 2012; 36(5): 427–440.
7.    Kirsch I. Response expectancy theory and application: a decennial review. Appl Prev Psychol. 1997; 6(2): 69–79.
8.    Lynn SJ, Kirsch I, Hallquist MN. Social cognitive theories of hypnosis. In: Nash MR, Barnier AJ, editors. The Oxford Handbook of Hypnosis. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008. p. 111–139.
9.    Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977; 84(2): 191–215.
10.    Menon S, Bhagat V. Neuroplasticity and Clinical Hypnosis: Advancing Therapeutic Prospects in Neuropsychological Health and Well-being. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2025; 18(5): 2371-7.
11.    Menon S, Bhagat V. Integrating Cognitive Behavioural Therapy and Clinical Hypnotherapy: Establishing EFET as a Credentialed Framework for Enhanced Clinical Outcomes in Anxiety Treatment. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2025: Feb 1; 18(2): 935-43.
12.    Spiegel D, Williams L, Etkin A. Functional connectivity of dissociated executive control networks in hypnosis. Cereb Cortex. 2016; 26(7):2895–2904.
13.    Kirsch I. Response expectancy theory and application: A decennial review. Appl Prev Psychol. 1997; 6(2): 69–79.
14.    Kirsch I. Response expectancy as a determinant of experience and behavior. Am Psychol. 1985; 40(11): 1189–1202.
15.    Green JP, Barabasz AF, Barrett D, Montgomery GH. Forging ahead: The 2003 APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2005; 53(3): 259–264.
16.    Posner MI, Rothbart MK. Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annu Rev Psychol. 2007; 58: 1-23.
17.    Raz A. Attention and hypnosis: Neural substrates and cognitive mechanisms. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2005; 14(6): 316–320.
18.    Oakley DA, Halligan PW. Hypnotic suggestion and cognitive neuroscience. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013; 17(5): 234–242.
19.    Beck JS. Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press; 2011.
20.    Alladin A. Cognitive hypnotherapy: An integrated approach to the treatment of emotional disorders. 2nd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2016.
21.    Bryant RA, Moulds ML, Guthrie RM, Nixon RDV. Imagery rehearsal therapy for PTSD. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2005; 73(4): 659–669.
22.    Wolpe J. Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford: Stanford University Press; 1958.
23.    Bouton ME. Learning and behavior: A contemporary synthesis. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 2007.
24.    Hammond DC. Handbook of hypnotic suggestions and metaphors. New York: Norton; 1990.
25.    Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977; 84(2):191–215.
26.    Alladin A, Alibhai A. Cognitive hypnotherapy for depression: An empirical investigation. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2007; 55(2): 147–166.
27.    Lynn SJ, Kirsch I, Barabasz A, Cardeña E, Patterson D. Hypnosis as an empirically supported clinical intervention. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2000; 48(2): 239–259.
28.    Gross JJ. The emerging field of emotion regulation: An integrative review. Rev Gen Psychol. 1998; 2(3): 271–299.
29.    Milling LS, Reardon JM, Carosella GM. Psychological factors and hypnotic analgesia. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2006; 54(3):273–296.
30.    Holroyd J. The science of meditation and hypnosis. Am J Clin Hypn. 2003; 45(4): 303–318.
31.    Chambless DL, Ollendick TH. Empirically supported psychological interventions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001; 52:685–716.
32.    Elkins GR, Barabasz AF, Council JR, Spiegel D. Advancing research and practice of clinical hypnosis. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2015; 63(1): 1–9.
33.    Kirsch I, Montgomery G, Sapirstein G. Hypnosis as an adjunct to cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy: A meta-analysis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1995; 63(2): 214–220.
34.    Schoenberger NE. Research on hypnosis as an adjunct to cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2000; 48(2): 154–169.
35.    Montgomery GH, David D, Winkel G, Silverstein JH, Bovbjerg DH. The effectiveness of adjunctive hypnosis. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002; 70(4): 908–914.
36.    Barber TX. Hypnosis: A scientific approach. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1969.
37.    Kirsch I, Lynn SJ. The altered state of hypnosis debate. Am Psychol. 1995; 50(10):846–858.
38.    Lynn SJ, Green JP. The sociocognitive and dissociation theories of hypnosis. Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2011; 59(3): 289–303.

Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Journal Policies & Information


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available