Author(s):
A. Anitha, J. Sridevi, S. Anusuya, V.N. Avinash
Email(s):
anithaarul86@gmail.com
DOI:
10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00234.6 
Address:
A. Anitha1, J. Sridevi2, S. Anusuya2, V.N. Avinash2
1Assistant Professor, Saveetha college of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Thandalam, Chennai-602105.
2BPT Final year, Saveetha college of Physiotherapy, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences (SIMATS), Thandalam, Chennai-602105.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 13,
Issue - 3,
Year - 2020
ABSTRACT:
Pain is the most primary symptom in patients with shoulder disorders affecting the soft tissue. In most cases painful restriction of the range of shoulder movements limitis the ability to perfrme daily activities. The cumulative annual incidences of shoulder disorders vary from 7 to 25 per 1000 general consulation.Likewise Periarthritis shoulder is classified as a clinical entity presenting a unique pathology occuring only at the shoulder joint. Periarthritis shoulder is booming out as an are of interest to the orthopaedic surgeons and as well as to the physical therapist. The condition is attributed with pain initially which later on woreses as in ability to do the funcyional activities leading to disability. Indexes of pain, joint range and functional performance were recorded as pre and post test values for a period of 2 weeks. The study shows decreased in the values of NPRS from a mean value of 7.53 to 2.53, improvement of shoulder abduction joint range from mean value of 74.13 to 92.33 and external rotation with a mean value from 28.47 to 46.81 along with improvement of the functional performance from a mean value of 54.99 to 47.44. The shoulder abduction and the external rotation joint range were found to be significant increase with the P value (<0.0001) statistically significant along with improvement of the functional performance with the P value (<0.0001) statistically significant. Thus the study concludes that end range mobilisation along with conventional treatment is more effective in reducing pain with improvement in the joint range and the functional performance. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy end range mobilisation when added to standard treatment for Periarthritis shoulder.
Cite this article:
A. Anitha, J. Sridevi, S. Anusuya, V.N. Avinash. Effectiveness of End Range Mobilization along with conventional therapy in patients with Periarthritis Shoulder. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2020; 13(3):1271-1276. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00234.6
Cite(Electronic):
A. Anitha, J. Sridevi, S. Anusuya, V.N. Avinash. Effectiveness of End Range Mobilization along with conventional therapy in patients with Periarthritis Shoulder. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2020; 13(3):1271-1276. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00234.6 Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2020-13-3-39
REFERENCES:
1. Dhruvika Makwana, Nehal Shah: Effect of end range mobilization and mobilization with movement in patients with adhesive capsulitis. International journal of recent scientific research. 2015 Dec; 6(12):7992-7996.
2. Martin J. Kelley, et al: Frozen shoulder: evidence and a proposed model guiding rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Feb; 39(2):135-48.
3. Grubbs.N. Frozen shoulder syndrome: a review of literature. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther.1993; 18:479– 487
4. Rizk TE, Pinals RS. Frozen shoulder. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1982; 11:440– 452
5. Murnaghan JP .Frozen shoulder. In: Rockwood CA, Matsen FA,eds. The Shoulder. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1990:837– 862
6. Vecchio PC, et al. Community survey of shoulder disorders in the elderly to assess the natural history and effects of treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 1995;54 :152– 154
7. Sreenivasu K, et al: Effectiveness of end range mobilization with scapular mobilization in frozen. IAIM, 2016; 3(8):53-58.
8. Neviaser, Julius S. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: A Study of the Pathological Findings in Periarthritis of the Shoulder JBJS: April 1945 - Volume 27 - Issue 2 - p 211-222
9. Sreenivasu K, et al: Effectiveness of end range mobilization with scapular mobilization in frozen. IAIM, 2016; 3(8):53-58.
10. Lakecountrypt: Frozen shoulder and end range mobilization. 2017 Mar 26.
11. Richard Dias, Steven Cutts, Samir Massoud: Frozen shoulder. BMJ. 2005 Dec 17; 331(7530):1453-6
12. Maitland GD. Treatment of the glenohumeral joint by passive movement. Physiotherapy 1983;69
13. Kaltenborn FM. Manual Therapy for the Extremity Joints. Oslo, Norway: Olaf Norlis Bokhandel; 1976
14. Mulligan BR. Mobilisations with movement. J Manual Manipulative Ther . 1993; 1:154– 156.
15. Dianne V Jewell, et al: Interventions associated increased or decreased likelihood of pain reduction and improved function in patients with adhesive capsulitis: a retrospective cohort study. Phys Ther. 2009 May; 89(5):419-29.
16. Margaret M. Horger; The reliability of goniometric measurements of active and passive wrist motions. American journal of Occupational Therapy. 1990 Apr; 44(4):342-8.
17. Vermeulen HM, et al. .End-range mobilization techniques in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint: a multiple-subject case report. Phys Ther . 2000; 80 :1204 – 1213.
18. Vermeulen HM, et al. . Comparison of high-grade and low-grade mobilization techniques in the management of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther. 2006; 86:355– 368.
19. Diercks RL, Stevens M. Gentle thawing of the frozen shoulder: a prospective study of supervised neglect versus intensive physical therapy in seventyseven patients with frozen shoulder syndrome followed up for two years. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2004; 13(5): 499-502.
20. Yang J.L., Chang C.W., Chen S.Y., Wang S.F., Lin J.J. Mobilization techniques in subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome: randomized multiple treatment trial. Physical Therapy, 2007; 87: 1307-1315.
21. Il-Young Yu, In-Gui Jung, Min-Hyeok Kang, Dong-Kyu Lee, Jae-Seop Oh: Immediate effects of an End-range mobilization technique on shoulder range of motion and skin temperature in individuals with posterior shoulder tightness. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jun; 27(6):1723-1725.
22. Gui Do Moon, Jin Yong Lim, Da Yeon Kim, Tae Ho Kim: Comparison of Maitland and kaltenborn mobilization techniques for improving shoulder pain and range of motion in frozen shoulders. J PhysTher Sci. 2015 May; 27(5):1391-1395.
23. Rasheed Masih Muhammad khan: Effect of mid-range mobilization (MRM) and end-range mobilization (ERM) in subjects with adhesive capsulitis. A quasi experimental study. International Conference and Exhibition on Orthopaedics & Rheumatology. 2012 August 13-15; 2(3):128.
24. Nicholson: The effects of passive joint mobilization on pain and hypo mobility associated with adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Journal of orthopaedics and sports Physiotherapy. 1985; 6(4):238- 46.
25. Henricus M Vermeulen, et al:End-range mobilization techniques in adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder joint: A multiple-subject case report.PhysTher.2000 Dec;80(12):1204-13.
26. Jing-lan Yang, et al: Effectiveness of the end-range mobilization and scapular mobilization approach in a subgroup of subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome: a randomized control trail. Man Ther.2012 Feb;17 (1):47-52.
27. Hui-Ting Lin, et al: Reliability of stiffness measured in glenohumeral joint and its application to assess the effect of end-range mobilization in subjects with adhesive capsulitis. Man Ther. 2008 Aug;13(4):307-316.
28. Jing-lanYang, et al: Mobilization techniques in subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome: Randomized multiple-treatment trial.Physical therapy. 2007 Oct 1; 87(10):1307-1315.
29. Aarti Dewan, Rohit Sharma: Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential electrotherapy in adhesive capsulitis. Pb journal of Orthopaedics. 2011; 12, No.1.
30. Sports injury clinic: Frozen shoulder exercises.
31. On your Mark.nyc: 11 exercises for shoulder rehabilitation and injury prevention. 2016 Oct 10.
32. Amazing fitness tips: A wall ladder exercise for a frozen shoulder. 2013 Mar 24. Edward P. Mulligan: Principles of joint mobilization. 2001