Author(s): Praveen Kumar.T, Dhanapal C K, M. Sudhakar, Satyabrata Bhanja, Ayyagari Akhila, PDSS Prakash

Email(s): raoclinpharm@gmail.com

DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00288.7   

Address: Praveen Kumar.T1, Dhanapal C K2, M. Sudhakar3, Satyabrata Bhanja4, Ayyagari Akhila5, PDSS Prakash6
1,3,4,5Department of Pharmacy Practice, Malla Reddy Hospital, Secunderabad, Telangana State.
2Department of Pharmacy, Annamalai College of Pharmacy, Annamalai University, Annamalai Nagar, Chidambaram.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 13,      Issue - 3,     Year - 2020


ABSTRACT:
Osteoporosis is a disease that is characterized by low bone mass, deterioration of bone tissue, and disrup¬tion of bone microarchitecture. The diagnosis and clinical management of osteoporosis relies mainly on the measurement of bone density, because low bone density is associated with future risk of atraumatic and fragility fractures. During the last three decades several techniques have been developed for the measurement of bone density which are safe, precise, and accurate. Most of these techniques used some form of ionizing radiation (x-rays), and the measurement obtained is based on the attenuation of a beam of energy as it passes through bone and soft tissues. The use of acoustic energy in the form of ultrasound wave has been suggested as possible choice for the assessment of bone integrity and to determine bone's response to mechanical loads to predict the risk of fracture. Transmission mode uses two transducers, one acting as transmitter and the other as a receiver of the ultrasound wave. Achilles Express bone Ultrasonometer is used to evaluate bone status by measuring stiffness index in the heel. Measurement of BUA (Broadband Ultrasound Attenuation) involves sending a broadband ultrasound pulse through the bone and measuring the reduction in intensity at different frequencies. Stiffness Index which represents bone mineral density, combines BUA and SOS (Speed of Sound) into a single clinical measure that has a lower precision error than either variable alone. The T-score is the most significant parameter for the assessment of osteoporosis. It is concluded that QUS can be effectively used to study the bone mineral loss and QUS clearly distinguishes between normal and osteoporotic subjects and can be a useful index in clinical management of osteoporosis. Thus Achilles Express Ultrasonometer is a reasonable and accurate screening tool to detect low BMD.


Cite this article:
Praveen Kumar.T, Dhanapal C K, M. Sudhakar, Satyabrata Bhanja, Ayyagari Akhila, PDSS Prakash. Significance of achilles Ultrasonometer in the precised Diagnosis and Assessment of Osteoporosis. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2020; 13(3):1592-1596. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00288.7

Cite(Electronic):
Praveen Kumar.T, Dhanapal C K, M. Sudhakar, Satyabrata Bhanja, Ayyagari Akhila, PDSS Prakash. Significance of achilles Ultrasonometer in the precised Diagnosis and Assessment of Osteoporosis. Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2020; 13(3):1592-1596. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00288.7   Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2020-13-3-93


REFERENCES:
1.    Tümay S,  Lale Ö,  Nursel  CB.. An overview and management of osteoporosis, European  J  Rheumatology. 2017; 4(1): 46–56.
2.    Cosman F, et al. Clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. J Os¬teoporos International. 2014; 25: 2359-81.
3.    Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd. Hip frac¬tures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. . J Os¬teoporos International. 1992; 2: 285-9.
4.    Mithal A, Kaur P. Osteoporosis in Asia: a call to action. J Current Osteoporosis Reports. 2012 ;10(4):245-7.
5.    Tuzun S, et al. Incidence of hip fracture and prevalence of osteoporosis in Tur¬key: the FRACTURK study. J Osteoporos International.  2012; 23: 949-55.
6.    Damiano F, Rochira A, Gnoni A. Action of Thyroid Hormones, T3 and T2, on Hepatic Fatty Acids: Differ-encesin Metabolic Effects and Molecular Mechanisms.  Int. J. Mol. Sci. 12017;8: 744.
7.    Pedro J,TárragaLópez P J, López C F, Casas A G. Osteoporosis in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism treated with thyroid hormon. Clinical Cases in Mineral and Bone Metabolism, 2011; 8(3): 44-48.
8.    Batool Ibrahim H, Hussein Jasim AL, Maysaa A. Impact of Thyroidectomy in BMI and Some Biochemical Markers related with Bone Turnover in Hypothyroidism Women, Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2019; 12 (2) :589-594.
9.    Riggs BL, et al. Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes. J Clinical Investigation 1982; 70: 716-23.
10.    Kanis JA, et al. The use of clinical risk fac¬tors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. J Osteoporosis International. 2007; 18: 1033-46.
11.    D'Amelio P, Isaia GC. Male Osteoporosis in the Elderly. International J Endocrinol. 2015; 2015: 907689.
12.    De Laet C, et al. Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. J Oste¬oporos International. 2005; 16: 1330-8.
13.    Fox KM, Cummings SR, Powell-Threets K, Stone K. Family history and risk of osteoporotic fracture. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Osteoporosis International. 1998; 8: 557-62.
14.    Kanis JA, Johnell O. Smoking and fracture risk: a meta-analysis. J Osteoporosis International. 2005; 16: 155-62.
15.    Kanis JA, Stevenson M, McCloskey EV, Davis S, Lloyd-Jones M. Glucocorticoid-induced oste-oporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis. J Health Technology Assessment. 2007; 11: 1-231.
16.    Kanis JA, et al. Alcohol intake as a risk factor for fracture. J Osteoporosis International. 2005; 16: 737-42.
17.    Sarkis KS, Salvador MB, Pinheiro MM, Silva RG, Zerbini CA, Martini LA. Association between os-teoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis in women: a cross-sectional study. J Sao Paulo Medical. 2009; 127: 216-22
18.    Kanis JA, on behalf of the World Health Orga-nization Scientific Group,  Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical Report. World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Dis¬eases, University of Sheffield, UK. 2007
19.     Seeman E, Delmas PD. Bone quality--the ma¬terial and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. New England J Medicine. 2006; 354: 2250-61.
20.    Schousboe JT SJ, Bilezikian JP, Baim S. Executive Summary of the 2013 ISCD Position Develop¬ment Conference on Bone Densitometry. J Clinical Densitometry. 2013; 16: 455-66.
21.     Nelson HD, Haney EM, Chou R, Dana T, Fu R, Bougatsos C. Screening for osteoporosis: sys¬tematic review to update the 2002 U.S. Preven¬tive Services Task Force Recommendation. Evi¬dence Synthesis No. 77. AHRQ Publication No. 10-05145-EF-1. Rockville, Maryland: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2010.
22.     Kanis JA, et. Case finding for the man¬agement of osteoporosis with FRAX--assess¬ment and intervention thresholds for the UK. J Osteoporos International. 2008; 19: 1395-408.
23.    20. J.J. Kaufman and T.A. Einhorn. Perspectives ultrasound assessment of bone, J Bone and Mineral Research. 1993;8: 517-525.
24.    C.M. Langton, A.V. Ali, C.M. Riggs, G.P. Evans and W. Bonfield, A contact method for the assessment of ultrasonic velocity and broadband attenuation in cortical and cancellous bone, J Clinical Physics and Physiologic Measurement. 1990;11: 243-249.
25.    D.K. Jenkins, Assessing bone mass with the QUS-2 calcaneal ultrasonometer, Quidel Corporation, 226A US 5/01 ,2001; 1-11.
26.    J. Vogel, R. Wasnich and P. Ross, Clinical relevance of calcaneus bone mineral measurement: A review. J Bone and Mineral Research.  1988;5:35-58.
27.    Pluskiewicz W,Drozdzowska B.Ultrasonic measurement of the calcaneus in Polish normal and osteoporotic women and men. J Bone and Mineral Research. 1999;24: 611- 617.
28.    Riggs BL, et al. Changes in bone mineral density of the proximal femur and spine with aging. Differences between the postmenopausal and senile osteoporosis syndromes. J Clinical Investigation. 1982; 70: 716-23.

Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Journal Policies & Information


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available