Dakshita Snud Sharma, Sandip J Sutariya, Harmanpreet Kaur, Hitendra A Somani, Amit Gupta
Dakshita Snud Sharma1, Sandip J Sutariya1, 2, Harmanpreet Kaur1, Hitendra A Somani 2, Amit Gupta1
1Department of Biotechnology, Graphic Era (Deemed to be) University, Dehradun.
2Nirmala Hospital IVF test tube baby center, Bhavnagar, Gujarat.
Volume - 14,
Issue - 12,
Year - 2021
Due to its tremendous success ratio of in vitro fertilization (IVF) in India has gained boundless momentum. This is mainly applied and designed pertaining to overcome the infertility ratio and produce or cause a pregnancy which is mainly due to direct intervention. Generally, most of the aspiring parents either from rural or urban areas have taken the aid of IVF to full their desire to have children. IVF is welcoming as it is an extremely safe and result driven procedure. India is slated to be the world’s youngest country by 2020 and this has led India to become more liberal, advanced and there has been a huge change in lifestyle. This technique is more acceptable and recognizable in terms of artificial reproductive procedures. Now a day, IVF success rate is still staggering (nearly $829.5 million till 2023) according to the report of Allied Market Research. Due to its success rate in terms of advanced technologies, various people coming from rural areas also started to opt for this technique i.e. IVF and allied types of procedures (infertility) which is mainly not involved or depending any demographics and socio-economic background of an individual.
Cite this article:
Dakshita Snud Sharma, Sandip J Sutariya, Harmanpreet Kaur, Hitendra A Somani, Amit Gupta. Technological advancement: In vitro fertilization (IVF). Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(12):6721-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.01161
Dakshita Snud Sharma, Sandip J Sutariya, Harmanpreet Kaur, Hitendra A Somani, Amit Gupta. Technological advancement: In vitro fertilization (IVF). Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(12):6721-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.01161 Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2021-14-12-91
1. Kaur S, Sidhu GK. Quasi- Experimental Study to evaluate the effectiveness of Soya powder on selected menopausal problems among perimenopausal women in selected rural areas of Ludhiana, Punjab. Asian J Nur Edu and Research 2017; 7(4): 524-528.
2. Nair NP, Kumar V. A study to assess the effectiveness of structured teaching programme on the knowledge of women regarding menopausal changes in selected rural areas of Mysore. Asian J Nur Edu and Research 2015; 5(3): 385-388.
3. Deshmane SB. Impact of Science and Technology on Indian Rural Society: A Sociological study. imperial Journal of interdisciplinary research 2016; 2(13), 39-42.
4. Broekmans FJ, Kwee J, Hendriks DJ, Mol BW, Lambalk CB. A systematic review of tests predicting ovarian reserve and IVF outcome. Hum Reprod Update. 2006; 12(6): 685–718.
5. La Marca A, Nelson SM, Sighinolfi G, Manno M, Baraldi E, Roli L, et al. Anti-Müllerian hormone-based prediction model for a live birth in assisted reproduction. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011; 22(4): 341–9.
6. Cai QF, Wan F, Huang R, Zhang HW. Factors predicting the cumulative outcome of IVF/ICSI treatment: a multivariable analysis of 2450 patients. Hum Reprod. 2011; 26(9): 2532–40.
7. Te Velde ER, Nieboer D, Lintsen AM, Braat DDM, Eijkemans MJC, Habbema JDF, et al. Comparison of two models predicting IVF success; the effect of time trends on model performance. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29(1): 57–64.
8. Sodhi HK. IVF Fertilization and Psychological Consequences. Int. J Nur Edu and Research 2020; 8(1): 123-124.
9. Boivin J, Bunting L, Collins JA, Nygren KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2007; 22(6): 1506–12.
10. Rittenberg V, Seshadri S, Sunkara SK, Sobaleva S, Oteng-Ntim E, El-Toukhy T. Effect of body mass index on IVF treatment outcome: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011; 23(4): 421–39.
11. Milewski R, Milewska AJ, Czerniecki J, Leśniewska M, Wołczyński S. [Analysis of the demographic profile of patients treated for infertility using assisted reproductive techniques in 2005–2010]. Ginekol Pol. 2013; 84(7): 609–14.
12. Mac Dougall K, Beyene Y, Nachtigall RD. Age shock: misperceptions of the impact of age on fertility before and after IVF in women who conceived after age 40. Hum Reprod Oxf Engl. 2013; 28(2): 350–6.
13. Jain T, Harlow BL, Hornstein MD. Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med. 2002; 347(9): 661–6.
14. Hiba H. Kadhim, Salman A. Ahmed. Anti-mullerian Hormone and Vitamin D as a predictor of ovarian reserve and ovarian response in infertile women undergoing IVF. Research J Pharm and Tech 2019; 12(7): 3527-3530.
15. Sowjanya G. A Study to describe the knowledge and attitude of infertile women regarding assisted reproductive techniques (ART) at a Selected Infertility Clinic, Bangalore. Asian J Nur Edu Research 2011; 1(1): 06-08.
16. Wdowiak A, Lewicka M, Plewka K, et al. Nicotinism and quality of embryos obtained in in-vitro fertilization programmes. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2013; 20(1): 82–85.
17. Vishwas AS. An observational Study to assess the nicotine dependence among Tobacco users in selected rural areas of Udaipur (Raj). Int J of advances in Nur Management 2019; 7(3):194-196.
18. Fréour T, Dessolle L, Lammers J, Lattes S, Barrière P. Comparison of embryo morphokinetics after in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection in smoking and nonsmoking women. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99(7): 1944–50.