Author(s): Shivashankar Kengadaran, Srisakthi. D., Divvi Anusha, Gopinath Prakasam, Kavitha. M, Vigneshwari. S.K

Email(s): shiva.freee@gmail.com

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00395   

Address: Dr. Shivashankar Kengadaran1, Dr. Srisakthi. D.2, Dr. Divvi Anusha3, Dr. Gopinath Prakasam4, Dr. Kavitha. M5, Dr. Vigneshwari. S.K6
1,3Department of Public Health Dentistry, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Pondicherry.
2Reader, Department of Public Health Dentistry, Saveetha Dental College, Chennai.
4Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Royal Dental College, Palakkad, Kerala.
5Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Pondicherry.
6Department of Conservative and Endodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Pondicherry.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 14,      Issue - 4,     Year - 2021


ABSTRACT:
Introduction: Nosocomial infections are caused by the retrograde spread of viral, bacterial and fungal pathogens from the hospital environment to the patients. Despite the efforts to avoid cross-infection in the dental office using sterilized instruments, individual protection equipment, and disinfection procedures, there is an increased risk of cross-infection through dental units, since one dental chair is used to treat many patients. Materials and methods: Seven strains of micro-organisms- Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella, Enterococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, E. coli, and Legionella were taken. Neem extract, Aloe Vera Juice, and 0.2% chlorhexidine were tested against all these organisms. Sterile discs were incorporated with an equal amount of prepared formulations using a micropipette. Then these discs were placed equidistant to each other following which these plates were incubated for 24 hours. Results: Zone of inhibition was higher in chlorhexidine 12mm, 22mm, 11mm, 8mm, 18mm, 12mm, 11mm, 14mm and 15 mm followed by neem extract 7mm, no inhibition, 10mm, 7mm, 11mm, 7mm, 11mm and 9 mm and no inhibition by Aloe Vera juice against Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Klebsiella, Enterococcus, Staphylococcus Aureus, Candida albicans, E.coli and Legionella respectively. Conclusion: Results from this study have shown that chlorhexidine was most effective against dental unit waterline pathogens followed by neem extract and least by Aloe Vera juice.


Cite this article:
Shivashankar Kengadaran, Srisakthi. D., Divvi Anusha, Gopinath Prakasam, Kavitha. M, Vigneshwari. S.K. Comparing the efficacy of Neem extract, Aloe vera juice, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine against dental unit waterline pathogens. an In-vitro study. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(4):2224-8. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00395

Cite(Electronic):
Shivashankar Kengadaran, Srisakthi. D., Divvi Anusha, Gopinath Prakasam, Kavitha. M, Vigneshwari. S.K. Comparing the efficacy of Neem extract, Aloe vera juice, and 0.2% Chlorhexidine against dental unit waterline pathogens. an In-vitro study. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(4):2224-8. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00395   Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2021-14-4-71


REFERENCES: 
1. Szymańska J. Control methods of the microbial water quality in dental unit waterlines. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2003;10:1-4.
2. Kengadaran S, Srisakthi D, Arumugham IM, Pradeepkumar R. Knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding dental unit waterline disinfection among dental practitioners of India. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research| Jul-Sep. 2017;7(3). 
3. Padma RM. Control & prevention of biofilm in dental office. Indian Journal of Dental Advancements. 2011 Apr 1;3(2):512-21.
4. American Dental Association. Oral health topic. Dental unit waterline. Available from: http://www.ada.org/en/member-center/oral-health-topics/dental-unit-waterlines. last accessed on 14-7-2017
5. McDonnell G, Russell AD. Antiseptics and disinfectants: activity, action, and resistance. Clinical Microbiology Reviews. 1999 Jan 1;12(1):147-79.
6. Kathariya MD, Kashinath PS, Kulkarni S, Singh D, Akkareddy B, Kathariya R. Evaluation of bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines and the efficacy of commercially available disinfectants. Int. J. Pub. Health Dentistry. 2013;4(1):23-8.
7. Olaleye MT, Bello-Michael CO. Comparative antimicrobial activities of Aloe vera gel and leaf. African Journal of Biotechnology. 2005;4(12).
8. Roberson MC, Heggers JP, Hagstrom Jr WJ. Myth, magic, witchcraft, or fact? Aloe vera revisited. Journal of Burn Care and Research. 1982. May 1;3(3):154-63.
9. Lekshmi P, Sowmia N, Viveka S, Brindha JR, Jeeva S. The inhibiting effect of Azadirachta indica against dental pathogens. Asian J Plant Sci Res. 2012;2(1):6-10.
10. Achio S, Ameko E, Kutsanedzie F, Alhassan S. Insecticidal effects of various neem preparations against some insects of agricultural and public health concern. International Journal of Research in BioSciences. 2012;1(2):11-9.
11. Coleman DC, O’Donnell MJ, Shore AC, Swan J, Russell RJ. The role of manufacturers in reducing biofilms in dental chair waterlines. J Dent. 2007;35:701-11
12. Kotaka CR, Garcia LB, Ito FA, Fuganti MR, Carnio J, Pelayo JS. Evaluation of the level of microbial contamination and prevalence of gram-negative non-fermentative rods in dental unit waterlines. RSBO (Online). 2012 Sep;9(3):245-53.
13. Kamma JJ, Bradshaw DJ, Fulford MR, Marsh PD, Frandsen E, Østergaard E, Schel AJ, Cate JM, Moorer WR, Mavridou A, Mandilara G. Attitudes of general dental practitioners in Europe to the microbial risk associated with dental unit water systems. International Dental Journal. 2006 Aug 1;56(4):187-95.
14. Tilak AH, Geetha Priya S, Raja K. Microbial Contamination in Dental unit water line. Int. J. Pharma Bio. Sci. 2012;3(4):1032-44.

Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Journal Policies & Information


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available