The Effect of Chitosan Addition in Acrylic Resin Matrix towards the Residual Monomers and Impact Strength

Titik Ismiyati; Ananto Ali Alhasyimi

doi:10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00403

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology

ISSN

0974-360X (Online)
0974-3618 (Print)

Submit Article

The Effect of Chitosan Addition in Acrylic Resin Matrix towards the Residual Monomers and Impact Strength

Author(s): Titik Ismiyati, Ananto Ali Alhasyimi

Email(s): drg_titikis@ugm.ac.id

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00403

Address: Titik Ismiyati1*, Ananto Ali Alhasyimi2
1Faculty of Dentistry, Prostodontic Department, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia.
2Faculty of Dentistry, Orthodontic Department, Gadjah Mada University, Indonesia.
*Corresponding Author

Published In: Volume - 14, Issue - 4, Year - 2021

View HTML

View PDF

ABSTRACT:
Background: A residual monomer might have impact on the quality of acrylic resin since its caused allergic reactions and inflammation. Chitosan is a biocompatible material and potential to reduce residual monomers and ameliorate the impact strength of acrylic resin Objective of the study: To examine the effect of an acrylic resin matrix mixed with chitosan together with 1% and 2% acrylic acid as denture base and orthodontic material on residual monomers and impact strength. Methodology: There were 30 samples for the test analysis. The impact strength test sample formed with a plate size of 55 × 10 × 10mm, whereas the residual monomer test sample was prepared into powder. The test samples were divided into 3 groups, of 10 samples. Group 1 acrylic resin only, group 2 acrylic resin matrix mixed with chitosan and 1% acrylic acid, group 3 is the same as group 2 but with a concentration of 2% acrylic acid. Gas chromatography was used for measuring the residual monomers. The impact strength was tested by the Charpy impact. The data was evaluated using the ANOVA and correlation test. Results: There were significant differences (p < 0.05) in acrylic resin without addition with the matrix of acrylic resin with chitosan and acrylic acid 1% and 2% to the number of monomers and impact strength. Conclusion: The mixture of acrylic resin with chitosan and acrylic acid 1% and 2% can reduce the amount of residual monomer and increase the impact strength.

Keywords:

Cite this article:
Titik Ismiyati, Ananto Ali Alhasyimi. The Effect of Chitosan Addition in Acrylic Resin Matrix towards the Residual Monomers and Impact Strength. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(4):2280-5. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00403

Cite(Electronic):
Titik Ismiyati, Ananto Ali Alhasyimi. The Effect of Chitosan Addition in Acrylic Resin Matrix towards the Residual Monomers and Impact Strength. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(4):2280-5. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00403 Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2021-14-4-79

REFERENCES:

1. Craig RG, Restorative dental material, 11th ed, 2013, New York: Churchill Livingstone Edinburg. p. 25–195.

2. Carr AB, Brown DT, McCracken’s Removable Partial Prosthodontics 12th ed., 2012, Singapore, Mosby Elsevier, p.7, 106–107, 346.

3. Powers JM, Sakaguchi RL, Craig's Restorative Dental Materials 12th ed, 2012, St.Louis, Elsevier, p. 524–544.

4. Samarayanake LP, Essential Microbiology for Dentistry, 2nd ed., 2002m Churchil Livingstone, Edinburgh, p.142–147.

5. Anusavice KJ, Phillips RW, Shen C, Rawls HR, Phillips’ science of dental materials,11th ed., 2003, St. Louis, Mo: Elsevier, p.721–722.

6. Chaves CA, Machado AL, Vergani CE, Souza RF, Giampaolo ET, Cytotoxicity of denture base acrylic resins: a literature review, J Prosthet Dent 2012;107: 114–27.

7. Sihono RS, Wahyuningtyas E, Ismiyati T, Silica coating application on heat-cured acrylic resin plates toward the surface hardness and the amount of residual monomer, Padjadjaran J Dent, 2019;31(2):123–129.

8. Duta KP, Dutta J, Tripathi JVS, Chitin and kitosan chemistry, properties and applications, J Sci Industrial Res, 2004;63(1):20-31.

9. Sivakumar SM, Mohammed MS, Aamena J, Kannadasan M, Pharmaceutical aspects of chitosan polymer “in brief”, Research J Pharm Tech, 2013;6(12): 1439–1442.

10. Tikhonov VE, Stepnova EA, Babak VG, Yamskov IA, Palma-Guerrero J, Jasson H, lopez-Lorca lV, Salinas J, Gerasimenko DV, Avdienko ID, Varlamov VP, Bactericidal and antifungal activities of a low molecular weight chitosan and its n-/2(3)-(Dodec-2-Enyl)Succinoyl/-derivatives, Carbohyd Polym, 2006; 64: 66–72.

11. Rinaudo M, Pavlov G, Desbrieres, Influence of acetic acid concentration on solubilization of chitosan, Polymer, 1999;40: 7029–7032.

12. Synowiecki J, Al-Khateeb NA, Production, properties, and some new applications of chitin and its derivatives, Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr, 2003; 42(2): 145–171.

13. Kim IY, Seo SJ, Moon HS, Yoo MK, Park IY, Kim, BC, Cho CS, Chitosan and its derivates for tissue engineering applications, Biotechnol Adv, 2008; 26(1):1–21.

14. Wang H, Li W, Lu Y, Wang Z, Studies on chitosan and poly(acrylic acid) interpolymer complex. I. Preparation, structure, pH‐sensitivity, and salt sensitivity of complex‐forming poly(acrylic acid): Chitosan semi‐interpenetrating polymer network, J Appl Polym Sci, 1997;65:1445–1450.

15. Ismiyati T, Siswomihardjo W, Soesatyo MHNE, Rochmasi, R, Cytoxicity test of a mixture of acrylic resin with chitosan as an anti-fungal denture material, Journal Tekno Sains, 2016; 5 (2): 81–146.

16. Sitorus Z, Dahar E, Improvement of physical and mechanical properties of hot polymerized acrylic resin with the addition of glass fibers, Dentika Den J, 2016; 17 (1): 24–29.Niessen WMA, Current Practice of Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry, 2001, New York, Marcel Dekker Inc., p.2–28.

17. Urban VM, Cass QB, Oliveira RV, Giampaolo ET, Machado AL, Development and application of methods for determination of residual monomer in dental acrylic resins using high performance liquid chromatography, Biomed Chromatogr, 2006; 20(4): 369–376.

18. Feng D, Gong H, Zhang J, Guo X, Yan M, Zhu S, Effects of antibacterial coating on monomer exudation and the mechanical properties of denture base resins, J Prosth Dent, 2017; 117(1): 171–177.