Alaa Waleed Al Jaouni, Souad Abboud
Alaa Waleed Al Jaouni1, Souad Abboud2
1Master Student, Department of Endodontics and Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University.
2Assist. Prof., Department of Endodontics and Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Damascus University.
Volume - 15,
Issue - 1,
Year - 2022
Background: Fiber reinforced composite resin (FRC) posts are used to restore endodontically treated teeth. Many factors affect the bond strength of posts; however, there is a concern regarding the mismatch between the posts and oval root canals and its effect on posts retention. Aim: To compare the bond strength of circular and oval-shaped fiber-reinforced composite posts in oval shaped canals. Materials and Methods: Forty Five extracted single rooted human premolars with single oval-shaped root canals were decorated, endodontically treated and prepared to receive quartz reinforced composite resin posts, then they were randomly assigned to three groups, the posts in the first group (control) (n=15) were parallel with circular cross section (Match post, RTD, France), the posts in the second group (n=15) were taper with circular cross section (DtLight Illusion post, RTD, France), The posts in the third group were oval shaped (Macro lock oval post, RTD, France). The posts in the three groups were cemented with dual cure resin cement (Permflo DC Composite Luting, Ultra dent, USA). All samples were then stored in 100% relative humidityat at room temperature for 24 hours then pull-out test was performed and data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Bonferonni's post hoc test (a = 0.05). Results: Oval shaped posts showed higher bond strength values than circular posts, whether the circular posts were conical(taper)or parallel (control) (p<0.05).Conclusions: The bond strength of fiber reinforced composite resin posts in oval root canals increased when the posts were oval-shaped.
Cite this article:
Alaa Waleed Al Jaouni, Souad Abboud. Comparison of the Bond Strength of Circular and Oval-Shaped Fiber-Reinforced Composite Posts in Oval Shaped Canals. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(1):343-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00056
Alaa Waleed Al Jaouni, Souad Abboud. Comparison of the Bond Strength of Circular and Oval-Shaped Fiber-Reinforced Composite Posts in Oval Shaped Canals. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(1):343-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00056 Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2022-15-1-56
1. Park, J.-S., et al., Comparison of push-out bond strength of fiber-reinforced composite resin posts according to cement thickness. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2017. 118(3): p. 372-378.
2. Faria, A.C.L., et al., Endodontically treated teeth: characteristics and considerations to restore them. Journal of Prosthodontic Research, 2011. 55(2): p. 69-74.
3. D’Arcangelo, C., et al., The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2007. 98(3): p. 193-198.
4. Fernandes, A.S., S. Shetty, and I. Coutinho, Factors determining post selection: a literature review. The Journal of Prosthetic dentistry, 2003. 90(6): p. 556-562.
5. Chan, F.W., J.K. Harcourt, and P.J. Brockhurst, The effect of post adaptation in the root canal on retention of posts cemented with various cements. Australian Dental Journal, 1993. 38(1): p. 39-45.
6. Carvalho, C.A. and M. Ferrari, Resin cement thickness in oval-shaped canals: oval vs. circularfiber posts in combination with different tips/drills for post space preparation. American Journal of Dentistry, 2009. 22(5).
7. Morgano, S.M., A.H. Rodrigues, and C.E. Sabrosa, Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dental Clinics, 2004. 48(2): p. 416-397.
8. Standlee, J.P., et al., The retentive and stress-distributing properties of a threaded endodontic dowel. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1980. 44(4): p. 398-404.
9. Goracci, C. and M. Ferrari, Current perspectives on post systems: a literature review. Australian Dental Journal, 2011. 56: p. 77-83.
10. Maroulakos, G., J. He, and W.W. Nagy, The Post–endodontic Adhesive Interface: Theoretical Perspectives and Potential Flaws. Journal of Endodontics, 2018. 44(3): p. 363-371.
11. Grandini, S., et11. al., SEM evaluation of the cement layer thickness after luting two different posts. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 2005. 7(3).
12. Arslan, H., et al., A cone-beam computed tomographic study of root canal systems in mandibular premolars in a Turkish population: Theoretical model for determining orifice shape. European Journal of Dentistry, 2015. 9(01): p. 011-019.
13. Fan, B., et al., Root canal systems in mandibular first premolars with C-shaped root configurations. Part I: Microcomputed tomography mapping of the radicular groove and associated root canal cross-sections. Journal of Endodontics, 2008. 34(11): p. 1337-1341.
14. Muñoz, C., C. Llena, and L. Forner, Oval fiber posts do not improve adaptation to oval-shaped canal walls. Journal of Endodontics, 2011. 37(10): p. 1386-1389.
15. Coniglio, I., et al., Push-out bond strength of circular and oval-shaped fiber posts. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2011. 15(5): p. 667-672.
16. Farina, A.P., et al., Influence of cement type and relining procedure on pushout bond strength of fiber posts after cyclic loading. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2016. 25(1): p. 54-60.
17. Gomes, G.M., et al., Evaluation of different restorative techniques for filling flared root canals: fracture resistance and bond strength after mechanical fatigue. J Adhes Dent, 2014. 16(3): p. 267-76.
18. Silva, G.R.d., et al., Effect of post type and restorative techniques on the strain and fracture resistance of flared incisor roots. Brazilian Dental Journal, 2011. 22(3): p. 230-237.
19. Sarkis-19. Onofre, R., et al., Performance of post-retained single crowns: a systematic review of related risk factors. Journal of Endodontics, 2017. 43(2): p. 175-183.
20. Bitter, K., K. Neumann, and A.M. Kielbassa, Effects of pretreatment and thermocycling on bond strength of resin core materials to various fiber-reinforced composite posts. Journal of Adhesive Dentistry, 2008. 10(6).
21. Bateman, G., et al., Retention of quartz-fibre endodontic posts with a self-adhesive dual cure resin cement. The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 2005. 13(1): p. 33-37.
22. Santos, A.F., et al., Vertical root fracture in upper premolars with endodontic posts: finite element analysis. Journal of Endodontics, 2009. 35(1): p. 117-120.
23. Farid, F., et al., Effect of cement type and thickness on push-out bond strength of fiber posts. Journal of Dental Research, Dental Clinics, Dental Prospects, 2018. 12(4): p. 277.
24. Özcan, E., et al., The effect of luting cement thicknesses on the push-out bond strength of the fiber posts. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 2013. 71(3-4): p. 703-709.
25. Sahafi, A., et al., Retention of Root Canal Posts. Operative Dentistry. Supplement, 2015.
26. Perez, B.E., et al., Does the thickness of the resin cement affect the bondstrength of afiber post to the root dentin? International Journal of Prosthodontics, 2006. 19(6).
27. Boone, K.J., et al., Post retention: the effect of sequence of post-space preparation, cementation time, and different sealers. Journal of Endodontics, 2001. 27.(12): p. 768-771
28. Serafino, C., et al., Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically treated teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 2004. 97(3): p. 381-387.
29. Prado, N.A.S., et al., Influence of the cement film thickness on the push-out bond strength of glass fiber posts cemented in human root canals. International Journal of Dentistry, 2016. 2016.
30. Mirmohammadi, H., et al., Effect of post diameter and cement thickness on bondstrength of fiber posts. Quintessence International, 2013. 44(10).
31. Mendes, M., et al., Long-term bond strength of fiber posts cement to dentin with self-adhesive or conventional resin cements. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 2017. 31(9): p. 977-987.