Author(s): Mohamad Saleem Anis, Mohamed Azmi Hassali

Email(s): saleem.anees@yahoo.com

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00157   

Address: Mohamad Saleem Anis*, Mohamed Azmi Hassali
Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 15,      Issue - 2,     Year - 2022


ABSTRACT:
There are two main purposes for this review, namely: (1) To determine key themes related to pharmaceutical digital marketing that have an impact on non-prescription drug consumers. (2) To identify if there is a knowledge gap in the non-prescription drug digital marketing literature. Four electronic databases were chosen as follows: ScienceDirect (Elsevier), Scopus, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar, to comprehensively cover this broad research scope. A total of 498 studies were found in all databases. After they were thematically sorted, the qualitative synthesis covered 14 studies that were classified under the marketing theme. The results revealed noticeable knowledge gaps in the current literature, where four of the fourteen studies belong to the same author. Additionally, the review indicates the need to conduct further research addressing the pharmaceutical digital marketing topic and its various ramifications.


Cite this article:
Mohamad Saleem Anis, Mohamed Azmi Hassali. Pharmaceutical Digital Marketing of Non-prescription Drugs: A Systematic Scoping Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(2):941-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00157

Cite(Electronic):
Mohamad Saleem Anis, Mohamed Azmi Hassali. Pharmaceutical Digital Marketing of Non-prescription Drugs: A Systematic Scoping Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(2):941-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00157   Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2022-15-2-77


REFERENCES:
1.    Sucharew H, Macaluso M. Progress Notes: Methods for Research Evidence Synthesis: The Scoping Review Approach. Journal of Hospital Medicine. 2019; 14(7): 416-418. doi.org/10.12788/jhm.3248.
2.    Peters MD, et al. Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. International Journal of Evidence-Based Healthcare. 2015; 13(3): 141-146. doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000050.
3.    Tricco AC, et al. A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews. Medical Research Methodology. 2016; 16(15): 1-10. doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0116-4.
4.    Peterson J, et al. Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and process. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. 2017; 29(1): 12-16.
5.    Moher D, et al. All in the family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more. Systematic Reviews. 2015; 4(1): 183-194. doi.org/10.1186/s13643-015-0163-7.
6.    Munn Z, et al. Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2018; 18(143): 1-7. doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x.
7.    Gayakar PP, et al. The survey of knowledge about OTC drugs among pharmacy background and non-pharmacy community. Asian J Pharm Res. 2016; 6(4): 235-241.
8.    Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping Studies: Towards A Methodological Framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. 2005; 8(1): 19-32.
9.    Clarivate Analytics. EndNote X8: Philadelphia, United States. 2018.
10.    Richard M-O, Chandra R. A model of consumer web navigational behavior: conceptual development and application. Journal of Business Research. 2005; 58: 1019-1029. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.04.001.
11.    Back A, Haager C. Assessing Degrees of Web-2.0-ness: Model and Results for Product Websites in the Pharma-Industry. 24th Bled eConference - eFuture: Creating Solutions for the Individual, Organisations and Society; Bled, Slovenia2011. p. 321-334.
12.    Money AG, et al. Public claims about automatic external defibrillators: an online consumer opinions study. BMC Public Health. 2011; 11(332): 1-14.
13.    Ledford CJW, Anderson LN. Online social networking in discussions of risk: applying the CAUSE model in a content analysis of Facebook. Health, Risk and Society. 2013; 15(3): 251-264. doi.org/10.1080/13698575.2013.776016.
14.    Costa TFT. Pharmaceutical marketing and social media: a facebook, twitter and youtube analysis: Universidade dos Açores; 2014.
15.    Roblek V, Bertoncelj A. Impact of corporate social responsibility on OTC medicines consumers. The Amfiteatru Economic. 2014; 16(35): 12-25.
16.    Akhtar N, et al. Perception and impact of social media in pharmaceutical marketing and promotion in Pakistan. Scholars Academic Journal of Pharmacy (SAJP). 2015; 4(1): 54-57.
17.    Powell GE, et al. In their own words: Social listening for “Real-World Benefits” from prescription and OTC products. Value in Health. 2015; 18(3): A86. doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2015.03.504.
18.    Roblek V. Impact of Internet and Social Media on Organizational Change of OTC Medicines Marketing Management. International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing. 2015; 6(3): 239-258. doi.org/10.1504/ijemr.2015.070806.
19.    Roblek V, Meško M, editors. Designing Mobile Application for the Over the Counter Drug Marketing. 2015 ENTRENOVA Conference Proceedings; 2015; Kotor, Montenegro: Innovation Research and Policy Network (IRPN).
20.    Nono A, Popkov I. Ruled by Technology: What effect does eWOM have on purchase decisions when buying OTC pharmaceutical products? : Uppsala University; 2016.
21.    Mkhwanazi N. Influence of Social Media on Consumer Buying Decisions: The Pharmaceutical Industry of South Africa. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand; 2018.
22.    Roblek V, et al. To click or to buy over the counter drugs: exploring the behaviour of Slovenian customers. International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing. 2018; 9(2): 145-166.
23.    Mekawie N, Hany A. Understanding The Factors Driving Consumers’ Purchase Intention of Over The Counter Medications Using Social Media advertising In Egypt:(A Facebook advertising application for cold and Flu products). Procedia Computer Science. 2019; 164: 698-705. doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.12.238.
24.    Sornalakshmi K, et al. A survey on using social media data analytics for pharmacovigilance. Research J Pharm and Tech. 2017; 10(10): 3474-3478. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00621.7.
25.    Darekar A, et al. Current Scenario of Global and Indian Pharmaceutical Marketing and Management. Asian J Res Pharm Sci. 2016; 6(2): 95-100. doi.org/10.5958/2231-5659.2016.00013.8.
26.    Rejikumar G, et al. Pharmaceutical marketing: Directions for customer orientation. Research J Pharm and Tech. 2018; 11(8): 3283-3289. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00604.2.
27.    Khan MY, et al. A Review on Marketing of OTC Drugs. Asian J Res Pharm Sci. 2013; 3(2): 72-78.
28.    Krishnaveni K, et al. A Study of Self Medication Practices among the People in Ernakulam District, Kerala, India. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 11(2): 700-704. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00132.4.
29.    Sharma S, et al. Evaluation of Self Medication amongst Medical Students of Bastar Region: A Questionnaire Based Study. Research Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics. 2014; 6(2): 108-111.
30.    Rathore I. The Prevalence and Pattern of self medication among nursing students in a Private Nursing Institution at Oachghat, Solan (HP) in 2016. Asian J Res Pharm Sci. 2017; 7(3): 125-131. doi.org/10.5958/2231-5659.2017.00020.0.
31.    Haque S, et al. Association between knowledge of self medication and adherence among medical students in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017; 10(5): 1376. doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00245.1.
32.    Kengar MD, et al. Computer-Based Marketing Analysis: A Review. Asian J Pharm Res. 2018; 8(4): 259-266. doi.org/10.5958/2231-5691.2018.00045.X.
33.    Chaurasia V, et al. The Modern Era: Online Pharmacy and Self Medication. Asian J Pharm Tech. 2011; 1(1): 04-08.

Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X 

0.38
2018CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available