Author(s): Pramod Kumar Mahish, Garima Madhariya

Email(s): gmadhariya43@gmail.com

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00768   

Address: Pramod Kumar Mahish, Garima Madhariya*
Department of Biotechnology, Govt. Digvijay Postgraduate College Rajnandgaon, 491441, Chhattisgarh, India.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 17,      Issue - 10,     Year - 2024


ABSTRACT:
Improper wastewater treatment and sanitation processes can negatively affect the environment and public health. Due to the problems with global water shortages, it is essential to take non-conventional water resources into account to facilitate the production of pure fresh water. To provide enough fresh water in the coming decades, wastewater treatment and recycling techniques will be crucial. Due to the limited availability of fresh water and over 70% of it is used for irrigation. Therefore, there is great potential for using recycled water for agricultural irrigation, particularly in cases where minerals like phosphorus and nitrogen are crucial for plant growth. Wetlands are shown to be one of the most suitable treatment options for reusing urban wastewater for irrigation in terms of pollution removal, with high reliability and energy required. Macrophyte species, substrate, hydrology, Surface flow rates, effective food systems, abundance of microorganisms, and temperature all play a role in wetlands ecology and efficiency in waste-water treatment. Organic matter can be effectively removed by constructed wetlands. The result showed that Pistia stratiotes, Alternanthera philoxeroides, Eichhornia crassipes, Polygonum persicaria, Ludwigia adscendens, Marsilea quadrifolia, Nymphoides cristata, and Ipomoea aquatica have the efficiency to reduce BOD up to 86.36%, 77.45%, 88.23%, 76.33%, 77.06%, 77.06%, 81.98%, 83.18%, and 78.26% respectively and COD removed up to 79.3%, 67.5%, 77.98%, 71.29%, 71.6%, 70.86%, 75.4% and 68.2% respectively In present study evaluated that Eichhornia crassipes have higher efficiency for contamination removal as compared to other seven macrophytes.


Cite this article:
Pramod Kumar Mahish, Garima Madhariya. Screening of Macrophytes on the basis of Efficiency of Industrial Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetland. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(10):4995-0. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00768

Cite(Electronic):
Pramod Kumar Mahish, Garima Madhariya. Screening of Macrophytes on the basis of Efficiency of Industrial Wastewater Treatment in Constructed Wetland. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2024; 17(10):4995-0. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00768   Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2024-17-10-53


REFERENCES:
1.    Thangavel K. Waste Water Treatment Via Constructed Wetland. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2017; 10(9): 3107-8.
2.    Falahi OA, Abdullah SR, Hasan HA, Othman AR, Ewadh HM, Al-Baldawi IA, Kurniawan SB, Imron MF. Simultaneous removal of ibuprofen, organic material, and nutrients from domestic wastewater through a pilot-scale vertical sub-surface flow constructed wetland with aeration system. Journal of Water Process Engineering. 2021; Oct 1; 43: 102214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102214.
3.    Gikas P, Ranieri E, Tchobanoglous G. Removal of iron, chromium and lead from waste water by horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology. 2013; Oct; 88(10): 1906-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4048
4.    Collison RS, Grismer ME. Nitrogen and Chemical Oxygen Demand removal from septic tank wastewater in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: Substrate (Cation Exchange Capacity) effects. Water Environment Research. 2014; Apr; 86(4): 314-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2175/106143013X13736496908627 .
5.    Ranieri E, Gikas P, Tchobanoglous G. BTEX removal in pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Desalination and Water Treatment. 2013; Mar 1; 51(13-15): 3032-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2012.748453
6.    Torrens A, Bayona C, Salgot M, Folch M. Performance, design and operation of hybrid subsurface flow constructed wetland for swine slurry treatment. In15th IWA International Conference on Wetland Systems for Water Pollution Control, Gdańsk, Poland 2016; (1044-1045).
7.    Kumar SN, Muralidhara PL, Hiremath L, Swathi PR. A Recent Advancement on Treatment Technologies for Handling of Pharma Waste water. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13(4): 1981-6.
8.    Srivastava AK, Gupta AK, Mehrotra T, Choudhury R, Singh R. Physicochemical, biochemical and statistical analysis of beverages industry effluent. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2016; 9(7): 887-92.
9.    Aammouri SE, Benlemlih N, Mohammed IB. Wastewater treatment by infiltration percolation process using fine sand and activated carbon. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(12): 5722-7.
10.    Alzurfi SK, Alasadi K, Alausawi SA. Assessment of Water Quality Status of Euphrates from Hindiya dam to Mishkab Regulator-Iraq. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 11(1): 09-16.
11.    Ávila C, Bayona JM, Martín I, Salas JJ, García J. Emerging organic contaminant removal in a full-scale hybrid constructed wetland system for wastewater treatment and reuse. Ecological Engineering. 2015; Jul 1; 80: 108-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.07.056
12.    Jehawi OH, Abdullah SR, Kurniawan SB, Ismail NI, Idris M, Al Sbani NH, Muhamad MH, Hasan HA. Performance of pilot Hybrid Reed Bed constructed wetland with aeration system on nutrient removal for domestic wastewater treatment. Environmental Technology and Innovation. 2020; Aug 1; 19: 100891. doi:10.1016/j.eti.2020.100891.
13.    Kumari M, Tripathi BD. Effect of aeration and mixed culture of Eichhornia crassipes and Salvinia natans on removal of wastewater pollutants. Ecological Engineering. 2014; Jan 1; 62: 48-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.10.007.
14.    Seeger EM, Maier U, Grathwohl P, Kuschk P, Kaestner M. Performance evaluation of different horizontal subsurface flow wetland types by characterization of flow behavior, mass removal and depth-dependent contaminant load. Water research. 2013; Feb 1; 47(2): 769-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.10.051.
15.    Bruun J, Pugliese L, Hoffmann CC, Kjaergaard C. Solute transport and nitrate removal in full-scale subsurface flow constructed wetlands of various designs treating agricultural drainage water. Ecological Engineering. 2016; Dec 1; 97: 88-97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.07.010.  
16.    Bruch I, Fritsche J, Bänninger D, Alewell U, Sendelov M, Hürlimann H, Hasselbach R, Alewell C. Improving the treatment efficiency of constructed wetlands with zeolite-containing filter sands. Bioresource technology. 2011; Jan 1; 102(2): 937-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.09.041
17.    Jácome JA, Molina J, Suárez J, Mosqueira G, Torres D. Performance of constructed wetland applied for domestic wastewater treatment: Case study at Boimorto (Galicia, Spain). Ecological Engineering. 2016; Oct 1; 95: 324-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.049.
18.    Omar HJ, Siti R, Idris M, Nurina A, Hassimi AH, Nadya HA, Nur'izzati I. A reed bed system for the treatment of domestic wastewater and micropollutants. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences. 2014; 8(19 Special):280-3.
19.    Kadlec RH, Wallace S. Treatment wetlands. CRC press; 2008 Jul 22.
20.    Al-Zurfi SK, Alisaw AY, Al-Shafai GA. Bioaccumulation of some heavy metals by the aquatic plant lemnagibba in vitro. research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 11(10): 4229-36.
21.    Maine MA, Sune N, Hadad H, Sánchez G, Bonetto C. Nutrient and metal removal in a constructed wetland for wastewater treatment from a metallurgic industry. ecological engineering. 2006; Jul 31; 26(4): 341-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.12.004
22.    Jain P, Andotra A, Aziz A, Kaur P, Mahajan A, Kumar A. Phytoremediation-a miracle technique for waste water treatment. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019; 12(4): 2009-16.
23.    Sinha P. Phytoremediation techniques. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(11): 5359-62.
24.    Brix H. Functions of macrophytes in constructed wetlands. Water Science and Technology. 1994; Feb 1; 29(4): 71-8. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1994.0160.
25.    Verma R, Suthar S. Performance assessment of horizontal and vertical surface flow constructed wetland system in wastewater treatment using multivariate principal component analysis. Ecological engineering. 2018; Jun 1; 116: 121-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2018.02.022
26.    Shutes RB. Artificial wetlands and water quality improvement. Environment international. 2001; May 1; 26(5-6): 441-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(01)00025-3
27.    Chauhan RK, Chhipa RC, Bansal AK, Sharma DK, Gupta YK. Physico-chemical evaluation of water Quality parameters of Chambal River in Kota, Rajasthan, India. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13(7): 3402-8.
28.    Pant R, Gupta A, Kukreti S, Kaur H, Dhyani N, Rohilla B, Patrick N. Microbiological and physico-chemical quality assessment of drinking water in Dehradun. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2023; 16(1): 266-72.
29.    American Public Health Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association.; 1926.
30.    Manohar DM, Shyaam LP. Survey of aquatic macrophyte diversity in Yavatmal district, Maharashtra, India. Int. J. of life sciences. 2014; Sep; 2(3): 273-5.
31.    Jain SK, Rao RR. A handbook of field and herbarium methods.
32.    Nath SK. Aquatic macrophytes of Laokhowa wildlife sanctuary, Assam, India. Int. J. Eng. Res. App. 2012; Sep; 2: 1911-3.
33.    Sehar S, Naeem S, Perveen I, Ali N, Ahmed S. A comparative study of macrophytes influence on wastewater treatment through subsurface flow hybrid constructed wetland. Ecological Engineering. 2015; Aug 1; 81: 62-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.04.009
34.    Rameshkumar S, Radhakrishnan K, Aanand S, Rajaram R. Influence of physicochemical water quality on aquatic macrophyte diversity in seasonal wetlands. Applied Water Science. 2019; Feb; 9: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-018-0888-2.
35.    Tank SK, Chippa RC. Analysis of water quality of Halena block in Bharatpur area. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2013; Mar; 3(3): 57-62.
36.    Singh RP, Mathur P. Investigation of physico-chemical characteristics of freshwater reservoir of Ajmer city Rajasthan. Indian J Environ Sci. 2005; 19: 179-86.
37.    Jalal FN, Sanalkumar MG. Hydrology and water quality assessment of Achencovil river in relation to pilgrimage season. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 2012; Dec; 2(12): 1-5.
38.    Dwivedi BK, Pandey GC. Physico-chemical factors and algal diversity of two ponds (girija kund and maqubara pond), Faizabad, India. Pollution Research. 2002; 21(3): 361-70.
39.    Sawyer CN, McCARTY PL. Chemistry for environmental engineering. (No Title). 1978 Dec.
40.    Garcha S, Verma N, Brar SK. Isolation, characterization and identification of microorganisms from unorganized dairy sector wastewater and sludge samples and evaluation of their biodegradability. Water resources and industry. 2016; Dec 1; 16: 19-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wri.2016.10.002
41.    Tchobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel HD. Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse, Metcalf & Eddy Inc. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 2003. doi. 2003;10:0070418780.
42.    Mukherjee B, Majumdar M, Gangopadhyay A, Chakraborty S, Chaterjee D. Phytoremediation of parboiled rice mill wastewater using water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes). International journal of phytoremediation. 2015; Jul 3; 17(7): 651-6. doi:10.1080/15226514.2014.950415.


Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.5958/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Journal Policies & Information


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available