Author(s): Aisha Khallouf, Yaser Bitar, Saleh Trefi, Ali Ibrahim

Email(s): khalloufaisha@gmail.com

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00377   

Address: Aisha Khallouf1*, Yaser Bitar1, Saleh Trefi1, Ali Ibrahim2
1Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry and Quality Control, Faculty of Pharmacy, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria.
2Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Aleppo University, Aleppo, Syria.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 19,      Issue - 6,     Year - 2026


ABSTRACT:
This research aimed to develop and validate a simple, precise, accurate, sensitive, and low- cost microbiological assay using a one-level agar diffusion method (5+1) to determine the potency and biological activity of cefotaxime sodium in its pharmaceutical formulations not previously mentioned in any pharmacopeia or previous studies, and to use this validated method to evaluate the microbiological equivalence in vitro of cefotaxime sodium formulations. Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC-13885) strains exhibiting the highest sensitivity to cefotaxime sodium were selected. Several factors influencing the microbiological assay were optimized, including the standard solution concentration, incubation temperature and duration, the buffer pH, and the bacterial suspension concentration. The method validation results were satisfactory for linearity (R2=0.996), accuracy (99.4%), precision (repeatability RSD 1.47%, intermediate precision RSD 1.79%), and robustness (RSD ?2%). Five local commercial preparations and a brand preparation of cefotaxime sodium were assayed using the developed microbiological method. Their potencies ranged from 94.93% to 103.03%. One-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between the local commercial preparations and a brand preparation, with the brand preparation exhibiting the highest potency at 103.03%. The developed microbiological assay could be applied in pharmaceutical quality control laboratories to determine cefotaxime sodium in its pharmaceutical formulations and to assess the in vitro microbiological equivalence of commercial preparations. To resolve the ongoing debate in the Syrian medical community regarding the interchangeability between local preparations and the brand preparation, since all preparations were within the acceptable range, local commercial preparations can be considered a cost-effective and efficacious alternative to the brand preparation.


Cite this article:
Aisha Khallouf, Yaser Bitar, Saleh Trefi, Ali Ibrahim. Development and Validation of a Microbiological assay for the Determination of Cefotaxime Sodium and its Application to Study the In vitro Microbiological Equivalence of its Local and Brand Pharmaceutical Preparations. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(6):2636-2. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00377

Cite(Electronic):
Aisha Khallouf, Yaser Bitar, Saleh Trefi, Ali Ibrahim. Development and Validation of a Microbiological assay for the Determination of Cefotaxime Sodium and its Application to Study the In vitro Microbiological Equivalence of its Local and Brand Pharmaceutical Preparations. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(6):2636-2. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00377   Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2026-19-6-34


REFERENCES:
1.    Consortti LP, Salgado HRN. A critical review of analytical methods for quantification of cefotaxime. Crit Rev Anal Chem. 2017; 47(4): 359–71. doi:10.1080/10408347.2017.1298988
2.    Whalen K. Lippincott® Illustrated Reviews: Pharmacology. New Delhi: Wolters Kluwer India Pvt Ltd; 2018.
3.    El-Adl SM, El M, Hassan MH. HPLC Determination of Two Cephalosporines with one Macrolide in Bulk and Dosage Forms. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2014; 4(4): 180-185.
4.    Brayfield A. Martindale: The complete drug reference. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2017.
5.    United States Pharmacopeia 46, National Formulary 41. Cefotaxime for Injection. Rockville, MD: United States Pharmacopeial Convention Inc; 2023. Available from: https://doi.usp.org/USPNF/USPNF_M14087_04_01.html
6.    Shinde KP, Rajmane AD. A Review UV Method Development and Validation. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2023; 13(2): 122-130. doi:https://doi.org/10.52711/2231-5675.2023.00021
7.    Koli RS, Patel AS, Chaudhari KN, Patil KR. A Review on HPLC and Its New Trends. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2018; 8(4): 233. doi:https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-5675.2018.00042.x
8.    Baird RM, Hodges NA, Denyer SP. Handbook of microbiological quality control in pharmaceuticals and medical devices. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2019.
9.    Sandle T. Pharmaceutical microbiology: Essentials for quality assurance and quality control. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2016.
10.    Council of Europe. European Pharmacopoeia. 7th ed. Strasbourg: EDQM; 2013.
11.    Nair A, Chandrashekhar HR, Nayak UY. RP-HPLC method for quantification of cefotaxime sodium using design of experiment: a green analytical approach. J Appl Pharm Sci. 2024. doi:10.7324/JAPS.2024.192430
12.    Anwer ET, Porwal O, Dudhe R. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for estimation of cefotaxime sodium. Res J Pharm Technol. 2022; 15(7): 3114–8. doi:10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00521
13.    Sarsam LA, Mohammed SA, Fathe SA. Spectrophotometric and RP-HPLC methods for determining cefotaxime sodium. Asian J Chem. 2020; 32(6): 1314–20. doi:10.14233/ajchem.2020.22524
14.    Al-Hakkani MF. HPLC analytical method validation for determination of cefotaxime. Sustain Chem Eng. 2020; 1(1): 33–42. doi:10.37256/sce.112020199.33-42
15.    Ling SSN, Yuen KH, Barker SA. Liquid chromatographic method for cefotaxime in plasma. J Chromatogr B. 2003; 783(1): 297–301. doi:10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00657-8
16.    Esra Tariq Anwer, Omji Porwal, Rupesh Dudhe. Development and validation of RP-HPLC method for estimation of Cefotaxime sodium in bulk and formulation. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(7): 3114-8. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00521
17.    El-Adl SM, El-Shanawany AA, Abdel-Aziz LM, Hassan AF. HPLC Determination of Three Cephalosporins (Cefepime, Cefotriaxone and Cefotaxime) in Their Bulk and Dosage Forms. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2014; 4(3): 91-97.
18.    El-Adl SM, El M, Hassan MH. HPLC Determination of Cefepime, Cefotaxime and Cefoperazone in Bulk and Dosage Forms. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2014; 4(4): 168-173.
19.    Sayed R, Hassan W, El-Mammli M, Shalaby A. Spectrophotometric method for cefotaxime sodium and cefoperazone. Am Chem Sci J. 2013; 3(4): 514–25. doi:10.9734/ACSJ/2013/5572
20.    Bagheri Gh A, Rad AY, Rezvani M, Roshanzamir S. Complexation of cephalosporins with Pd(II). Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2012; 89: 317–21. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2012.01.002
21.    Kumar CHA, BM G, Sloka SN. Determination of cefadroxil, ceftriaxone and cefotaxime using NBS. Int J Res Pharm Sci. 2011; 2(2): 206–12.
22.    Sayed RA, Hassan WS, El-Mammli MY, Shalaby AA. Extractive spectrophotometric method for gatifloxacin and cefotaxime sodium. Orient J Chem. 2012; 28(2): 639–50. doi:10.13005/ojc/280203
23.    Rageh AH, El-Shaboury SR, Saleh GA, Mohamed FA. Determination of cephalosporins using NBD-Cl. Nat Sci. 2010;2(8):828–40. doi:10.4236/ns.2010.28104
24.    Abood NK. Spectroscopic estimation of cefotaxime using eco-friendly method. J Phys Conf Ser. 2021; 1853(1): 012023. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1853/1/012023
25.    Sobhy M. El-Adl, Mohamed El. Hossinny El. Sadek , Marwa Hamdy Hassan. Spectrophotometric Investigations on Cephalosporines by Ellman’s Reagent in Bulk and Dosage Forms. Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2014; 4(4): 196-201.
26.    S. et al. Indirect spectrofluorometric method for cefotaxime sodium. Baghdad Sci J. 2020; 17(1): 0066. doi:10.21123/bsj.2020.17.1.0066
27.    Rajia S, Fujii Y, Kawsar MA, Ozeki Y, Jahan MdS, Hasan I. Effectiveness of microbiological assays to determine antibiotic potency: A review. Hacettepe Univ J Fac Pharm. 2024; 44(2): 153–64. doi:10.52794/hujpharm.1354419
28.    Kar A. Pharmaceutical microbiology. New Delhi: New Age International Pvt Ltd; 2007.
29.    Oliveira SS, Barbosa FDS, Pezzi LC, Schapoval EES, Mendez ASL. Microbiological assay for imipenem. Drug Anal Res. 2018;2(2):8–13. doi:10.22456/2527-2616.87344
30.    Dafale NA, Semwal UP, Agarwal PK, Sharma P, Singh GN. Microbial bioassay for levofloxacin. J Pharm Anal. 2015; 5(1): 18–26. doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2014.07.007
31.    Lourenco FR, Augusto M, Okamoto RT, Andreoli J. Microbiological assay for ceftriaxone and photo-stability study. Curr Pharm Anal. 2013; 9(1): 77–81. doi:10.2174/157341213804806052
32.    Saber A, Elkady F, Ashour M. Microbiological evaluation of antimicrobial potency in Egyptian products. Azhar Int J Pharm Med Sci. 2023; 0(0). doi:10.21608/aijpms.2023.171015.1176
33.    Martins YA, Sousa RS, Oliveira CLCG. Microbiological agar assay for thiamphenicol. Curr Pharm Anal. 2019;15. doi:10.2174/1573412915666190328213828
34.    Schmidt CA, Agarrayua DA, Laporta LV, et al. Agar assay for cefuroxime sodium. J Microbiol Methods. 2009; 77(3): 308–15. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2009.03.012
35.    Cazedey ECL, Salgado HRN. Microbiological assay for orbifloxacin. Pharmaceutics. 2011; 3(3): 572–81. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics3030572
36.    J Vanitha, Kumar AS, Ganesh M, VS Saravanan. Comparative analysis of Climbazole in Pharmaceutical Formulation. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2008; 1(1): 43-45.
37.    Avianto P, Alderman CP. In vitro equivalence of generic and branded amoxicillin. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2020; 30(6). doi:10.1515/jbcpp-2019-0247
38.    Diaz JA, Silva E, Arias MJ, Garzón M. Comparative study of vancomycin products. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2011; 11(1). doi:10.1186/1472-6904-11-9
39.    Zuluaga AF, Agudelo M, Rodriguez CA, Vesga O. Microbiological assay for IV antibiotics. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2009; 9(1). doi:10.1186/1472-6904-9-1
40.    Rukhsana A Rub, Aaisha Sagri, Vandana Joshi, Jasmin Momin, Nusrat Shaikh. Evaluation of Antimicrobial Potency and Synergistic Activity of Nine Traditionally Used Indian Medicinal Plants. Research J. Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2010; 2(2): 131-135.
41.    Shingote V, Mankar SD, Dighe SB. A Review Article on Analytical Methods Development and Validation. Research Journal of Science and Technology. 2022; 14(1): 77-83. doi:https://doi.org/10.52711/2349-2988.2022.00012

Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Journal Policies & Information


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available