Author(s): Olivia Nauli Komala, Florencia Livia Kurniawan, Octarina, Syifa Ratnaya Safina, Kelly Nissan Ng, Fadila Rahmania

Email(s): olivia.nauli@trisakti.ac.id

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00396   

Address: Olivia Nauli Komala1*, Florencia Livia Kurniawan2, Octarina2, Syifa Ratnaya Safina3, Kelly Nissan Ng3, Fadila Rahmania3
1Department of Periodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Tomang, Grogol Petamburan 11440, Jakarta, Indonesia.
2Departement of Dental Material, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Tomang, Grogol Petamburan 11440, Jakarta, Indonesia.
3Professional Program in Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Tomang, Grogol Petamburan 11440, Jakarta, Indonesia.
*Corresponding Author

Published In:   Volume - 19,      Issue - 6,     Year - 2026


ABSTRACT:
Composite bone grafts combining demineralized bone matrix (DBM), hydroxyapatite (HA), and calcium sulfate (CS) had the potential to overcome the limitations of individual materials by integrating osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and resorbable properties. However, studies involving all three components together remained limited. This study aimed to develop and analyze composite bone grafts composed of DBM, HA, and CS in different ratios (1:1:1, 1:2:1, and 1:3:1), focusing on their surface morphology, elemental composition, and calcium ion concentration. The composites were prepared by freeze-drying the mixed materials and analyzed using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) for surface morphology, Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) for elemental composition, and Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS) for calcium ion concentration. Statistical analysis was conducted using One-Way ANOVA and Tamhane’s post-hoc test. SEM analysis revealed that the 1:3:1 ratio sample exhibited the lowest porosity and most uniform particle distribution. EDS analysis confirmed the presence of calcium, phosphorus, oxygen, and carbon as the major elements. AAS results showed significant differences in calcium ion concentration across groups, with the highest concentration in the CS sample (227.85 mg/L) and decreasing levels in the composite groups, from 190.65 mg/L (1:1:1) to 77.45 mg/L (1:3:1). The findings indicate that higher HA content reduces calcium ion release due to its low solubility, which may help maintain ion concentrations within optimal limits for osteogenesis. The surface morphology and elemental composition suggest good biocompatibility and support for cell attachment and differentiation. Composite grafts combining DBM, HA, and CS exhibited favorable surface characteristics and controlled calcium ion release, making them promising candidates for bone regeneration applications. The 1:3:1 ratio, in particular, offers balanced properties suitable for supporting osteogenic activity.


Cite this article:
Olivia Nauli Komala, Florencia Livia Kurniawan, Octarina, Syifa Ratnaya Safina, Kelly Nissan Ng, Fadila Rahmania. Analysis of Surface Morphology, Elemental Composition and Calcium Ion Concentration in Calcium-Based Graft Combinations with Demineralized Bone Matrix. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(6):2775-0. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00396

Cite(Electronic):
Olivia Nauli Komala, Florencia Livia Kurniawan, Octarina, Syifa Ratnaya Safina, Kelly Nissan Ng, Fadila Rahmania. Analysis of Surface Morphology, Elemental Composition and Calcium Ion Concentration in Calcium-Based Graft Combinations with Demineralized Bone Matrix. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(6):2775-0. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00396   Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2026-19-6-53


REFERENCES: 
1.    Fesseha H, Fesseha Y. Bone Grafting, Its Principle and Application: A Review. Osteol Rheumatol Open J. 2020; 1(1): 43-50.
2.    Kumar P, Belliappa V, Ghousia F. Bone grafts in dentistry. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013;5(Suppl 1): S125-S127.
3.    Roldan L, Isaza C, Ospina J, et al. A Comparative Study of HA/DBM Compounds Derived from Bovine and Porcine for Bone Regeneration. J Funct Biomater. 2023; 14(439): 1-17.
4.    Chen I-C, Su C-Y, Lai C-C, Tsou Y-S, Zheng Y, Fang H-W. Preparation and characterization of moldable demineralized bone matrix/calcium sulfate composite bone graft materials. J Funct Biomater. 2021;12(4):1-15.
5.    Wang S, Liu J, Caroprese M, Gianfreda F, Melloni F, De Santis D. Exploring the potential of calcium-based biomaterials for bone regeneration in dentistry: a systematic review. Minerva Dent Oral Sci. 2023; 72: 1-22.
6.    Gani MA, Budiatin AS, Shinta DW, Ardianto C, Khotib J. Bovine hydroxyapatite-based scaffold accelerated the inflammatory phase and bone growth in rats with bone defect. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2023; 21: 1-12.
7.    Zhang H, Yang L, Yang X, et al. Demineralized Bone Matrix Carriers and their Clinical Applications: An Overview. Orthop Surg. 2019; 11: 725-737.
8.    Wang W, Yeung KW. Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review. Bioact Mater. 2017; 2(4): 224-247.
9.    Dadgar N, Ghiaseddin A, Irani S, et al. Cartilage Tissue Engineering Using Injectable Functionalized Demineralized Bone Matrix Scaffold with Glucosamine in PVA Carrier, Cultured in Microbioreactor Prior to Study in Rabbit Model. Mater Sci Eng C. 2021; 120: 1-10.
10.    Gabriel AP. Comparative Osteogenesis of Three Clinical Bone Graft Materials: An In Vivo Study. Published online 2022.
11.    McLean JB, Carter N, Sohoni P, Moore MA. Cell Attachment and Osteoinductive Properties of Tissue Engineered, Demineralized Bone Fibers for Bone Void Filling Applications. In: Clinical Implementation of Bone Regeneration and Maintenance. Intechopen. Published online 2019.
12.    Proudfoot D. Calcium Signaling and Tissue Calcification. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2019; 11: 1-21.
13.    Khosropanah H, Lashkarizadeh N, Ayatollahi M, Kaviani M, Mostafavipour. The Impact of Calcium Hydroxide on the Osteoinductive Capacity of Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft: an In-Vitro Study. J Dent. 2018; 19(1): 19-27.
14.    Hou X, Zhang L, Zhou Z, et al. Calcium Phosphate-Based Biomaterials for Bone Repair. J Funct Biomater. 2022; 13(4): 1-39.
15.    Machtei EE, Mayer Y, Horwitz J, Giladi HZ. Prospective randomized controlled clinical trial to compare hard tissue changes following socket preservation using alloplasts, xenografts vs no grafting: Clinical and histological findings. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019; 21(1): 14-20.
16.    Suprianto K, Hidayati, Nilam C, Khairiyah N, Amelia R, Rahmadita S. Hidroksiapatit dari cangkang telur sebagai bone graft yang potensial dalam terapi periodontal. MKGK (Majalah Kedokt Gigi Klin. 2019; 5(3): 76-87.
17.    Kribaa OK, Zenkhri L, Boutarfaia A, Benamour L, Chahbaoui N. Elaboration and Physicochemical characterization of a Biomaterial for Bone Substitution. Asian J Res Chem. 2022; 15(1): 71-76.
18.    Girija C, Sivakumar MN. Amalgamation and Characterization of Hydroxyapatite Powders from Eggshell for Functional Biomedical Application. Res J Pharm Tech. 2018; 11(10): 4242-4244.
19.    Singh S, Pal A, Mohanty S. Nano Structure of Hydroxyapatite and its modern approach in Pharmaceutical Science. Res J Pharm Tech. 2019; 12(3): 1463-1472.
20.    Panneerselvam R, Anandhan N, Ganesan KP, Marimuthu T, Paneerdoss IJ. Effect of Concentration on Nano Hydroxyapatite Powder by Wet Chemical Precipitation Route. Asian J Res Chem. 2018; 11(3): 545-550.
21.    Perdana S, Prahasanti C, Bargowo L, Prasetyo S, Riawan W. The Analysis of MMP-13 Expression on Hydroxyapatite Tooth Graft Application Compared to Hydroxyapatite Xenograft. Res J Pharm Tech. 2023; 16(1): 261-265.
22.    Kamadjaja MJK, Salim S, Subiakto BDS. Application of Hydroxyapatite scaffold from Portunus pelagicus on OPG and RANKL expression after tooth extraction of Cavia cobaya. Res J Pharm Tech. 2021; 14(9): 4647-4651.
23.    Supandi SK, Susilahati NLDA, Lubna, Rezkika YF, Krismariono A, Maduratna E. Micro Hydroxyapatite in Bone Regeneration: A Literature Review. Res J Pharm Tech. 2024; 17(2): 591-594.
24.    Pereira MFA. Advances Using Hydroxyapatite as a Biomaterial in Bone Regeneration. Published online 2014.
25.    Forouzanfar A, Radvar M, Shayesteh E, Mohammadipour HS. Clinical assessment of a synthetic biomaterial containing hydroxyapatite and beta tricalcium phosphate in socket preservation. Res J Pharm Tech. 2022; 15(11): 5126-5131.
26.    Santoso HA, Eddy. Potensi Penggunaan β-Tricalcium Phosphate Sebagai Bahan Substansi Tulang. JKGT. 2023; 5(1): 54-57.
27.    Haris MS, Budiatin AS, Rahmadi M, Aryani T, Ramadhaniar M. Fabrication and Characterization of Bone Graft Nano Bovine Hydroxyapatite-Gelatine-Calcium Sulfate: A Top-Down approach for a Natural Biomaterial. Res J Pharm Tech. 2025; 18(1): 326-332.
28.    Zhao R, Yang R, Cooper PR, Khurshid Z, Shavandi A, Ratnayake J. Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments. Molecules. 2021; 26(10): 1-27.
29.    Russell N, Walsh WR, Lovric V, et al. In-vivo Performance of Seven Commercially Available Demineralized Bone Matrix Fiber and Putty Products in a Rat Posterolateral Fusion Model. Front Surg. 2020; 7(10): 1-11.
30.    Dhruvakumar D, Gupta C. Role of combination therapy/composite graft in periodontal regeneration: A mini review. Tanta Dent J. 2017; 14(4): 169-172.
31.    Kurniawan NA, Sofyan E, Setiawan F. Pengujian Tarik Komposit Spesimen Campuran Serat Pisang Alur Diagonal dan Pasir Besi Dengan Matrik Resin Polyester Dengan Metode Hand Lay-Up. Tek STTKD J Tek Elektron Engine. 2022; 8(2): 281-288.
32.    Driscoll JA, Lubbe R, Jakus AE, et al. 3D-Printed Ceramic-Demineralized Bone Matrix Hyperelastic Bone Composite Scaffolds for Spinal Fusion. Tissue Eng Regen Med Int Soc. 2020; 26(3 and 4): 157-166.
33.    Alarcón-Apablaza J, Navarro P, Céspedes MCM, Fuentes R. Analysis of the Chemical Composition, Morphological Characterization, and Porosimetry of Allograft and Comparison with Xenograft for Dental Application. Int J Morphol. 2024; 42(3): 698-708.
34.    Wijaya MG, Prahasanti C, Laksono BD, Agrawanty W, Kusumawardhani B, Anggakusuma MJ. Viability Test of Hydroxyapatite Tooth Graft on Osteoblast cell culture. Res J Pharm Tech. 2024; 17(2): 855-859.
35.    Khamvongsa M, Milton K, Faisal TR. Mechanical characterization of low-cost 3D FDM printed scaffolds fabricated with synthesized PLA/HA bio-composite filament. Ann 3D Print Med. 2025; 18: 1-10.
36.    Xu T. Development of 3D engineered scaffolds with triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) structure for bone tissue repair. Published online 2024.
37.    Lestari DR, Mahanani ES. Perbedaan profil degradasi perancah koral buatan berbagai konsentrasi pada medium kultur sel. Published online 2014.
38.    Andya S, Rahman SF, Basari. Karakterisasi fisika-kimia dari perancah berbahan dasar karbon/hidroksiapatit/fibrin untuk mempercepat regenerasi tulang. Published online 2022.
39.    Bernado P, Rahardjo, Rahajoe PS. Pengaruh Recombinant Human Erythropoietin Terhadap Jumlah Osteoblas, Osteoklas, dan Kadar Hemoglobin pada Penyembuhan Fraktur Tulang Mandibula Studi Eksperimental pada Fraktur Mandibula Tikus Sprague-Dawley. J Kedokt Gigi. 2016; 7(2): 131-137.
40.    Soraya S, Budiman AW, Purwanto A. Prarancangan Pabrik Kalsium Sulfat Dihidrat (Gipsum) dari Kalsium Oksida dan Asam Sulfat Kapasitas 320.000 Ton/Tahun. Published online 2018.
41.    Berberi A, Samarani A, Nader N, et al. Physicochemical characteristics of bone substitutes used in oral surgery in comparison to autogenous bone. Biomed Res Int. Published online 2014:1-9.
42.    Han Y. High concentrations of calcium suppress osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells in vitro. J Dent Sci. 2021;16:817-824.
43.    Kuzmenka D, Sewohl C, König A, et al. Sustained calcium(II)-release to impart bioactivity in hybrid glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Pharm 2. 2020; 12(12): 1-27.
44.    Hao Y, Yang N, Sun M, Yang S, Chen X. The role of calcium channels in osteoporosis and their therapeutic potential. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15(1-11).
45.    Saulacic N, Fujioka-Kobayashi M, Kimura Y, Bracher AI, Zihlmann C, Lang NP. The effect of synthetic bone graft substitutes on bone formation in rabbit calvarial defects. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2021; 32(14): 1-13.
46.    Doyan B, Cohen D, Schwartz Z. Synthetic bone graft substitutes: basic information for successful clinical use. In: Bone Graft Substitutes and Bone Regenerative Engineering. 2nd ed. ASTM International; 2014: 219-250.
47.    Haris A, Fadli A, Yenti SR. Sintesis hidroksiapatit dari limbah tulang sapi menggunakan metode presipitasi dengan variasi rasio Ca/P dan konsentrasi H3PO4. JOM FTEKNIK. 2016; 3(2): 1-10.


Recomonded Articles:

Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology (RJPT) is an international, peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal.... Read more >>>

RNI: CHHENG00387/33/1/2008-TC                     
DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X 

1.3
2021CiteScore
 
56th percentile
Powered by  Scopus


SCImago Journal & Country Rank

Journal Policies & Information


Recent Articles




Tags


Not Available