Author(s):
Meghna B. Jayakar, Shruthi Subhash
Email(s):
shruthi.subhash@nmims.edu
DOI:
10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00398
Address:
Meghna B. Jayakar1, Shruthi Subhash1,2*
1Mukesh Patel School of Technology Management and Engineering, SVKMs NMIMS, Mumbai - 400056, Maharashtra, India.
2Institute of Chemical Technology, Matunga, Mumbai - 400019, Maharashtra, India.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 19,
Issue - 6,
Year - 2026
ABSTRACT:
Graph-based approaches in bioinformatics and biotechnology provide valuable insights into complex biological systems. Building on prior research comparing co-expression and protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks in S. cerevisiae, we construct an intersection graph and analyze common genes using R. First, we examine the structural properties of the PPI graph, analyzing its degree distribution and identifying connected components. Most subgraphs are singletons; however we visualize communities present in the third and seventh components, to reveal genes crucial for maintaining cellular functions. Next, the network analysis reveals thirty clusters of genes, forming sub- graphs that are internally connected but disjoint from one another. Pairs of genes with both PPI and shared expression cluster membership are identified. Cohesive subgroups within the intersection graph highlight 2-cliques, with at least four genes linked to DNA replication and polymerases, which are responsible for maintaining genomic integrity during cell division. Finally, we assess centrality measures within the intersection graph, identifying top ten genes ranked by degree, betweenness, closeness and eigenvector centrality to understand the importance of individual nodes which may be involved in cellular and genomic stability, as well as global cellular functions. This study demonstrates how graph-theoretical methods can aid in identifying biologically relevant genes. We conclude by discussing the broader implications of this study for bioinformatics and biotechnology, emphasizing the importance of genomic stability and the challenges of modeling dynamic molecular networks using graph-based methods.
Cite this article:
Meghna B. Jayakar, Shruthi Subhash. Graph Theoretical Insights into the Genomic Integrity of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(6):2785-3. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00398
Cite(Electronic):
Meghna B. Jayakar, Shruthi Subhash. Graph Theoretical Insights into the Genomic Integrity of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(6):2785-3. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00398 Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2026-19-6-55
REFERENCES:
1. Ashton B. Graph theory in DNA sequencing: Unveiling genetic patterns. International Journal of Biology and Life Sciences. 2023; 3(1): 9-13. doi.org/10.54097/ijbls.v3i1.9593.
2. Centre for Genome Stability - The Institute of Cancer Research, London. https://www.icr.ac.uk/research-and-discoveries/royal-marsden-centres/centre-for-genome-stability.
3. Choi EH, Yoon S, Koh YE, et al. Maintenance of genome integrity and active homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Experimental and Molecular Medicine. 2020; 52: 1220-1229. doi.org/10.1038/s12276-020-0481-2.
4. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Genome.gov. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Deoxyribonucleic-Acid.
5. Finocchiaro G, Mancuso FM, Cittaro D, Muller H. Graph-based identification of cancer signaling pathways from published gene expression signatures using PubLiME. Nucleic Acids Research. 2007; 35(7): 2343-2355. doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkm119.
6. Gene. Genome.gov. 2024. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Gene.
7. Genome Integrity and Repair. Crick Institute. 2024 Jul 9. https://www.crick.ac.uk/research/research-topics/genome-integrity-repair.
8. Genome integrity. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. 2024. https://www.mskcc.org/research-areas/topics/genome-integrity.
9. Genome. Genome.gov. https://www.genome.gov/genetics-glossary/Genome.
10. Goedhart J, van Weeren L, Adjobo-Hermans MJ, Elzenaar I, Hink MA, et al. Quantitative co-expression of proteins at the single cell level – application to a multimeric FRET sensor. PLOS ONE. 2011; 6(11):e27321. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027321.
11. Gogoshin G, Rodin AS. Graph neural networks in cancer and oncology research: Emerging and future trends. Cancers. 2023; 15(24):5858. doi.org/10.3390/cancers15245858.
12. Huber W, Carey VJ, Long L, et al. Graphs in molecular biology. BMC Bioinformatics. 2007; 8(Suppl 6):S8. doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-S6-S8.
13. Kanonidis EI, Roy MM, Deighton RF, Le Bihan T. Protein co-expression analysis as a strategy to complement a standard quantitative proteomics approach: Case of a glioblastoma multiforme study. PLOS One. 2016; 11(8):e0161828. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161828.
14. Khaciyants ILA. Graph neural networks in bioinformatics. Implementation of graph neural networks in drug discovery research. Serokell Blog. 2024 May 21. https://serokell.io/blog/graph-neural-networks-in-bioinformatics.
15. Koh GCKW, Porras P, Aranda B, Hermjakob H, Orchard SE. Analyzing protein–protein interaction networks. Journal of Proteome Research. 2012; 11(4): 2014-2031. doi.org/10.1021/pr201211w.
16. Kumar N, Mukhtar MS. Ranking plant network nodes based on their centrality measures. Entropy. 2023; 25(4): 676. doi.org/10.3390/e25040676.
17. Lab MT. BioGRID Interaction Database. 2015. https://thebiogrid.org.
18. Liu W, Li L, Ye H, Chen H, Shen W, Zhong Y, Tian T, He H. From Saccharomyces cerevisiae to human: The important gene co-expression modules. Biomedical Reports . 2017; 7(2): 153-158. doi.org/10.3892/br.2017.941.
19. Negrini S, Gorgoulis V, Halazonetis T. Genomic instability — an evolving hallmark of cancer. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2010; 11:220-228. doi.org/10.1038/nrm2858.
20. Nik-Zainal S. From genome integrity to cancer. Genome Medicine. 2019; 11: 4. doi.org/10.1186/s13073-019-0617-y.
21. Andor N, Maley CC, Ji HP. Genomic instability in cancer: Teetering on the limit of tolerance. Cancer Research. 2017; 77(9): 2179-2185. doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1553.
22. Ozgür A, Vu T, Erkan G, Radev DR. Identifying gene-disease associations using centrality on a literature mined gene-interaction network. Bioinformatics. 2008; 24(13): 277-285. doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btn182.
23. Papamichos-Chronakis M, Peterson CL. Chromatin and the genome integrity network. Nature Reviews Genetics. 2013; 14(1): 62-75. doi.org/10.1038/nrg3345.
24. Pavlopoulos GA, Secrier M, Moschopoulos CN, Soldatos TG, Kossida S, Aerts J, Schneider R, Bagos PG. Using graph theory to analyze biological networks. BioData Mining. 2011; 4: 10. doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-4-10.
25. Protein-protein interaction graphs — Bioinformatics 0.1 documentation. https://a-little-book-of-r-for-bioinformatics.readthedocs.io/en/latest/src/chapter11.html.
26. Tullio V. Yeast genomics and its applications in biotechnological processes: What is our present and near future? Journal of Fungi. 2022; 8(7): 752. doi.org/10.3390/jof8070752.
27. Vella D, Zoppis I, Mauri G, Mauri P, Di Silvestre D. From protein-protein interactions to protein co-expression networks: A new perspective to evaluate large-scale proteomic data. EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology. 2017; 2017(1):6. doi.org/10.1186/s13637-017-0059-z.
28. Yao Y, Dai W. Genomic instability and cancer. Journal of Carcinogenesis and Mutagenesis. 2014; 5: 1000165. doi.org/10.4172/2157-2518.1000165.
29. Zhang XM, Liang L, Liu L, Tang MJ. Graph neural networks and their current applications in bioinformatics. Frontiers in Genetics . 2021; 12:690049. doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.690049.
30. Guo J. (2014). Transcription: the epicenter of gene expression. Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B, 15(5), 409–411. \url{https://doi.org/10.1631/jzus.B1400113}.
31. The human protein interactions - The Human Protein Atlas https://www.proteinatlas.org/humanproteome/interaction
32. Swaroop, S., and Emerson, I. A. Study of Residue Closeness Centrality and its Significance in Predicting Cdr Regions in Antibody Light Chains. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2018; 11(12): 5569. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.01013.2
33. Kamath, V., and Pai, A. (2018). Applications of graph theory in molecular similarity measurements. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 11(4), 1375. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360x.2018.00256.1
34. Shukla, S. L., and Behere, S. E. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacology research. Research Journal of Pharmacology and Pharmacodynamics, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.52711/2321-5836.2025.00010
35. More, S., Raje, V., Phalke, N., and Lokhande, S. (2018). Bioinformatics-An emerging Field. Asian Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Sciences, 8(4), 185. https://doi.org/10.5958/2231-5659.2018.00032.2
36. Reshma, N. R., and Gayathri, U. (2013, December 28). Biological agents for delivery of therapeutic genes. https://ijersonline.org/HTMLPaper.aspx?Journal=Research%20Journal%20of%20Engineering%20and%20Technology;PID=2013-4-4-10
37. Nair, N., Thakur, A., Agrawal, M., Thakur, J., Gupta, S., Sahu, B., Kumar, D., Rai, I., Sonkar, J., Sahu, K., Kuldeep, N., Kumar, K., Muktanand, N., Kaushik, N., Sahu, O., Sahu, S., Kumar, U., Tripathi, D. K., Ajazuddin, N., and Alexander, A. (). Enzyme Immobilization: A Bridge of Understanding between Biotechnology and Pharmacy. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms and Technology. 2018; 10(2): 109. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-4377.2018.00017.4
38. S, B., G, S., and Ys, R. (2009, December 28). Future of Cancer Therapy-COX-2 Inhibitors: A Review. https://rjptonline.org/HTMLPaper.aspx?Journal=Research%20Journal%20of%20Pharmacy%20and%20Technology;PID=2009-2-4-64
39. Natarajan, P. M. (2022). Dental Bioinformatics – Current Scope and Future perspectives. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology, 2351–2356. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360x.2022.00391
40. Rashmi Sharma. Karyotyping: Spying The Faulty Genes. Asian J. Nursing Education and Research. 2019; 9(3):469-470.
41. Reshma, N. R., and Gayathri, U. (2013b, December 28). Biological agents for delivery of therapeutic genes. https://ijersonline.org/HTMLPaper.aspx?Journal=Research%20Journal%20of%20Engineering%20and%20Technology;PID=2013-4-4-10
42. Salve, P., Kirtawade, R., Gharge, D., Dhabale, P., and Burade, K. (2009, December 28). Proteomics: a tool in future. https://rjppd.org/HTMLPaper.aspx?Journal=Research%20Journal%20of%20Pharmacology%20and%20Pharmacodynamics;PID=2009-1-3-15