Author(s):
Rampal Singh, Surya Prakash Gupta, Gopal Garg
Email(s):
gopalgarg007@gmail.com
DOI:
10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00411
Address:
Rampal Singh, Surya Prakash Gupta, Gopal Garg
Rajiv Gandhi Institute of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology AKS University, Satna, Madhya Pradesh, India.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 19,
Issue - 6,
Year - 2026
ABSTRACT:
Nose to brain drug delivery has emerged as a effective non-invasive method to overcome the limitations posed by the blood-brain barrier, especially in the treatment of central nervous system disorders such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and depression. The nose cavity provides a direct physiological and anatomical avenue for the quick and precise delivery of drugs to the brain through the trigeminal and olfactory pathways, bypassing systemic circulation and first-pass metabolism. However, successful drug delivery through this route is influenced by numerous factors including the drug's physicochemical characteristics (e.g., pH, lipophilicity, molecular weight, and polymorphism), formulation variables (e.g., viscosity, osmolarity), and nasal anatomy. Various advanced drug carriers—such as nanoparticles, lipid-based carriers, liposomes, and nanoemulsions—have demonstrated enhanced permeation, bioavailability, and CNS targeting capabilities. Furthermore, formulation strategies like the utilization of prodrugs, enzymatic inhibitors, co-solvents, and absorption enhancers have significantly improved stability of drug and permeation through the nasal mucosa. This review provides a detailed overview of the physiological basis, transport mechanisms, influencing factors, and formulation approaches associated with nose to brain delivery. Emphasis is placed on nanocarrier systems and their capacity to transform CNS therapeutics through controlled, sustained, and site-specific delivery, while addressing the current limitations and future directions necessary for clinical translation.
Cite this article:
Rampal Singh, Surya Prakash Gupta, Gopal Garg. Formulation and Optimization of Nose to Brain targeted system for Drug Delivery. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(6):2881-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00411
Cite(Electronic):
Rampal Singh, Surya Prakash Gupta, Gopal Garg. Formulation and Optimization of Nose to Brain targeted system for Drug Delivery. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(6):2881-6. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00411 Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2026-19-6-68
3. REFRENCES:
1. Spiteri AG, Wishart CL, Pamphlett R, Locatelli G, King NJ. Microglia and monocytes in inflammatory CNS disease: integrating phenotype and function. Acta Neuropathologica. 2022 Feb 1: 1-46.
2. Silva dos Santos J, Goncalves Cirino JP, de Oliveira Carvalho P, Ortega MM. The pharmacological action of kaempferol in central nervous system diseases: A review. Frontiers in Pharmacology. 2021 Jan 13; 11: 565700.
3. Morotti M, Albukhari A, Alsaadi A, Artibani M, Brenton JD, Curbishley SM, Dong T, Dustin ML, Hu Z, McGranahan N, Miller ML. Promises and challenges of adoptive T-cell therapies for solid tumours. British Journal of Cancer. 2021 May 25; 124(11): 1759-76.
4. Modi G, Pillay V, Choonara YE. Advances in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders employing nanotechnology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2010 Jan; 1184(1): 154-72.
5. Quintana DS, Guastella AJ, Westlye LT, Andreassen OA. The promise and pitfalls of intranasally administering psychopharmacological agents for the treatment of psychiatric disorders. Molecular Psychiatry. 2016 Jan; 21(1): 29-38.
6. Wu H, Hu K, Jiang X. From nose to brain: understanding transport capacity and transport rate of drugs. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2008 Oct 1; 5(10): 1159-68.
7. Trevino JT, Quispe RC, Khan F, Novak V. Non-invasive strategies for nose to brain drug delivery. Journal of Clinical Trials. 2020 Dec 10; 10(7): 439.
8. Huda S, Alam MA, Sharma PK. Smart nanocarriers-based drug delivery for cancer therapy: An innovative and developing strategy. Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. 2020 Dec 1; 60: 102018.
9. Liu H, Zhang Q, Wang S, Weng W, Jing Y, Su J. Bacterial extracellular vesicles as bioactive nanocarriers for drug delivery: Advances and perspectives. Bioactive Materials. 2022 Aug 1; 14: 169-81.
10. Waqar MA, Mubarak N, Khan AM, Ahmad S, Zaib M, Kanwal U, Khan IN, Ayesha M, Mughal M, Fahad M. Innovation in nanomedicine: nanocarriers for central nervous system disorders management. International Journal of Polymeric Materials and Polymeric Biomaterials. 2024 Sep 12: 1-8.
11. Milewska S, Niemirowicz-Laskowska K, Siemiaszko G, Nowicki P, Wilczewska AZ, Car H. Current trends and challenges in pharmacoeconomic aspects of nanocarriers as drug delivery systems for cancer treatment. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2021 Sep 28: 6593-644.
12. Djupesland PG, Messina JC, Mahmoud RA. The nasal approach to delivering treatment for brain diseases: an anatomic, physiologic, and delivery technology overview. Therapeutic delivery. 2014 Jun 1; 5(6): 709-33.
13. Khunt D, Misra M. An overview of anatomical and physiological aspects of the nose and the brain. Direct Nose to Brain Drug Delivery. 2021 Jan 1: 3-14.
14. Ruigrok MJ, de Lange EC. Emerging insights for translational pharmacokinetic and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic studies: towards prediction of nose to brain transport in humans. The AAPS Journal. 2015 May; 17: 493-505.
15. Thakur A, Singh PK, Biswal SS, Kumar N, Jha CB, Singh G, Kaur C, Wadhwa S, Kumar R. Drug delivery through nose: A noninvasive technique for brain targeting. Journal of Reports in Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2020 Jan 1; 9(1): 168-75.
16. Majgainya S, Soni S, Bhat P. Novel approach for nose to brain drug delivery bypassing blood brain barrier by pressurized olfactory delivery device. J App Pharm. 2015 Jul; 7(3): 148-63.
17. Kashyap K, Shukla R. Drug delivery and targeting to the brain through nasal route: mechanisms, applications and challenges. Current Drug Delivery. 2019 Dec 1; 16(10): 887-901.
18. Khosrow Tayebati S, Ejike Nwankwo I, Amenta F. Intranasal drug delivery to the central nervous system: present status and future outlook. Current Pharmaceutical Design. 2013 Jan 1; 19(3): 510-26.
19. Charlton ST, Davis SS, Illum L. Evaluation of bioadhesive polymers as delivery systems for nose to brain delivery: in vitro characterisation studies. Journal of Controlled Release. 2007 Apr 2; 118(2): 225-34.
20. Jeong, S. H., Jang, J. H., and Lee, Y. B. (2023). Drug delivery to the brain via the nasal route of administration: exploration of key targets and major consideration factors. Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation. 53(1), 119-152.
21. Li Y, Wang C, Zong S, Qi J, Dong X, Zhao W, Wu W, Fu Q, Lu Y, Chen Z. The trigeminal pathway dominates the nose to brain transportation of intact polymeric nanoparticles: evidence from aggregation-caused quenching probes. Journal of Biomedical Nanotechnology. 2019 Apr 1; 15(4): 686-702.
22. Sun, B. L., Wang, L. H., Yang, T., Sun, J. Y., Mao, L. L., Yang, M. F., ... & Yang, X. Y. (2018). Lymphatic drainage system of the brain: A novel target for intervention of neurological diseases. Progress in Neurobiology, 163, 118-143.
23. Nasare L, Niranjane K, Nagdevte A, Mohril S. Nasal drug delivery system: An emerging approach for brain targeting. World J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci. 2014 Feb 27;3:539-53.
24. Bahadur S, Pathak K. Physicochemical and physiological considerations for efficient nose to brain targeting. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2012 Jan 1;9(1):19-31.
25. Savale S, Mahajan H. Nose to brain: A versatile mode of drug delivery system. Asian J Biomater Res. 2017;3(1):16-38.
26. Kulkarni K, Bhambere T, Chaudhary G, Talele S, Moghal R. Brain targetting through intranasal route. Brain. 2013 Oct;5(4):1441-50.
27. Pardeshi CV, Belgamwar VS. Direct nose to brain drug delivery via integrated nerve pathways bypassing the blood–brain barrier: an excellent platform for brain targeting. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2013 Jul 1; 10(7): 957-72.
28. Simpson MJ. Highly Tunable and Degradable Hydrophobized Nanogels for the Intranasal Delivery of Poorly-Water Soluble Antipsychotic Drugs to the Brain (Doctoral dissertation).
29. Haasbroek‐Pheiffer A, Van Niekerk S, Van der Kooy F, Cloete T, Steenekamp J, Hamman J. In vitro and ex vivo experimental models for evaluation of intranasal systemic drug delivery as well as direct nose‐to‐brain drug delivery. Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition. 2023 Feb; 44(1): 94-112.
30. Misra A, Kher G. Drug delivery systems from nose to brain. Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology. 2012 Sep 1; 13(12): 2355-79.
31. Lim SA. The open neuroscience initiative: A free-to-access and-adopt digital textbook for undergraduate students of introductory neuroscience. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education. 2021 Dec 24; 20(1): A83.
32. Nagpal K, Singh SK, Mishra DN. Drug targeting to brain: a systematic approach to study the factors, parameters and approaches for prediction of permeability of drugs across BBB. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery. 2013 Jul 1; 10(7): 927-55.
33. Thorne RG, Pronk GJ, Padmanabhan V, Frey Ii WH. Delivery of insulin-like growth factor-I to the rat brain and spinal cord along olfactory and trigeminal pathways following intranasal administration. Neuroscience. 2004 Jan 1; 127(2): 481-96.
34. Garcia-Garcia E, Andrieux K, Gil S, Couvreur P. Colloidal carriers and blood–brain barrier (BBB) translocation: a way to deliver drugs to the brain?. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2005 Jul 25; 298(2): 274-92.
35. Van Tellingen O, Yetkin-Arik B, De Gooijer MC, Wesseling P, Wurdinger T, De Vries HE. Overcoming the blood–brain tumor barrier for effective glioblastoma treatment. Drug Resistance Updates. 2015 Mar 1; 19: 1-2.
36. Schaefer ML, Böttger B, Silver WL, Finger TE. Trigeminal collaterals in the nasal epithelium and olfactory bulb: a potential route for direct modulation of olfactory information by trigeminal stimuli. Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2002 Mar 12; 444(3): 221-6.
37. Kumar TP, Sirisha B, Raju PN, Reddy GN. Nasal drug delivery: A Potential Route for Brain Targetting. The Pharma Innovation. 2013 Mar 1; 2(1).
38. Fernandes C, Soni U, Patravale V. Nano-interventions for neurodegenerative disorders.
39. Davis SS, Illum L. Absorption enhancers for nasal drug delivery. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2003 Nov; 42: 1107-28.
40. Mura P, Mennini N, Nativi C, Richichi B. In situ mucoadhesive-thermosensitive liposomal gel as a novel vehicle for nasal extended delivery of opiorphin. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2018 Jan 1; 122: 54-61.
41. Ahmad E, Feng Y, Qi J, Fan W, Ma Y, He H, Xia F, Dong X, Zhao W, Lu Y, Wu W. Evidence of nose to brain delivery of nanoemulsions: cargoes but not vehicles. Nanoscale. 2017; 9(3): 1174-83.
42. Godfrey L, Iannitelli A, Garrett NL, Moger J, Imbert I, King T, Porreca F, Soundararajan R, Lalatsa A, Schätzlein AG, Uchegbu IF. Nanoparticulate peptide delivery exclusively to the brain produces tolerance free analgesia. Journal of Controlled Release. 2018 Jan 28; 270: 135-44.
43. Shah B, Khunt D, Misra M, Padh H. Formulation and in-vivo pharmacokinetic consideration of intranasal microemulsion and mucoadhesive microemulsion of rivastigmine for brain targeting. Pharmaceutical Research. 2018 Jan; 35: 1-0.
44. Shah B, Khunt D, Misra M, Padh H. Application of Box-Behnken design for optimization and development of quetiapine fumarate loaded chitosan nanoparticles for brain delivery via intranasal route. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules. 2016; Aug 1; 89: 206-18.
45. Müller RH, Mäder K, Gohla S. Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) for controlled drug delivery–a review of the state of the art. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics. 2000 Jul 3; 50(1): 161-77.
46. Eskandari S, Varshosaz J, Minaiyan M, Tabbakhian M. Brain delivery of valproic acid via intranasal administration of nanostructured lipid carriers: in vivo pharmacodynamic studies using rat electroshock model. International Journal of Nanomedicine. 2011 Feb 15: 363-71.
47. Bhosale RR, Osmani RA, Ghodake PP, Shaikh SM, Chavan SR. Nanoemulsion: A review on novel profusion in advanced drug delivery. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biological Research. 2014 Jan 1; 2(1): 122.
48. Jaiswal M, Dudhe R, Sharma PK. Nanoemulsion: an advanced mode of drug delivery system. 3 Biotech. 2015 Apr; 5(2): 123-7.
49. Arora P, Sharma S, Garg S. Permeability issues in nasal drug delivery. Drug Discovery Today. 2002 Sep 15; 7(18): 967-75.
50. Ohwaki T, Ando H, Watanabe S, Miyake Y. Effects of dose, pH, and osmolarity on nasal absorption of secretin in rats. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1985 May 1; 74(5): 550-2.
51. Ohwaki T, Ando H, Kakimoto F, Uesugi K, Watanabe S, Miyake Y, Kayano M. Effects of dose, pH, and osmolarity on nasal absorption of secretin in rats II: histological aspects of the nasal mucosa in relation to the absorption variation due to the effects of pH and osmolarity. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1987 Sep; 76(9): 695-8.
52. Corbo DC, Liu JC, Chien YW. Characterization of the barrier properties of mucosal membranes. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1990 Mar 1; 79(3): 202-6.
53. Huang CH, Kimura R, Bawarshi‐Nassar R, Hussain A. Mechanism of nasal absorption of drugs II: Absorption of L‐tyrosine and the effect of structural modification on its absorption. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 1985 Dec; 74(12): 1298-301.
54. Fisher AN, Illum L, Davis SS, Schacht EH. Di-iodo-L-tyrosine-labelled dextrans as molecular size markers of nasal absorption in the rat. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 1992 Jul; 44(7): 550-4.