Author(s):
Yessy Andriani Fauziah, Eveline Yulia Darmadi, Dian Agustin Wahjuningrum, Ahmad Yudianto, Arofi Kurniawan, Dwi Setianingtyas, Farouk Alghazaly
Email(s):
yessy.andriani@ciputra.ac.id
DOI:
10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00412
Address:
Yessy Andriani Fauziah1,2, Eveline Yulia Darmadi2, Dian Agustin Wahjuningrum3, Ahmad Yudianto4, Arofi Kurniawan5, Dwi Setianingtyas6, Farouk Alghazaly7
1Doctoral Program in Dental Science, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Jawa Timur 60132, Indonesia.
2School of Dental Medicine, Universitas Ciputra, Surabaya, Jawa Timur 60219, Indonesia.
3Department of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dental Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Jawa Timur, 60132, Indonesia.
4Department of Forensic and Medicolegal, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Jawa Timur 60132, Indonesia.
5Department of Odontology Forensic, Faculty of Dental, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Jawa Timur 60132, Indonesia.
6Department of Oral Medicine, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Hang Tuah, Surabaya, Jawa Timur, 60111.
7Department of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Janad University for Science and Technology, Taiz, Yemen.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 19,
Issue - 6,
Year - 2026
ABSTRACT:
Saliva is gaining recognition as a promising biological fluid for drug detection in forensic odontology. Its ease of collection, noninvasive nature, and ability to reflect recent drug intake make it an attractive alternative to blood or urine. In recent years, advances in diagnostic technology have enhanced the sensitivity and accuracy of detecting drugs through saliva. Techniques such as biosensors, immunoassays, and chromatography, combined with mass spectrometry, have opened up new possibilities for real-time and field-based applications. The integration of artificial intelligence and portable lab devices further enhances the practicality of saliva analysis in forensic settings. However, several challenges remain. The composition of saliva can vary depending on hydration, time of day, and oral health conditions, which may affect drug concentration and result interpretation. In some cases, the relationship between saliva and blood drug levels is not well established, raising concerns about the reliability of saliva as a source of legal evidence. Ethical issues such as patient consent, data privacy, and the legal acceptance of saliva-based results in court proceedings also require careful consideration. Moreover, standardised methods for collecting, storing, and analysing saliva samples are still lacking in many regions. This article provides an updated overview of the use of saliva for drug detection in forensic odontology. It highlights both the scientific progress and the obstacles that must be addressed. With continued interdisciplinary collaboration and technological innovation, saliva has the potential to become a central tool in forensic toxicology.
Cite this article:
Yessy Andriani Fauziah, Eveline Yulia Darmadi, Dian Agustin Wahjuningrum, Ahmad Yudianto, Arofi Kurniawan, Dwi Setianingtyas, Farouk Alghazaly. Saliva-Based Drug Detection in Forensic Odontology: Current Advances and Challenges. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(6):2887-3. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00412
Cite(Electronic):
Yessy Andriani Fauziah, Eveline Yulia Darmadi, Dian Agustin Wahjuningrum, Ahmad Yudianto, Arofi Kurniawan, Dwi Setianingtyas, Farouk Alghazaly. Saliva-Based Drug Detection in Forensic Odontology: Current Advances and Challenges. Research Journal Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(6):2887-3. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00412 Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2026-19-6-69
REFERENCES:
1. Sinha M. Sahu M. Sallawad SS. Ahirwar B. Isukapatla AR. Characteristics and identifying features of various natural toxins and poisonous plants used as weapons in forensic cases. Res J Pharm Technol. 2017; 10(12): 4237-4244. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00776.4
2. Casati S. Binda M. Dongiovanni P. Meroni M. D'Amato A. Roda G. et al. Recent advances of drugs monitoring in oral fluid and comparison with blood. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023; 61(11): 1978-1993. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2023-0343
3. Fauziah YA. Narmada IB. Darmadi EY. Adityatama AP. Wahjuningrum DA. Yudianto A. et al. Integration of advanced technology in forensic odontology: revolutionizing identification and forensic analysis. Res J Pharm Technol. 2025; 18(7): 3250-3257. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2025.00468
4. Venugopal A. Vanshika S. Naik SS. Valappil S. Verma A. Rajan S. et al. A mini review on the applications of nanomaterials in forensic science. arXiv. 2023. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.09643
5. Nandakumar E. Savitha G. A study of salivary lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level in normal individuals and oral cancer patients. Res J Pharm Technol. 2015; 8(7): 719-722. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2015.00155.9
6. Park HR. Effect of salivary Streptococcus mutans and lactobacilli levels after uptake of probiotics for clinical trial. Res J Pharm Technol. 2017; 10(9): 2984-2988. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00528.5
7. Kamath V. Mukherjee P. Swapna BV. Kamath M. Nanodentistry: present and future. Res J Pharm Technol. 2021; 14(8): 4205-4210. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00689
8. Resztak M. Czyrski A. Sobiak J. Saliva as a matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring and disease biomarkers in children and adolescents. Pharmacol Rep. 2025; 77: 921-961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43440-025-00732-7
9. Paikrao HM. Mahakalkar A. Patil AS. Panchabhai M. Rapid detection of illicit drugs in saliva. In Nanotechnology-Based Sensing Platforms for Illicit Drugs 2025; 275-300, Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-23740-9.00013-2
10. Fauziah YA. Wahjuningrum DA. Sutikno AE. Susanto DA. Wahjudianto N. Goenharto A. Ethical and legal aspect of digital dentistry in conservative dental practice. J Int Dent Med Res. 2024; 17(4): 1783-1788. http://www.jidmr.com/journal/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/56-Rev-D24_3300_Dian_A_W_Yessy_Andriani_Fauziah_Indonesia.pdf
11. Sharma A. Hossain I. Thomas A. Sonkusale S. Saliva-sensing dental floss: a novel tool for assessing daily stress via on-demand salivary cortisol measurement integrating molecularly imprinted polymer and microfluidics. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024; 17(17): 25083-25092. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5c02988
12. Chinnamurthy B. Jyothirmai K. Reddy RS. Ramesh T. Babu BA. Darna G. Saliva as a diagnostic tool in forensic odontology: scope and methods. Uttar Pradesh J Zool. 2023; 44(9): 95-104. https://doi.org/10.56557/upjoz/2023/v44i93497
13. Upadhyay M. Shrivastava P. Verma K. Joshi B. Recent advancements in identification and detection of saliva as forensic evidence. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2023; 13(17): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-023-00336-3
14. Rigatti M. Carreiro S. Boyer EW. Machine learning applications in toxicology. In Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice: How AI Technologies Impact Medical Research and Clinics 2023; 377-382. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-15688-5.00005-X
15. Shivananda S. Doddawad VG. Shetty A. Varsha VK. ABO blood group detection in teeth from cadaver: a modified absorption-elution technique. Res J Pharm Technol. 2023; 16(2): 858-862. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00146
16. Shetty SS. Binti Roshdi RFA. Nor NFBM. Wen LY. Dass W. Kaur G. et al. Effects of green tea and black tea on salivary pH and flow rate in healthy individuals. Res J Pharm Technol. 2020; 13(2): 627-630. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00119.5
17. Barakzai M. Dawlaty B. Study of unstimulated salivary calcium and viscosity in normal adults. Res J Pharm Technol. 2024; 17(10): 4707-4710. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00725
18. Al-Hindawi SH. Luaibi NM. Al-Ghurabi BH. Estimation of alkaline phosphatase level in serum and saliva of hypothyroid patients with and without periodontitis. Res J Pharm Technol. 2018; 11(7): 2993-2996. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00551.6
19. Brown OR. Marijuana: forensics of abuse, medical uses, controversy and AI. Forensic Sci. 2023; 3(4): 571-575. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci3040040
20. Ashwatha Pratha A. Prabakar J. Comparing the effect of carbonated and energy drinks on salivary pH: an in vivo randomized controlled trial. Res J Pharm Technol. 2019; 12(10): 4699-4702. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2019.00809.6
21. Singh A. Sinha M. Sahu M. Ahirwar B. Isukapatla AR. Examination of tobacco-chewed saliva on different fabrics using starch-iodine test: a forensic perspective. Res J Pharm Technol. 2017; 10(12): 4285-4290. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00785.5
22. Barakzai M. Dawlaty B. Study of unstimulated salivary flow rate, pH, and buffer capacity in normal adults. Res J Pharm Technol. 2024; 17(5): 2213-2216. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2024.00348
23. Ahmed MA. Jain AR. Varma A. Knowledge, attitude and practice regarding antisialogogue drugs in dental management. Res J Pharm Technol. 2017; 10(10): 3489-3491. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00624.2
24. Sych IV. Bevz OV. Sych IA. Shaposhnyk AM. Zarubina MV. Kryvanych OV. et al. Development of a method for determining methandienone in toxicology and doping-analysis. Res J Pharm Technol. 2021; 14(10): 5169-5174. https://doi.org/10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00899
25. Bui D. McWilliams LA. Wu L. Zhou H. Wong SJ. You M. et al. Pharmacokinetic basis for using saliva matrine concentrations as compliance monitoring in antitumor B chemoprevention trials. Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(1): 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010089
26. Song M. Bai H. Zhang P. Zhou X. Ying B. Promising applications of human-derived saliva biomarker testing in clinical diagnostics. Int J Oral Sci. 2023; 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41368-022-00209-w
27. Jarić S. Kudriavtseva A. Nekrasov N. Orlov AV. Komarov IA. Barsukov LA. et al. Femtomolar detection of NT-proBNP in artificial saliva using a liquid-gated aptasensor with reduced graphene oxide. Microchem J. 2024; 196: 109611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2023.109611
28. Manousi N. Samanidou V. Green sample preparation of alternative biosamples in forensic toxicology. Sustain Chem Pharm. 2021; 20: 100388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2021.100388
29. Cardoso AG. Viltres H. Ortega GA. Phung V. Grewal R. Mozaffari H. et al. Electrochemical sensing of analytes in saliva: challenges, progress, and perspectives. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2023; 160: 116965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2023.116965
30. Reinstadler V. Lierheimer S. Boettcher M. Oberacher H. A validated workflow for drug detection in oral fluid using non-targeted LC-MS/MS. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2019; 411(4): 867-876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-018-1504-x
31. Vollmer AC. Wagmann L. Weber AA. Meyer MR. Advancing drug testing in oral fluid: comparison of microflow and analytical flow LC-Orbitrap analysis. Microchem J. 2025; 212: 113508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2025.113508
32. Beduk D. Beduk T. de Oliveira Filho JI. Ait Lahcen A. Aldemir E. Guler Celik E. et al. Smart multiplex point-of-care platform for simultaneous drug monitoring. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023; 15(31): 37247-37258. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c06461
33. Silva WRF. Monteiro LCP. Costa MC. Boaventura RVA. de Araújo END. Cunha RORR et al. Graphene-based magnetoelastic biosensor for COVID-19 serodiagnosis. 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.08039
34. Xie Y. Wu S. Chen Z. Jiang J. Sun J. Rapid nanomolar detection of methamphetamine in biofluids via reagentless electrochemical aptamer-based biosensor. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2022; 1207: 339742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2022.339742
35. Yang S. Kar S. Application of artificial intelligence and machine learning in early detection of adverse drug reactions and drug-induced toxicity. Artificial Intelligence in Chemistry. 2023; 1(2): 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aichem.2023.100011
36. Mishra RK. Sempionatto JR. Li Z. Brown C. Galdino NM. Shah R. et al. Simultaneous detection of salivary Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and alcohol using a wearable electrochemical ring sensor. Talanta. 2020; 211: 120757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2020.120757
37. Awad A. Rodríguez-Pombo L. Simón PE. Álvarez AC. Alvarez-Lorenzo C. Basit AW. et al. Smartphone biosensors for non-invasive drug monitoring in saliva. Biosensors. 2025; 15(3): 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios15030163
38. Apoorva S. Nguyen NT. Sreejith KR. Recent developments and future perspectives of microfluidics and smart technologies in wearable devices. Lab on a Chip. 2024; 24: 1833-1866. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4LC00089G
39. Singh G. Mulay AA. Saliva as a diagnostic tool in criminal investigation: a scoping review. IP International Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicological Sciences. 2025; 10(2): 41-43. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijfmts.2025.012
40. Desrosiers NA. Huestis MA. Oral fluid drug testing: Analytical approaches and interpretation. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 2019; 43(6): 415-443. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkz048
41. Helland A. Muller S. Spigset O. Krabseth HM. Hansen M. Skråstad RB. Drug detection in oral fluid and urine after therapeutic doses of dexamphetamine, lisdexamphetamine and methylphenidate. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 2025; 49(2): 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/bkae097