Author(s):
Marisa Setiawan, Puspa Wardhani, Hartono Kahar, Munawaroh Fitriah, Lita Diah Rahmawati
Email(s):
puspa-w-2@fk.unair.ac.id
DOI:
10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00477
Address:
Marisa Setiawan1,2, Puspa Wardhani3,4*, Hartono Kahar3,4, Munawaroh Fitriah3,4, Lita Diah Rahmawati5,6
1Clinical Pathology Specialization Programme, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
2Clinical Pathology Specialization Programme, Faculty of Medicine-Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
3Department of Clinical Pathology, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
4Department of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine-Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
5Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Soetomo General Academic Hospital, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
6Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine-Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, East Java, Indonesia.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 19,
Issue - 7,
Year - 2026
ABSTRACT:
Background: While immunosuppressant therapy is the primary option to manage autoimmune rheumatic diseases, it may increase the risk of reactivated tuberculosis (TB) infections. One of the recommended examinations for latent TB is the interferon-gamma (IFN-?) release assay (IGRA). Since immunosuppressant therapy can cause false negative IGRA results, some studies have advised using flow cytometry to confirm IFN-? production. This study aimed to investigate the effect of immunosuppressant therapy on T cells IFN-? production from autoimmune rheumatic disease patients in response to M. TB virulence factors ESAT-6 and CFP-10, detected using the T-SPOT.TB IGRA and flow cytometry. Methods: This analytical observational study employed a cross-sectional design and included 57 patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases. ESAT-6- and CFP-10-induced T cells IFN-? production was detected using the T-SPOT.TB IGRA and flow cytometry. The immunosuppressant therapy effect on the T-SPOT.TB IGRA and flow cytometry IFN-? results were examined using logistic regression. Results: Among the 57 patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases, 43 (75%) had received immunosuppressant therapy. Most patients were female (89%). The most common diagnosis was spondyloarthritis. The most common immunosuppressant therapy was conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The T-SPOT.TB IGRA had a positive rate of 12%. Immunosuppressant therapy did not significantly affect ESAT-6- and CFP-10-induced T cells IFN-? production detected using the T-SPOT.TB IGRA and flow cytometry (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Immunosuppressant therapy did not significantly affect ESAT-6- and CFP-10-induced IFN-? production by T cells detected using the T-SPOT.TB IGRA and flow cytometry in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases.
Cite this article:
Marisa Setiawan, Puspa Wardhani, Hartono Kahar, Munawaroh Fitriah, Lita Diah Rahmawati. The effect of Immunosuppressant Therapy on ESAT-6- and CFP-10-Induced Interferon-gamma Production using the T-SPOT.TB Interferon-Gamma Release Assay and Flow Cytometry in patients with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(7):3357-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00477
Cite(Electronic):
Marisa Setiawan, Puspa Wardhani, Hartono Kahar, Munawaroh Fitriah, Lita Diah Rahmawati. The effect of Immunosuppressant Therapy on ESAT-6- and CFP-10-Induced Interferon-gamma Production using the T-SPOT.TB Interferon-Gamma Release Assay and Flow Cytometry in patients with Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2026;19(7):3357-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2026.00477 Available on: https://www.rjptonline.org/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2026-19-7-64
REFERENCES:
1. Moutsopoulos HM. Autoimmune rheumatic diseases: One or many diseases? Journal of Translational Autoimmunity. 2021; 4: 100129. doi: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2021.100129 Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2589909021000496
2. M. Pache M, R. Pangavhane R. Immunotherapy in Autoimmune Diseases: Current Advances and Future Directions. AJPR. 2025 May 5; 183–91. doi: 10.52711/2231-5691.2025.00030 Available from: https://asianjpr.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2025-15-2-15
3. Almutairi K, et al. The global prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis: a meta-analysis based on a systematic review. Rheumatol Int. 2021 May; 41(5): 863–77. doi: 10.1007/s00296-020-04731-0 Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00296-020-04731-0
4. Stolwijk C, et al. Global Prevalence of Spondyloarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Regression Analysis. Arthritis Care & Research. 2016 Sep; 68(9): 1320–31. doi: 10.1002/acr.22831 Available from: https://acrjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acr.22831
5. Tian J, et al. Global epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus: a comprehensive systematic analysis and modelling study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023 Mar; 82(3): 351–6. doi:10.1136/ard-2022-223035 Available from: https://ard.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/ard-2022-223035
6. Gosavi S, et al. Comparative study on treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Asian Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 11(1): 5–12. doi: 10.1136/ard-2022-223035 Available from: http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ajpt&volume=11&issue=1&article=002
7. Perhimpunan Reumatologi Indonesia. Pedoman Penapisan dan Tata Laksana Infeksi Tuberkulosis Laten pada Pasien Penyakit Reumatik yang Akan Mendapatkan Terapi DMARD Biologik. Perhimpunan Reumatologi Indonesia; 2017. Available from: https://reumatologi.or.id/download/pedoman-penapisan-dan-tata-laksana-infeksi-tuberkulosis-laten-pada-pasien-penyakit-reumatik-yang-akan-mendapatkan-terapi-dmard-biologik/
8. Hussain Y, Khan H. Immunosuppressive Drugs. In: Encyclopedia of Infection and Immunity. Elsevier; 2022. p. 726–40. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-818731-9.00068-9 Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/B9780128187319000689
9. Jick SS, et al. Glucocorticoid use, other associated factors, and the risk of tuberculosis. Arthritis and Rheumatism. 2006 Feb 15; 55(1): 19–26. doi: 10.1002/art.21705 Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.21705
10. Nandgude TD, et al. Clinical Features and Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Review. Rese Jour of Pharm and Technol. 2018; 11(12): 5701. doi: 10.5958/0974-360x.2018.01032.6 Available from: http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:rjpt&volume=11&issue=12&article=081
11. Sweta S, et al. Rheumatoid Arthritis, A Laconic Review to understand their Basic Concept and Management Process. AJPR. 2022 Nov 22; 312–22. doi: 10.52711/2231-5691.2022.00051 Available from: https://asianjpr.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2022-12-4-10
12. Sonawane TusharN, et al. Application of Steroids in Clinical practice. AJPS. 2022 Mar 5;8–10. doi: 10.52711/2231-5659.2022.00002 Available from: https://ajpsonline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2022-12-1-2
13. Naredla B, et al. Updates on Novel Treatments for Rheumatoid Arthritis. RJST. 2023 Nov 11; 225–32. doi: 10.52711/2349-2988.2023.00039 Available from: https://rjstonline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2023-15-4-11
14. Chandrashekara S, et al. Prevalence of LTBI in patients with autoimmune diseases and accuracy of IGRA in predicting TB relapse. Rheumatology. 2023 Dec 1; 62(12): 3952–6. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead315 Available from: https://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/article/62/12/3952/7205333
15. Anton C, et al. Latent tuberculosis infection in patients with rheumatic diseases. J Bras Pneumol. 2019; 45(2): e20190023. doi: 10.1590/1806-3713/e20190023 Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1806-37132019000200502&tlng=en
16. Sagavkar SR, Devkar SR. Tuberculosis: A Review. Asian Jour Pharmac Rese. 2018; 8(3): 191. doi: 10.5958/2231-5691.2018.00033.3 Available from: http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ajpr&volume=8&issue=3&article=013
17. World Health Organization. Latent tuberculosis infection: updated and consolidated guidelines for programmatic management. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/260233
18. TB-PI-US-0001-V9.pdf. Available from: https://www.tspot.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/TB-PI-US-0001-V9.pdf
19. Use of alternative interferon-gamma release assays for the diagnosis of TB infection - WHO Policy Statement. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/28-01-2022-use-of-alternative-interferon-gamma-release-assays-for-the-diagnosis-of-tb-infection---who-policy-statement
20. Yamasue M, et al. Factors associated with false negative interferon-γ release assay results in patients with tuberculosis: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2020 Jan 31; 10(1): 1607. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58459-9 Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-58459-9
21. Wong SH, et al. Effect of immunosuppressive therapy on interferon γ release assay for latent tuberculosis screening in patients with autoimmune diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thorax. 2016 Jan; 71(1): 64–72. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207811 Available from: https://thorax.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-207811
22. Sauzullo I, et al. Multi-functional flow cytometry analysis of CD4+ T cells as an immune biomarker for latent tuberculosis status in patients treated with tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 2014 Apr 24;176(3):410–7. doi: 10.1111/cei.12290 Available from: https://academic.oup.com/cei/article/176/3/410/6421167
23. Ozsoy Z, et al. POS1187 DO Immunosuppressive Agents Affect IGRA Tests IN Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis? Ann Rheum Dis. 2022 Jun; 81(Suppl 1): 921.1-921. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.3983 Available from: https://ard.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.3983
24. Annavarapu S, et al. A Study on Clinical Manifestations, Treatment Pattern and Outcome in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients in Tertiary Care Hospital. Rese Jour of Pharm and Technol. 2017; 10(5): 1383. doi: 10.5958/0974-360x.2017.00246.3 Available from: http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:rjpt&volume=10&issue=5&article=021
25. Oliver JE, Silman AJ. Why are women predisposed to autoimmune rheumatic diseases? Arthritis Res Ther. 2009; 11(5): 252. doi: 10.1186/ar2825 Available from: http://arthritis-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/ar2825
26. Srivastava S, et al. Rheumatoid Arthritis: An Autoimmune Disease Prevalent in Females. Rese Jour of Pharm and Technol. 2016; 9(2): 170. doi: 10.5958/0974-360x.2016.00030.5 Available from: http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:rjpt&volume=9&issue=2&article=013
27. Kumar VP, et al. A Prospective Study on Comparing the efficacy of Combination Therapy and Monotherapy of DMARDs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rese Jour of Pharm and Technol. 2018; 11(10): 4497. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2018.00823.5 Available from: http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:rjpt&volume=11&issue=10&article=053
28. Cohen A, et al. The global prevalence of latent tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2019; Sep; 54(3): 1900655. doi: 10.1183/13993003.00655-2019 Available from: http://publications.ersnet.org/lookup/doi/10.1183/13993003.00655-2019
29. Jiang B, et al. Evaluation of interferon‐gamma release assay (T‐SPOT.TBTM ) for diagnosis of tuberculosis infection in rheumatic disease patients. Int J of Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan; 19(1): 38–42. doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.12772 Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1756-185X.12772
30. Arenas Miras MDM, et al. Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: T.SPOT.TB versus Tuberculin Skin Test. BioMed Research International. 2014; 2014: 1–8. doi: 10.1155/2014/291031 Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2014/291031/
31. Park CH, et al. Impact of Immunosuppressive Therapy on the Performance of Latent Tuberculosis Screening Tests in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JPM. 2022 Mar 21; 12(3): 507. doi: 10.3390/jpm12030507 Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4426/12/3/507
32. Costantino F, et al. Screening for Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Arthritis: Discrepancies Between Tuberculin Skin Test and Interferon-γ Release Assay Results. J Rheumatol. 2013 Dec; 40(12): 1986–93. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130303 Available from: http://www.jrheum.org/lookup/doi/10.3899/jrheum.130303
33. Tesfa L, et al. Confirmation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection by flow cytometry after ex vivo incubation of peripheral blood T cells with an ESAT‐6‐derived peptide pool. Cytometry Part B Clinical. 2004 Jul; 60B(1): 47–53. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20007 Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.b.20007
34. Hughes AJ, et al. Diagnosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection using ESAT-6 and intracellular cytokine cytometry. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. 2005 Jul 28; 142(1): 132–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2005.02884.x Available from: https://academic.oup.com/cei/article/142/1/132/6440445
35. Won DI, Park JR. Flow cytometric measurements of TB‐specific T cells comparing with QuantiFERON‐TB gold. Cytometry Part B Clinical. 2010 Mar; 78B(2): 71–80. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.20503 Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.b.20503
36. Jung J, et al. Is the New Interferon-Gamma Releasing Assay Beneficial for the Diagnosis of Latent and Active Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infections in Tertiary Care Setting? JCM. 2021 Mar 29; 10(7): 1376. doi: 10.3390/jcm10071376 Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/7/1376
37. Papageorgiou CV, et al. Flow cytometry analysis of CD4+IFN‐Γ+ T‐ cells for the diagnosis of mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Cytometry Part B Clinical. 2016 May; 90(3): 303–11. doi: 10.1002/cyto.b.21275 Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.b.21275
38. Dinser R, et al. Evaluation of latent tuberculosis infection in patients with inflammatory arthropathies before treatment with TNF- blocking drugs using a novel flow-cytometric interferon- release assay. Rheumatology. 2007 Dec 20; 47(2): 212–8. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kem351 Available from: https://academic.oup.com/rheumatology/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/rheumatology/kem351
39. Rovina N, et al. Immune Response to Mycobacterial Infection: Lessons from Flow Cytometry. Clinical and Developmental Immunology. 2013; 2013: 1–9. doi: 10.1155/2013/464039 Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/jir/2013/464039/
40. Arias-Guillén M, et al. T-Cell Profiling and the Immunodiagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2014 Feb; 20(2): 329–38. doi: 10.1097/01.MIB.0000438429.38423.62 Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ibdjournal/article/20/2/329-338/4578970
41. Carranza C, et al. Diagnosis for Latent Tuberculosis Infection: New Alternatives. Front Immunol. 2020 Sep 10; 11: 2006. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02006 Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2020.02006/full
42. Belard E, et al. Prednisolone treatment affects the performance of the QuantiFERON gold in-tube test and the tuberculin skin test in patients with autoimmune disorders screened for latent tuberculosis infection: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases. 2011; Nov; 17(11): 2340–9. doi: 10.1002/ibd.21605 Available from: https://academic.oup.com/ibdjournal/article/17/11/2340-2349/4631016